United States: The EEOC's New Focus On LGBTQ Discriminat Ion: How To Stay Out Of The Headlines

The year 2015 was a breakthrough year for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community. Just over a year ago, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision on marriage equality, extending marriage rights to same-sex couples nationwide. Caitlyn Jenner focused the nation's attention on the transgender community, with her public coming out and transition. President Obama became the first president to mention the word "transgender" in the State of the Union address, and the White House made a gender-neutral restroom available for the first time. Even Donald Trump has apparently jumped on the bandwagon, as he was the first Republican nominee to mention "LGBTQ" issues in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention. But the legal landscape for the LGBTQ community is far from settled. Recently, the North Carolina state legislature passed HB-2, which, among other things, eliminated anti-discrimination measures for LGBTQ people and required transgender individuals to use bathrooms in state facilities that correspond to the gender assigned to them at birth. Along with Tennessee and Arkansas, North Carolina also banned municipalities from passing anti-discrimination measures.

In other states, because Congress has not passed federal legislation banning discrimination in employment based on sexual orientation and gender identity, there exists a hodgepodge of anti-discrimination measures. Twenty-two states offer protections based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity, while 28 states offer no employment protections for LGBTQ individuals.

Against this backdrop, there has been increased public pressure on employers to provide protections for their LGBTQ employees, and there is heightened awareness of employers' anti-discrimination and diversity practices amongst employees and the general public. A recent national annual survey of in-house counsel, human resources professionals, and C-level executives found that almost three-quarters of respondents cited an increased number of discrimination claims by LGBTQ people as one of their chief concerns for the coming year. That represents a substantial increase from the 31 percent of respondents who cited the same concern in 2015.

With this increased public attention, employers' concerns about sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination complaints are well founded. As the survey highlighted, the concern may be animated in part by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) becoming increasingly active in bringing LGBTQ-related actions against employers. In particular, the EEOC has recently filed a series of high-profile lawsuits involving sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination.

This article explores the background of the EEOC's involvement in LGBTQ-related cases, summarizes the key developments in the recent filings, and offers some recommendations for employers seeking to develop best practices for their LGBTQ employees.

For employers in California or the other 21 states (and D.C.) with state employment laws already prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, the EEOC developments do not radically change the ways in which employers must comply with anti-discrimination measures. While the EEOC decisions and lawsuits may provide additional federal avenues of recovery, employers should, practically speaking, already have protections in place to comply with these existing state laws. You may visit www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps to see the current employment non-discrimination laws in your state.


The EEOC is charged with enforcing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). Title VII prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of "race, color, religion, sex, and national origin." The EEOC has not historically brought sexual orientation cases under Title VII. But in July 2015, on the heels of the Supreme Court's decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide, the EEOC announced for the first time that it considered sexual orientation discrimination to be covered by Title VII's prohibition against sex discrimination.

In that case, Baldwin v. Foxx, an air traffic control specialist filed an EEOC complaint against the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). He claimed that he was not selected for a permanent position as a front line manager with the agency because of his sexual orientation. He alleged that he was told that discussions about his male partner were "a distraction" and that his colleagues did not need to "hear about that gay stuff."

When considering claims of sexual orientation discrimination, the EEOC decided that sexual orientation discrimination is covered under sex discrimination because (1) "sexual orientation is premised on sex-based preferences, assumptions, expectations, stereotypes, or norms"; (2) sexual orientation "cannot be defined or understood without reference to sex"; and (3) sexual orientation discrimination arises out of animus toward employees as a result of their associational relationships with others of the same sex. The EEOC stressed that it was not creating a new class of claims but instead highlighting that allegations of sexual orientation discrimination, by their very nature, "necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex."1

Even before the EEOC considered sexual orientation discrimination to be covered under Title VII's prohibition against sex discrimination, it also considered anti-transgender bias and discrimination to be covered as well. In a 2012 EEOC decision, Macy v. Holder, the EEOC followed the lead of a number of federal courts in upholding transgender rights under Title VII. The EEOC held that "because the term 'gender' encompasses not only a person's biological sex but also the cultural and social aspects associated with masculinity and femininity," a transgender employee "may establish a prima facie case of sex discrimination" under Title VII.2

Having decided that both sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination fell within the purview of Title VII, the EEOC announced that combatting discrimination on both of these issues was one of its main priorities. As part of its enforcement priority to "address emerging and developing issues," the EEOC has committed, in particular, to bringing Title VII actions against employers that discriminate against their LGBTQ employees.3

EEOC TESTS ITS THEORY: Scott Medical Health Center and IFCO Systems

On March 1, 2016, the EEOC filed its first two cases based on its theory that sexual orientation discrimination is prohibited under Title VII's prohibition against sex discrimination. In EEOC v. Scott Medical Health Center, the EEOC alleged that the defendant constructively discharged a telemarketing manager by creating a sexually hostile work environment. The plaintiff, a gay male, was allegedly subjected to a wide variety of unwelcome comments about his sexual orientation, including "fag," "faggot," and "queer," three to four times a week. His supervisor also allegedly inquired about the plaintiff's sex life and the normative gender roles that each partner played in the plaintiff's relationship. The EEOC alleged that the defendant refused to take action when the plaintiff brought the issues to the attention of management and that they thus created a hostile work environment for the plaintiff.

For damages, the EEOC sought an injunction enjoining the company's management from engaging in discriminatory employment practices, a directive to create new training and policy programs to eliminate hostile working environments, and compensation for the plaintiff's monetary and non-monetary costs. The case is pending in the Western District of Pennsylvania.4

In the other case filed in March, EEOC v. IFCO Systems, the EEOC alleged that a lesbian employee had been unlawfully discriminated against, was subjected to harassment, and was retaliated against for complaining about the harassment. According to the EEOC, the employee began working the night shift soon after beginning her job with IFCO Systems. Her night shift manager harassed her on a weekly basis, stating that he would like to change her sexual orientation, telling her she did not have breasts, and stating that he wanted to turn her "back into a woman." He also quoted bible passages to her, which he claimed were opposed to her identity, and he touched his genitals while speaking to her.

Just three months after the lawsuit was filed, the EEOC negotiated a $202,000 settlement in the IFCO Systems case, marking the first resolution of a sexual orientation discrimination case filed by the EEOC under Title VII. The settlement included a $20,000 donation to the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, a training program for top managers, and the retention of an expert on LGBTQ workplace issues.5

While the outcome of Scott Medical Health Center is still unknown, the quick and robust settlement in IFCO Systems likely means that the EEOC has found some momentum with its Title VII strategy and will continue to file similar sexual orientation discrimination cases.


Since its 2012 decision that gender identity discrimination is covered under Title VII, the EEOC has consistently brought lawsuits on behalf of transgender employees, alleging sex discrimination under Title VII. The EEOC has seen repeated success in this area and has achieved settlements of $115,000 and $150,000 in two cases filed in 2014 and 2015. In one of these cases, the EEOC also received a consent decree that the defendant would not exclude health care benefits for medically necessary care arising from a transgender individual's transition or related health issues.6

The EEOC continues to be active in pursuing gender identity discrimination cases and has recently filed a number of high-profile cases.

