United States: Employee Benefits Update August 2016

Select Compliance Deadlines and Reminders

  1. Summary Annual Report ("SAR") Deadline for Calendar Year Defined Contribution Plans. Plan administrators must distribute SARs to participants and beneficiaries within nine months of the plan's year end. For plan years that end December 31, the SAR is due September 30, 2016. If the plan received an extension for filing Form 5500, the deadline for providing SARs is extended by two months.
  2. Form 5500 Filing Deadline for Calendar Year Plans with Extensions. For plans that obtained an extension for filing Form 5500, the Form 5500 must be filed by October 15, 2016.

General Benefit Plan Developments

The DOL Proposes to Modernize the Form 5500

The Department of Labor ("DOL") proposed revisions to modernize and improve the Form 5500 Annual Report to keep pace with changing conditions in the employee benefit plan and financial market sectors. The DOL also hopes to remedy the Form's current gaps in collecting data from ERISA group health plans. The proposed revisions intend to:

  • Modernize the financial statements and investment information about employee benefit plans;
  • Update the reporting requirements for service provider fee and expense information;
  • Enhance accessibility and usability of data on the forms;
  • Require reporting by all group health plans covered by Title I of ERISA through a new Schedule J; and
  • Improve compliance under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code through new questions regarding plan operations, service provider relationships and financial management of the plan.

The proposed revisions would apply to the 2019 Plan Year reports, which would not be due until 2020. Many critics of the revisions claim that the new forms will be more tedious and labor intensive, and will significantly increase the burden of reporting on plan sponsors. The DOL has requested comments on the proposed revisions, and the deadline to provide comments is October 4, 2016.

For more information about the proposed revisions, please see the DOL Fact Sheet regarding the proposal at: https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/fs proposal to modernize and improve the form 5500 filed by employee benefit plans.pdf

Retirement Plan Developments

IRS Issues Clarifications to Instructions for Reporting Failures to Pay Required Minimum Distributions

Line 4l of Schedules H and I of Form 5500 asks "Has the plan failed to provide any benefit due under the plan?" The instructions for the 2015 plan year were amended to explain that reportable failures include failure to pay required minimum distributions ("RMDs"). On July 29, 2016, the IRS released guidance providing that Form 5500 filers do not need to report any unpaid RMDs for participants who have retired or separated from service, or their beneficiaries, but cannot be located after expending reasonable efforts. In addition, a Form 5500 filer that is in the process of expending such reasonable efforts to locate missing participants also does not need to report those unpaid RMDs. This new guidance highlights the importance of plans maintaining appropriate procedures for locating missing participants.

Department of Commerce Issues Final Rule Regarding the Limited Access Death Master File ("DMF")

The U.S. Commerce Department's National Technical Information Service issued the final rule on accessing the DMF. Effective November 28, 2016, any "person" that desires access to the DMF must certify that the person will not disclose a deceased individual's DMF, and further has:

  • a legitimate fraud prevention interest or a legitimate business purpose pursuant to the law, governmental rule, regulation or fiduciary duty;
  • systems, facilities and procedures in place to safeguard the accessed information; and
  • experience in maintaining the confidentiality, security and appropriate use of accessed information.

For purposes of the rule, "person" is defined as any individual, corporation, company, private organization, and state and local government departments and agencies. The current certification fee is $200, and is expected to increase prior to the rule's effective date.

First Circuit Finds Fidelity May Keep Float Income

On July 13, 2016, the First Circuit issued its decision in In re Fidelity ERISA Float Litigation (formerly Kelley v. Fidelity), upholding Fidelity's practice of retaining "float" income earned from 401(k) accounts. The practice allows Fidelity to keep any interest earned when a 401(k) participant requests a distribution of his or her benefits and the distribution amount is held temporarily in a redemption account. In its decision, the court also focused on whether or not the participants had suffered any injury, noting that participants were not "short so much as a penny." The court held that, because the interest earned by Fidelity was never intended to go to the plan, it did not qualify as a plan asset under ERISA. The court did not address whether the float income was consistent with ERISA's reasonable compensation rules.

Ninth Circuit Finds Church Plan Must Be Sponsored By Church

The Ninth Circuit joined the Third and Seventh Circuits in Rollins v. Dignity Health, holding that a benefit plan of a religiously affiliated hospital does not constitute an ERISA exempt church plan. In its decision, the court found that only benefit plans created by churches qualify for the church plan exemption. In these circuits, the church with which a hospital is associated must create the plan that the hospital administers to qualify for the exemption.

U.S. District Court Finds Plan Can Require Binding Arbitration

In a recent and unusual case, Luciano v. Teachers Ins. & Annuity Assoc. of America/College Retirement Equities Fund, a U.S. District Court in New Jersey upheld a provision in the Education Testing Service's retirement plan requiring that appeals for claims regarding plan benefits be submitted to a binding arbitration process wherein the claimant and the plan "equally share" in the arbitration costs. The court determined that a "full and fair review" is only required of a plan fiduciary, as opposed to an outside body, such as a court.

