United States: Is Bank Debt A Security?: Dangerous Implications Of The General Motors Litigation

Borrowers, agent banks, syndicate members and secondary market purchasers incur, syndicate, sell and buy bank debt on the assumption that bank debt is not a "security." However, a June 30, 2016, opinion in the General Motors preference litigation1 shows that such an assumption may no longer be valid, at least under the Bankruptcy Code. Whether the implications of the decision will penetrate the realm of the securities laws remains to be seen.

GM's term lenders had received $28 million in cash interest during the 90 days prior to GM's filing, and $1.5 billion in full payment during the bankruptcy, subject to disgorgement if the term lenders proved to be undersecured. As it happened, the agent for the term lenders had mistakenly released all personal property, other than fixtures, from the term loan's security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code. The Unsecured Creditors Committee sued to recover the payments as preferences.2

The interest recipients moved to dismiss under Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, arguing that the interest was either:

  • a "settlement payment, as defined in section 101 or 741 of [the Bankruptcy Code], made by or to (or for the benefit of) a . . . financial institution [or] financial participant" or
  • a "transfer made by or to (or for the benefit of) a financial institution [or] financial participant . . . in connection with a securities contract, as defined in section 741(7) [of the Bankruptcy Code].

(emphasis added).

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn denied the motion. He held that the payment of interest did not involve the extinguishment of a security and thus was not a "settlement payment," but he reasoned that payment of interest may qualify as a "transfer . . . in connection with a securities contract":

The Term Loan Investor Defendants contend that the tradeable interest in the Term Loan is akin to a publicly traded note or bond issued by a public company . . . The Term Loan Investor Defendants argue that the Term Loan and accompanying note were registered and assigned a CUSIP number . . . . Further, they argue that the interest in the Term Loan and accompanying note were widely traded and held by hundreds of different investors (i.e., part of a market). However . . . the current record provides no factual basis to support the defendants' argument. It is premature for the Court to make a determination on this issue at this time.

The 546(e) defense is actually not important to most interest payments. Interest paid on its scheduled date is a transfer "in the ordinary course" and thus not a voidable preference under Section 547(c)(2)3 – a defense Judge Glenn noted could be raised at a later time. Section 546(e) is important only to defend interest paid out of the ordinary course – i.e., late, or during a grace period.

Of much greater interest, however, are the implications of Judge Glenn's dicta on the status of bank debt as a security.

The legal basis for the assumption that bank debt is not a security is the Supreme Court case, Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56 (1990), and its limited (in this context) progeny, particularly Banco Espanol de Credito v. Security Pacific Nat. Bank, 973 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1992). Reves excluded notes from the definition of "security" based on four factors:

First, we examine . . . motivations . . . . If the seller's purpose is to raise money for the general use of a business enterprise or to finance substantial investments and the buyer is interested primarily in the profit the note is expected to generate, the instrument is likely to be a "security." Second, we examine the plan of distribution of the instrument to determine whether it is an instrument in which there is common trading for speculation or investment. Third, we examine the reasonable expectations of the investing public: The Court will consider instruments to be "securities" on the basis of such public expectations, even where an economic analysis of the circumstances of the particular transaction might suggest that the instruments are not "securities" as used in that transaction [citing as an example of a "security" 100% of the stock of a business sold to a single buyer]. Finally, we examine whether some factor such as the existence of another regulatory scheme significantly reduces the risk of the instrument, thereby rendering application of the Securities Acts unnecessary [citing bank certificates of deposit as notes regulated under banking laws].

(emphasis added).

Banco Espanol held that Security Pacific's sales of participations in short-term loans were not sales of "securities" because Security Pacific's motivation was diversification of risk, its plan of distribution was limited by the requirement of its consent for future transfers, the expectations of the buyers were that these loans were not securities and the Comptroller of the Currency's regulations relating to the sale of participations provided a substitute regulatory scheme.