On July 6, 2016, the EEOC sued Bojangles Restaurants on behalf of a transgender woman who was allegedly subjected to derogatory comments about her gender identity and appearance. The woman was asked to engage in stereotypically male behaviors and grooming practices, even though the woman clearly identified as female to her supervisors. When the comments did not abate, she complained and was subsequently terminated. The EEOC seeks injunctive relief, back pay, compensatory damages, and punitive damages.7

Also, on July 18, 2016, the EEOC sued Rent-A-Center East on behalf of another transgender woman who was allegedly terminated because of her gender identity. The woman identified and presented as male when she was first employed with the company but transitioned to female during her employment. She informed her supervisors that she was in the midst of a gender transition. The EEOC alleges that the defendant then successfully manufactured a pretext for terminating her but that the ultimate reason for her dismissal was her gender transition.8

Accessing gender neutral bathrooms has been another major area of litigation for transgender individuals and may continue to grow in prominence following North Carolina's bill restricting such use. The EEOC held in Lusardi v. Department of the Army that Title VII requires employers to provide transgender individuals with equal access to a common restroom that matches their gender identity. Furthermore, employers cannot fulfill this obligation by providing a single-use restroom stall specifically for transgender employees because it would deny the individual access to resources available to others, segregate the individual from other persons with the same gender identity, and lead the individual to feel unequal and disrespected.9


One main takeaway for all employers is that the state of anti-discrimination laws for the LGBTQ community remains in flux. While the EEOC is strongly committed to the idea that Title VII provides protection against sexual orientation discrimination, the federal courts are not in complete agreement. Some courts have accepted the EEOC's Baldwin decision and applied Title VII to sexual orientation while others have expressly repudiated the decision. Unless and until there is more definitive guidance from federal courts about Title VII's applicability to sexual orientation cases, or until Congress passes a federal LGBTQ non-discrimination law, employers will have to contend with a state of legal limbo.

Practically speaking, given that the EEOC has demonstrated its commitment to bringing prominent lawsuits against sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination, employers may want to take the following steps to minimize their risk of being the subject of the EEOC's next major lawsuit:

  • Ensure that any transgender employee has access to a common restroom that matches his or her own gender identity. Employers should not ask for proof of any surgical or other medical procedure to confirm the employee's presented identity;10
  • Develop and maintain corporate policies that prohibit consideration of sexual orientation and gender identity in hiring, promotion, and retention considerations;
  • Modify orientation programs, training sessions, and employee handbooks to clarify that anti-harassment measures apply to LGBTQ employees; " Ensure that benefit programs are available in equal measure to all employees, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, and allow transgender employees to use benefit programs and leave policies for any transition-related medical needs; and
  • Develop affinity groups for LGBTQ employees to enable them to discuss their needs and concerns, maintain an open door to hear about employees' concerns, and ensure that there is a meaningful process through which to discuss and address such concerns. The EEOC will clearly continue to maintain its focus on cases involving discrimination against LGBTQ employees. To ensure that they are minimizing their risk in this area, employers may want to continue monitoring these developments.

To view prior issues of the ELC, click here.


1 See Complainant, EEOC DOC 0120133080, 2015 WL 4397641 (July 15, 2015).

2 See Mia Macy, EEOC DOC 0120120821, 2012 WL 1435995 (Apr. 20, 2012).

3 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Strategic Enforcement Plan, FY 2013-2016, available at https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/plan/sep.cfm.

4 EEOC v. Scott Medical Health Center, No. 2:16-cv-00225-CB, 2016 WL 822096 (W.D. Pa. March 1, 2016).

5 EEOC v. Pallet Companies d/b/a IFCO Systems NA, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00595-RDB, 2016 WL 822896 (D. Md. March 1, 2016); settlement discussions at News Release, 2016 WL 3518330 (EEOC), June 28, 2016. 6 See EEOC v. Deluxe Financial Services Corp., No. 0:15-cv-02646-ADM-SER (D. Minn. June 4, 2015); EEOC v. Lakeland Eye Clinic, P.A., No. 8:14-cv-2421-T35 AEP (M.D. Fla. Sept. 25, 2014).

7 See News Release, 2016 WL 3626510 (EEOC).

8 See EEOC v. Rent-a-Center East, Inc., No. 16-cv-2222 (C.D. Ill. July 18, 2016).

9 Lusardi v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120133395, 2015 WL 1607756 (Mar. 27, 2015).

10 See Lusardi.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.