Health and Welfare Plan Developments

IRS Issues Proposed Rules Regarding Premium Tax Credits

The IRS issued proposed rules addressing how employer payments to employees who decline the employer's health plan coverage ("Opt Out Payments") are treated for purposes of the ACA's shared responsibility penalty provisions. Applicable Large Employers ("ALEs") which offer minimum essential coverage may be liable for penalties if any full time employee receives a premium tax credit for coverage purchased on an Exchange.

If an employer offers Opt Out Payments regardless of whether the employee enrolls in coverage with another source, the additional compensation is considered an unconditional Opt Out Payment. Under the proposed rules, unconditional Opt Out Payments would be treated as required employee contributions for purposes of determining affordability of employer coverage and eligibility for participant premium tax credits ("PTEs").

In contrast, an Opt Out Payment is considered "conditional" if (1) the employee declining enrollment in employer sponsored coverage, and (2) the employer annually providing reasonable evidence that the employee and all other individuals for whom the employee reasonably expects to claim a personal exemption have minimum essential coverage for the taxable year other than in the individual market. Conditional Opt Out Payments are considered eligible and the compensation would not be considered a required employee contribution. As a result, employees would likely be ineligible for PTEs.

The IRS cautions employers against making Opt Out Payments because such payments increase the probability that employer sponsored coverage may not be affordable.

Court Finds Mailing of COBRA Notice Defeats Former Employee Claim of Non Receipt

In a recent employment discrimination lawsuit, Perkins v. Rock Tenn Services a former employee claimed her previous employer failed to provide her a COBRA election notice upon her resignation. The employer produced an electronic notice, along with computer records showing the dates on which the notice was created and mailed, and an affidavit from the employee responsible for mailing the COBRA notices. The Western District of Michigan ruled that the employer met its obligation to mail the COBRA notice to the former employee. The court found that the terminated employee's claim of nonreceipt of the notice did not mean the employer failed to comply with COBRA.

HIPAA Updates

Recent Resolution Agreements for Stolen Electronic Devices

The Office for Civil Rights ("OCR") announced an agreement with a HIPAA business associate after a smartphone containing PHI of hundreds of individuals was stolen. The phone was not encrypted or password protected, and the business associate had no policies addressing the removal of mobile devices containing PHI. The agreement requires a $650,000 payment from the business associate and a two year corrective action plan.

OCR also recently released a resolution agreement with a large public academic health center and research institute. In this case, two laptops and a thumb drive were stolen, affecting thousands of people. The investigation uncovered widespread vulnerability, including the storage of electronic PHI on a cloud based server without a business agreement. The resolution agreement required a $2.7 million payment from the health center and a three year corrective action plan.

Finally, Advocate Health Care agreed to a $5.5 million settlement—the largest ever against a single entity—with OCR and a two year corrective action plan. The settlement is the largest settlement against a single entity and is the result of a series of three breaches, one of which included an unencrypted laptop stolen from an unlocked car. OCR's investigation also revealed that Advocate Health Care failed to conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of potential risks and vulnerabilities, implement policies and procedures to limit physical access to electronic information systems housed in offsite storage, or execute a written business associate agreement that adequately protected PHI in the business associate's possession. The combined breaches affected the PHI of approximately 4 million individuals.

It is important that all covered entities and business associates give careful consideration to all aspects of their risk management plan. All HIPAA policies and procedures should contain clear protocols for when portable electronic devices are lost or stolen, and these protocols should be followed in the event of a potential breach.

HIPAA Releases Guidance Regarding Ransomware

OCR released guidance on July 11, 2016 regarding ransomware and HIPAA. Ransomware is a type of malware that essentially steals and encrypts data, thereby denying access to its rightful owners. After the attack occurs, the hacker demands a ransom from the rightful owner in exchange for the decryption key. The U.S. government reports that there are, on average, 4,000 ransomware attacks every day.

The guidance reiterated that covered entities and business associates must protect themselves against ransomware and all malware attacks pursuant to HIPAA. Therefore, covered entities and business associates should receive training to detect and report malware incidents. Under the HIPAA Security Rule, the presence of ransomware or malware on a covered entity's or business associate's computer is considered a security incident. Once the malware is detected, a security incident response must be initiated. Also, unless the covered entity or business associate can prove that there is a low probability that PHI has been compromised, the presence of malware is considered a breach and must be reported.

Sixth Circuit Finds Tax on ERISA Plans is Not Pre Empted by ERISA

In Self Insurance Institute (SIIA) v. Snyder, the Sixth Circuit held that a 1% tax on all claims paid in Michigan or for Michigan residents imposed on all carriers and third party administrators is not preempted by ERISA. SIIA brought the case against Michigan's governor on behalf of the sponsors and administrators of self funded ERISA benefit plans administered in Michigan. The court found that the law imposing the 1% tax does not directly regulate any integral aspects of ERISA and, at its core, is designed to generate revenue necessary to fund Michigan's obligations under Medicaid. The decision draws a distinction from the Gobeille decision by holding that state laws with an indirect effect on ERISA plans are not pre empted under ERISA. The court also found that the law imposing the 1% tax does not impermissibly alter the relationship between the plan and third party administrators, nor does it impermissibly "refer to" ERISA plans.

