United States: FTC Drops Challenge Of West Virginia Hospital Merger

Last Updated: July 20 2016
Article by Tracey L. Klein and John A. Kramp

On July 6, 2016, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") decided to dismiss its administrative complaint challenging Cabell Huntington Hospital's ("Cabell Huntington") proposed acquisition of St. Mary's Medical Center ("St. Mary's") in Huntington, West Virginia.  The FTC's statement, makes clear that the FTC decided to drop its challenge after West Virginia passed Senate Bill 597, which allows for certain transactions between teaching hospitals, such as Cabell Huntington, and one or more hospitals.  The general purpose of the legislation is to provide a framework under which a transaction would be blessed by the West Virginia Health Care Authority and potentially be sheltered from an FTC challenge because of the state action antitrust immunity.

Emboldened by a string of victories in recent years, the FTC has filed an increasing number of enforcement actions against mergers it perceives as anticompetitive.  Some states, most notably West Virginia, have enacted or considered enacting Certificate of Public Advantage ("COPA") statutes.  While it is unclear if state COPA statutes provide the requisite state supervision to ward off an FTC challenge, the FTC's decision to dismiss its administrative complaint is a positive step for hospitals considering similar transactions.  Dismissal of the Cabell Huntington-St. Mary's challenge, combined with the FTC's recent losses in federal district courts in FTC v. Penn State Hershey Medical Center and FTC v. Advocate Health Care Network, indicates that more mergers may be feasible in the current regulatory environment.

The FTC has also challenged state Certificate of Need ("CON") laws by arguing that they restrict price and competition and suppress innovation in health care.  COPA statutes differ from CON laws in that CON laws usually mandate that hospitals and other health care providers apply for and receive a CON before moving forward with particular projects; whereas, COPA statutes provide an option for hospitals and other health care providers that wish to obtain immunity against federal antitrust law.

Cabell Huntington-St. Mary's Merger

Cabell Huntington first announced its agreement with St. Mary's in November 2014.  One year later, the FTC filed an administrative complaint to block the merger, alleging that the combined entity would have a near monopoly over general acute care inpatient hospital services and outpatient surgical services in the four-county region surrounding Huntington.  Only a few months later, the West Virginia Legislature passed Senate Bill 597 in an effort to provide state immunity protection for the transaction.  The FTC alleges the combined organizations would have a greater than 75% market share of general acute care inpatient hospital services.

COPA and State Action Immunity Basics

In general, COPA statutes authorize state bodies to approve cooperative transactions between competitors and potentially provide immunity from federal antitrust enforcement actions.  Private parties wishing to merge or enter into other collaborative agreements apply to a legislatively created state body for a COPA.  State COPA statutes nearly always mandate that deal documents be reviewed by a state body before making a determination of whether a transaction is more beneficial than harmful to competition.  If the state body determines that the transaction meets the qualifications set forth in the relevant COPA statute and any applicable regulations or subregulatory guidance, a COPA may be issued.  Obtaining a COPA may be beneficial for parties expecting a review by the FTC because state action immunity may provide additional protection should the FTC decide to file an administrative complaint.  Even if certain COPA statutes may not survive judicial scrutiny, obtaining a COPA may serve as a deterrent to the FTC filing an administrative complaint.

State action immunity is grounded in a line of decisions from the United States Supreme Court exempting state action from federal antitrust statutes.  State action immunity extends to nonstate actors carrying out a state's regulatory program.  For state action immunity to extend to private parties, the parties must act pursuant to a "clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed" state policy and "be actively supervised by the State."  Cal. Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97, 105 (1980) (citations omitted).

The Supreme Court has recently narrowed the two prongs of state action immunity.  First, a clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed state policy needs to be explicit in the statute.  FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health Sys., Inc., 133 S. Ct. 1003 (2013).  Second, state supervision requires more than the state being in control of the program.  For example, a North Carolina state board controlled by a majority of market participants did not have sufficient state supervision to receive state action immunity.  N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs v. FTC , 135 S. Ct. 1101 (2015).  In North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners, six members of the eight‑member licensing board were licensed dentists.  The Court, noting how market participants have economic incentives to constrain competition, found that a board controlled by market participants did not constitute state supervision.  The Court did not articulate a clear test for active state supervision.


It remains unclear whether state COPA statutes, including Wisconsin Statutes section 150.85, would withstand judicial scrutiny.  If COPA statutes survive judicial scrutiny, hospitals, health systems and other health care providers would have one more option to strengthen their antitrust defenses in advance of a transaction; however, COPA statutes that have not been challenged in court can still serve as a deterrent to an FTC challenge.

The FTC continues to criticize state legislatures for enacting legislation intended to confer state action immunity to transactions between health care providers.  The Horizontal Merger Guidelines recognize that mergers may produce lower prices, improved quality or new products.  These benefits, which must be merger-specific, must be evaluated and weighed against potential anticompetitive harm.  A transaction that produces merger-specific benefits that outweigh potential anticompetitive harm will not be challenged.  Thus, the FTC reasons, state action immunity can only provide protection to anticompetitive transactions that would adversely impact competition.

In its decision to dismiss its administrative complaint, the FTC did not state its rationale for dismissing the complaint.  However, the FTC temporarily withdrew the matter from adjudication on March 24, 2016 to "evaluate the impact, if any, of the state legislation."  Presumably, the FTC concluded that Senate Bill 597 included sufficient state supervision to provide immunity from federal antitrust law.

Even though questions remain regarding the ability of COPA statutes to withstand judicial scrutiny, West Virginia's Senate Bill 597 may provide a roadmap for states that wish to provide state action immunity to certain transactions between health care providers.  Additionally, the FTC's losing streak and apparent deference to state legislation in the Cabell Huntington-St. Mary's merger bodes well for hospitals around the United States considering similar transactions.  As Deborah Feinstein, director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, indicated at the 2016 American Bar Association's Antitrust in Healthcare conference, "[u]ltimately states are sovereign entities and if they want to pass these laws that exempt the mergers from the antitrust laws with active state supervision, then that [is] the end of the discussion."

Additional Questions and Assistance

This may be one of the best times in recent history for hospitals and other health care providers to consider a merger or other transaction.  It is critical that you consult with legal counsel early on to minimize the risk of an antitrust challenge from the FTC and to proactively develop defenses, one of which could involve attempting to obtain state action immunity.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Tracey L. Klein
John A. Kramp
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions