ARTICLE
1 August 2016

Administrative Proceeding Rules Changed To Include Added Depositions, Flexibility

KL
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Contributor

Kramer Levin provides its clients proactive, creative and pragmatic solutions that address today’s most challenging legal issues. The firm is headquartered in New York with offices in Silicon Valley and Paris and fosters a strong culture of involvement in public and community service. For more information, visit www.kramerlevin.com
After requesting comment on potential changes in September 2015, the SEC adopted amendments to its rules of practice governing its administrative proceedings.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

After requesting comment on potential changes in September 2015, the SEC adopted amendments to its rules of practice governing its administrative proceedings. Chair Mary Jo White said the changes provide additional opportunities to conduct depositions while also adding flexibility to the timelines for the proceedings, which have been the target of criticism and constitutional court challenges. The adopted final amendments:

  • Extend the potential length of the prehearing period from the current four months to a maximum of 10 months for the cases designated for the longest timelines;
  • Allow parties in the cases designated for the longest timelines the right to notice three depositions per side in single-respondent cases and five depositions per side in multi-respondent cases, and to request an additional two depositions;
  • Clarify the types of dispositive motions that may be filed at various stages of proceedings and the applicable procedures and legal standards for the motions; and
  • Make additional clarifying and conforming changes to other rules, including rules regarding the admissibility of certain types of evidence, expert disclosures and reports, the requirements for the contents of an answer, and procedures for appeals.

The SEC has increasingly prosecuted cases in front of administrative judges rather than federal court in recent years, partly due to enhanced powers included in Dodd-Frank.
Link To Article

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More