ARTICLE
3 August 2016

Food Manufacturer Sued For Allegedly Deceptive " Slack-Fill "

KM
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Contributor

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP (KMT) maintains an extensive practice, with an international client base, in the rapidly developing fields of Internet, telemarketing and mobile marketing law, sweepstakes and promotions law, gambling, fantasy sports and gaming law, data and consumer privacy law, intellectual property law and general corporate law.
Likewise, as the above-referenced case demonstrates, class action plaintiffs seek out and target manufacturers with allegedly non-compliant slack-fill practices.
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Last Thursday, four New York City residents commenced a federal lawsuit and prospective class action against the world's leading pasta maker, Barilla S.p.A., and its subsidiaries Barilla America, Inc. and Barilla USA (collectively, "Barilla"), alleging that Barilla engaged in deceptive "slack-fill" to deceive consumers as to the amount of pasta in its boxes.

Should food manufacturers be concerned about their product packaging?

Barilla's Product Packaging

Barilla has introduced a variety of specialized pastas in recent years to complement its traditional offerings, including gluten-free, whole grain, high-protein and "white fiber" variations.

According to the Plaintiffs' Complaint, although the volume and net weight of Barilla's pasta boxes varies between varieties, each box of a given Barilla pasta (e.g., spaghetti) appears to be the same size when displayed on the supermarket shelf.

Barilla Sued for Allegedly Deceptive Slack-Fill

On July 28, 2016, Alessandro Berni, Giuseppe Santochirico, Massimo Simioli, and Domenico Salvati sued Barilla in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Case No. 1:16-cv-04196) for engaging in allegedly deceptive "slack-fill" – the practice of including excessive, non-functional empty space in product packaging – purportedly in violation of New York's unfair and deceptive practices statute. The lawsuit claims that Barilla sells certain boxes of pasta that are up to 25% empty, despite the fact that those boxes appear to contain the same amount of pasta as boxes of Barilla's traditional pasta.

The Plaintiffs are seeking class certification on behalf of "[a]ll purchasers of Barilla 'Gluten Free,' 'Whole Grain,' 'ProteinPLUS,' and 'White Fiber' pastas who purchased the products for personal, family, or household use."

How Risky Is Your Product Packaging?

Regulatory agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and various state attorney general's offices, monitor manufacturers' use of slack-fill and may take action against violators. Likewise, as the above-referenced case demonstrates, class action plaintiffs seek out and target manufacturers with allegedly non-compliant slack-fill practices. As such, manufacturers' product packaging, marketing and related business practices should be carefully reviewed by an attorney experienced with consumer product law and class action litigation.

L'Oreal Settles Deceptive Advertising Suit with the Federal Trade Commission

Subway Settles Sandwich Length Deceptive Trade Practices Lawsuit

FTC Orders Beverage Company to Change Labeling

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More