The arguments of the GM Term Loan Defendants, however, and Judge Glenn's dicta, show that the world has changed since Reves and Banco Espanol. Today, bank loans are "distributed" and "trade" like, or almost like, securities. Bank loans are – or can be, in the words of the GM Term Loan Defendants – "widely traded and held by hundreds of different investors (i.e., part of a market)." Although not cited by the defendants, the governing law of New York provides that bank loans trade based on oral commitments to buy or sell, N.Y. General Obligations Law § 5-701b(2)(i), just like securities, U.C.C. § 8-113. Bank loans are often rated by Moody's, Standard & Poor's or Fitch – and some bank loan agreements (although not the GM Term Loan Agreement) require the borrower to obtain a rating.

Some distinctions remain. Banco Espanol held that participations were not securities, in part because they could not be transferred without the consent of the issuer. The same is true of the GM term loan – which could be transferred only with the agent's consent (and prior to an event of default, GM's consent).

In addition, publicly traded securities clear through the Depository Trust Co. (DTC). Bank loans clear through an administrative agent. This remains the case even when the bank loans have a CUSIP number. The Term Loan Defendants implied otherwise – they made much of the fact that the GM term loan had its own CUSIP – but in fact a bank-loan CUSIP is nothing more than an identifier. GM made payments to the holder of the term loan through its agent, not through DTC.

This latter distinction may be material in connection with Section 546(e), which was enacted primarily to protect DTC and its participants from liability arising from their receipt, and pass-through to beneficial holders, of payments later deemed to be preferences or constructively fraudulent transfers. Asserting a Section 546(e) defense may, in the end, be dangerous for the market as a whole and for the defendants who assert it – because the bank loan market does not and probably cannot operate if bank loans are securities.4

If bank loans are securities for general securities law purposes, then a borrower could not "issue" bank loans except through a public offering, a Rule 144A offering or other private placement. Bank loans are syndicated without any of the documentation or approvals required for securities issuance. Worse, the agent bank routinely knows more about the borrower, under its confidentiality agreement, than the syndicate members to whom it sells the loan. Selling syndicate members have access to confidential data rooms and therefore may know more than outside buyers do. Thus if a bank loan is a security, every syndicating agent and every selling member of the syndicate courts liability under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.5 Standard loan transfer agreements do contain disclaimers to eliminate such liability, but it is not clear whether such disclaimers will work where one party has truly material nonpublic information.

Even if the Bankruptcy Court ultimately concludes that the GM term loan was a securities contract under Section 546(e), and the decision is upheld on appeal, the determination would not necessarily carry over to the registration and insider trading provisions of the securities laws. Different regimes may accommodate different definitions of a "security." For example, commercial loans are routinely treated as a security under the Investment Company Act, even though the definitions of a "security" under the Investment Company Act and the Securities Act are substantially the same.6 Nonetheless, the Bankruptcy Court's decision on Section 546(e) deserves to be placed on the watchlist, because of its potentially far-reaching implications.


1 In re Motors Liquidation Company: Motors Liquidation Company Avoidance Action Trust v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Motions to Dismiss, Adv. Proc. Case No. 09-00504 Dkt. 643 (June 30, 2016) (MG) ("GM Decision").

2 Kramer Levin represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the General Motors bankruptcy generally, but not in the term loan litigation.

3 See Union Bank v. Wolas, 502 U.S. 151 (1991).

4 A syndicate member who receives a pre-bankruptcy interest payment and then sells its loan thus risks much and gains little from the application of Section 546(e). The defense shields only a quarterly or a monthly interest payment. If the bank loan trades down more than two to three points, the interest shielded may be less than damages courted for insider trading under the securities laws.

5 In the GM litigation, there is no risk of securities liability because any pre-bankruptcy transfer occurred in 2009, more than seven years ago, and the statute of limitations has long since expired.

6 See R. Rosenbloom, Investment Company Determination under the 1940 Act 31, 56-57 (2003).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions