United States: Miss Trademark USA: Beauty Pageant Naming Disputes

Last Updated: August 16 2016
Article by David A. Kluft

Just this month, two disputes over the trademark rights to beauty pageant names were resolved, pending appeal. In World Pageants LLC v. Miss G-String International LLC, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") dismissed an opposition to the registration of MISS G-STRING INTERNATIONAL because the opposer's mark (MISS NUDE INTERNATIONAL) just wasn't similar enough to cause confusion. Meanwhile, in Organizacion Miss America Latina v. Ramirez, the Southern District of California granted a default judgment to the organizers of the MISS U.S. LATINA pageant, who alleged that their former Texas affiliate had gone rogue and started using the MISS LATINA TEXAS mark for unauthorized activities.

Disputes over beauty pageant names appear to be relatively frequent. Most pageants identify themselves with the traditional naming convention of an honorific (Mr., Miss, etc.) followed by one or two additional words delineating the pageant's geographic scope and/or subject matter (such as the ethnicity or wardrobe of the contestants). When you combine this relatively narrow taxonomy with a crowded field of competitors, many of whom own multiple pageants and multiple pageant marks, you are bound to get litigation.

We were curious about the history of beauty pageant naming litigation, so we decided to gather together in one place the disputes that resulted in a written dispositive opinion (let us know if you think we missed any):

Miss Universe v. Patricelli (2d Cir. 1969). The Second Circuit defined the parameters of the beauty pageant trademark litigation genre by issuing a split decision in a dispute between the plaintiff, the MISS U.S.A. pageant, which was part of the MISS UNIVERSE network, and the defendant, a U.S. affiliate of the London-based MISS WORLD competition. The Second Circuit held that it was proper to preliminarily enjoin the defendant from using MISS U.S.A.-WORLD, but that it was improper to enjoin the defendant's use of the alternative MISS WORLD-U.S.A; the Court found that the latter mark — but not the former — was dominated by the distinguishing major element: "WORLD."

Miss America Pageant v. Miss America Brassiere Company (TTAB 1969). The MISS AMERICA pageant, which was founded in 1921, opposed a clothing company's application to register MISS AMERICA for lingerie. However, whereas the pageant didn't settle on its name until 1935 (it was previously the NATIONAL BEAUTY TOURNAMENT and the SHOWMEN'S VARIETY JUBILLEE OF ATLANTIC CITY), the clothing company had been marketing MISS AMERICA bras since 1926. The opposition was dismissed.

Palisades Pageants v. Miss America (C.C.P.A. 1971) The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (before it was replaced by the Federal Circuit) affirmed the decision of the United States Trademark Office to refuse registration of LITTLE MISS AMERICA. The TTAB found that the Jersey Shore-based pageant for girls ages five to ten was likely to be confused with the MISS AMERICA pageant.

Hal Jackson Associates v. Wortham (TTAB 1973). The MISS BLACK TEEN competition began as a regional New England contest sponsored by the local chapter of the N.A.A.C.P. MISS BLACK TEENAGE AMERICA, although it started several months later, was a televised event based in Atlanta, with national aspirations. The TTAB held that the variant wordings of the two pageants' names were "differences without a distinction" and denied registration of the Atlanta pageant's mark.

Miss Universe v. Drost (TTAB 1975). The MISS U.S.A. pageant organizers opposed an application to register MISS NUDE U.S.A., with the word "Nude" disclaimed. The TTAB held that the contemporaneous use of the two marks for nearly identical services was likely to create confusion, and sustained the opposition.

Stein v. Drost (TTAB 1975). The same applicant whose MISS NUDE U.S.A. mark was refused registration also applied to register MISS NUDE WORLD. The application was opposed by the operator of a preexisting MISS NUDE WORLD pageant which, although based in Canada, was endorsed by several U.S. nudist groups, some which conducted regional contests to pick candidates to send to Canada for the main competition. The TTAB found that these activities constituted sufficient use of the mark in U.S. commerce, and sustained the opposition.

National Teen-Ager v. Hovland (N.D. Ill. 1975). The Northern District of Illinois allowed the MISS NATIONAL TEEN-AGER pageant's motion to enjoin a former employee from using the NATIONWIDE TEENAGER mark.

Miss Universe v. Flesher (9th Cir. 1979). The Ninth Circuit held that the MISS NUDE U.S.A. pageant was likely to be confused with the MISS U.S.A. pageant and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the nude event's continued use of the name.

Miss Universe v. Miss Teen U.S.A. and Miss Universe v. Little Miss U.S.A. (N.D. Ga. 1980). In a pair of similar cases, the Northern District of Georgia enjoined the defendants' use of LITTLE MISS U.S.A. and MISS TEEN U.S.A., on the grounds that both were likely to be confused for affiliates of MISS U.S.A.

United States Olympic Committee v. International Federation of Bodybuilders (D. D.C. 1982). The Federal District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that, although the MR. OLYMPIA bodybuilding competition had improperly used the the Olympic Games rings and torch symbols, it was permitted to keep its name, especially in light of over a decade of use without any actual confusion.

Mecca Limited v. Patricelli (2d Cir. 1979). When the MISS WORLD-U.S.A pageant ended its affiliation with MISS WORLD, it changed its name to MISS VENUS WORLD U.S.A. The MISS WORLD organizers brought suit, and the pageant was ordered to drop the "WORLD." It became the MISS VENUS-U.S.A. pageant.

National Physique v. Amateur Athletic Union (S.D.N.Y. 1982). The organizer of a MISTER AMERICA bodybuilding contest moved to preliminarily enjoin a competitor from using the mark. The injunction was refused in light of the plaintiff's murky ownership claim and the fact that the defendant had been using the name for forty years.