IRS Issues Proposed Guidance Regarding Reporting Under Code Section 6055

The IRS issued proposed regulations regarding coverage providers' information reporting of minimum essential coverage ("MEC") under Code section 6055.

  • Reporting of Coverage by Multiple MECs. The proposed regulations incorporate the reporting exceptions in the 2015 Instructions for the 1094 B and 1095 B for individuals covered by more than one MEC. Specifically, the proposed regulations provide:
    • If an individual is covered by more than one MEC made available by the same reporting entity, reporting is required for only one of the plans or programs.
    • Reporting is not required for an individual's MEC if the individual's eligibility is conditioned upon coverage by another MEC (sponsored by the same employer) for which section 6055 reporting is necessary.

In these instances, only the program that provides primary coverage is required to report. The two rules generally apply on a month to month basis. Therefore, in situations where an employee is covered by both an employer sponsored, self insured group health plan and an HRA, the employer need only report the group health plan coverage for the employee.

  • Soliciting Social Security Numbers. As part of Form 1095 reporting, employers must report the Social Security Number (SSN) of each covered person. An employer can be assessed penalties if it fails to fully complete the Form 1095. In previous guidance, the IRS provided that if an employer takes "reasonable efforts" to obtain the covered individual's SSN, such penalties can be waived for any reporting failures. Notice 2015 68 provided that an employer may avoid penalties for missing SSNs if it makes an initial solicitation and first and second annual solicitations for a SSN. The proposed regulations further clarify the steps necessary to demonstrate "reasonable efforts" by requiring that:
    • An account is opened on the date on which the employer receives an application for new coverage or an application to add an individual to existing coverage. The initial solicitation can be requested as part of the enrollment process.
    • The first annual solicitation be made within 75 days of opening the account. If the coverage is retroactive, the first annual solicitation must be made within 75 days after the determination of coverage was made.
    • The deadline for the second annual solicitation is December 31of the year after the year the account is opened.
    • For current enrollees, the account is considered open and an initial solicitation made if the employer requested the SSN at the time of enrollment or any time prior to July 29, 2016. Employers who have not made an initial solicitation prior to July 29, 2016 should do so as soon as possible.

IRS Releases Draft Forms 1094/1095 and Instructions

The IRS issued draft Forms 1094/1095 for the 2016 tax year. The draft forms do not include any significant changes from the 2015 tax year.

The draft instructions for the 1094 C and 1095 C were also released. The instructions are generally the same; however, there are a few clarifications, including:

  • Aggregated ALE Groups. Each individual ALE must file its own Form 1094 C (and associated 1095 Cs) under its own individual EIN number. Additionally, if a full time employee works for more than one ALE of an aggregated ALE group, only the ALE for which the employee works the most should report the employee.
  • Multiemployer Plan Relief. Multiemployer plan relief has been extended for another year. Employers qualifying for relief do not need to obtain eligibility or other information from their multiemployer plans for the 2016 plan year.
  • Codes for Coverage of Conditional Offers of Spousal Coverage. The draft instructions contain two new codes to reflect conditional offers of spousal coverage made to an employee.
  • COBRA and Post Employment Coverage. There are a few clarifications regarding COBRA coverage, including how to report the month in which an employee terminates employment with an ALE. Additionally, if an ALE offers post employment coverage to a former employee, that should not be reported as an offer of coverage.

Instructions for the B series forms are expected later this month.

Multi Department Request for Comment Regarding Accommodation for Religious Objections to Contraceptive Coverage

On May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court remanded Zubik v. Burwell to the lower courts in an attempt to find a compromise regarding nonprofit organizations' religious objections to covering contraceptives as mandated under the ACA. This decision also vacated and remanded seven appellate court decisions that upheld the regulatory accommodation offered by HHS, which was that HHS would provide contraceptive coverage to nonprofit organizations' employees or students. The Court held that the lower courts are in a better position to evaluate the facts and circumstances, and possible alternatives.

On July 21, 2016, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury released a request for information seeking further input from interested parties on possible alternatives to the current HHS accommodation. The Departments also requested "stakeholders" who are not parties to the litigation, such as insurers, third party administrators and women who need contraceptives, how any possible accommodations would affect them.

Employer Appeals of Marketplace Notices

Employers have begun receiving Marketplace Notices from the Health Insurance Marketplace Exchange notifying them that one or more of their employees is eligible for the premium tax credit in the Marketplace. The notice also describes an appeal process should the employer choose to dispute any inaccurate information in the notice. Employers may want to consider appealing to correct any misinformation contained in the notices, which could help employees avoid having to repay governmental subsidies to the IRS. Receipt of a Marketplace Notice does not automatically mean the IRS has or will assess a penalty on the employer. Also, failure to appeal the notice does not preclude the employer from later appealing an assessment of a penalty by the IRS.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.