Miss Universe v. Patricelli (2d Cir. 1985). MISS WORLD was satisfied that the organizer of MISS VENUS WORLD U.S.A. changed its name to MISS VENUS – U.S.A. However, the organizers of MISS U.S.A. were not so happy with the change, and brought a new lawsuit against the MISS VENUS- U.S.A. pageant. With reference to its 1969 Patricelli ruling, the Second Circuit found that the public was unlikely to be confused.

Miss World (UK) Limited v. Mrs. America Pageants (9th Cir. 1988). The Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court's refusal to grant an injunction against the defendant's use of MRS. OF THE WORLD, finding that the plaintiff's MISS WORLD mark was relatively weak and that there was insufficient evidence of confusion.

Miss Universe v. Pitts (W.D. La. 1989). On the motion of the organizers of the MISS UNIVERSE and MISS U.S.A. pageants, the Western District of Louisiana enjoined the defendants from developing a competing MRS. UNIVERSE and MRS. USA franchise.

American Dairy Queen Corp. v. New Line Productions (D. Minn. 1998). The DAIRY QUEEN ice cream company obtained an injunction against the use of the title DAIRY QUEENS for a planned mockumentary about beauty contests in rural Minnesota. The film was retitled Drop Dead Gorgeous.

Guillot v. Wagner (Ct. App. La. 1999). The Court of Appeal of Louisiana affirmed the refusal to enjoin the defendant's use of MISS JEFFERSON PARISH PAGEANT because the plaintiffs, owners of the MISS JEFFERSON PARISH SCHOLARSHIP PAGEANT, failed to introduce evidence other than the similarity of the names.

Miss Asia Beauty Pageant v. A.L. Models (TTAB 2000). A former sponsor of the MISS ASIA BEAUTY PAGEANT decided to go it alone and registered the MISS ASIAN WORLD BEAUTY PAGEANT mark. The TTAB found that the former sponsor had procured its registration by fraud, and allowed a petition to cancel the registration.

Miss Universe v. Rainbow Productions(TTAB 2004). The MISS TEEN USA pageant opposed Rainbow Production's application to register MISS T-GIRL USA for "gay beauty pageants." The applicant failed to present evidence of the meaning of "T-GIRL" and, in the absence of such evidence, the TTAB held that the marks shared overall similar commercial impressions. The opposition was sustained.

Goldfaden v. Miss World (D. N.J. 2005). When Gerald Goldfaden registered the MISS WORLD WIDE WEB mark for conducting online beauty contests, he bought himself years of litigation in various fora with the MISS WORLD pageant. In this round, the District of New Jersey denied MISS WORLD's motions for summary judgment against Goldfaden's declaratory judgment complaint.

Miss Universe v. Community Marketing (TTAB 2007). The organizers of the MISS UNIVERSE pageant opposed registration of MR. GAY UNIVERSE. The TTAB sustained the opposition, citing the widespread notoriety of the MISS UNIVERSE mark and holding that the relevant public was likely to assume a common source.

Miss Universe v. Villegas (S.D.N.Y. 2009). The MISS USA pageant brought an action to put a stop to the MISS ASIA USA pageant. The Southern District of New York granted judgment for the defendants, finding that the overall commercial impressions were different.

Mrs. United States National Pageant v. Richardson (TTAB 2009). An application to register MRS. U.S. INTERNATIONAL for pageants was opposed by the owners of the MRS. UNITED STATES NATIONAL PAGEANT mark. The TTAB found that the marks were more similar than dissimilar and refused registration.

Mrs. United States National Pageant v. Miss United States of America Organization (W.D.N.Y. 2012). The owner of the MRS. UNITED STATES mark brought suit against the MISS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA pageant. The Western District of New York held that "OF AMERICA" did not sufficiently distinguish the marks and granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.

Miss Lebanon v. Kayrouz (E.D. Mich. 2013). When the MISS LEBANON EMIGRANT contest of New Jersey brought suit against the organizer of the MISS LEBANON EMIGRANTS beauty pageant of Michigan, the defendant decided to discontinue using the name and a quick settlement in principle was reached by email. When the defendant changed her mind, the Eastern District of Michigan enforced the email settlement agreement.

In re Mason (TTAB 2013). An application to register MISS COSMOS was refused in light of a preexisting registration for the MISS CHINESE COSMOS PAGEANT. Because both marks contained the words "MISS" and "COSMOS" in the same order, the TTAB found that they were likely to be confused for one another and affirmed the refusal.

Harrison Productions v. Harris (TTAB 2015). The MISS AMERICAN BEAUTY pageant filed a petition to cancel the AMERICAN BEAUTY pageant mark on the grounds of fraud, claiming that the event purportedly promoted by the respondent never actually took place. The TTAB found that this was not sufficient proof of a knowingly false statement and dismissed the petition.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
25 Oct 2017, Webinar, Boston, United States

Foley Hoag will present a 60-minute webinar on Wednesday, October 25 at 12:30 pm EDT, offering guidance for in-house counsel regarding the basics of trademark and design protection in the European Union. Attendees will learn about the opportunities and pitfalls to be on the lookout for when looking to secure, protect, and enforce an IP portfolio overseas.

1 Nov 2017, Webinar, Boston, United States

Please join Foley Hoag on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 for a webinar that covers the details of drafting an appropriate arbitration clause for your company’s commercial contracts.

9 Nov 2017, Conference, Waltham, United States

Please join us on Thursday, November 9 at the Westin Waltham Hotel for our quarterly New England M&A Forum, which brings the latest in market trends and recent legal developments to the New England M&A professionals' community.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.