Senator Encourages SEC To Finalize Liquidity And Derivatives Proposals

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
In short, regulators must always remember that regulation is a two-edged – and perhaps even a three-edged – sword.
United States Finance and Banking

Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) urged the SEC to finalize its recently proposed rules concerning liquidity risk for open-end funds and derivatives use by investment companies, and offered several recommendations for improving market transparency and stability.

Senator Brown recommended that the SEC:

  • consider providing more explicit instructions on how to (i) classify assets and (ii) determine whether a fund's asset classification is reasonable;
  • implement procedures for enhancing the analysis of fund data and disclosures;
  • complement the fund liquidity rule by finalizing a "strong rule" regarding the use of derivatives by investment companies;
  • consider issuing "additional guidance for fund managers as part of the proposed rule on derivatives," particularly with respect to assessing and determining the risk-based coverage amount of segregated assets; and
  • require the use of clear and risk-based coverage amounts predicated on a prescribed methodology, and, wherever possible, provide uniform guidance on how to determine stressed conditions.

Senator Brown urged the SEC to "remain focused on preventing potential threats to financial stability arising from illiquid market conditions or excessive leverage."

Commentary

Because mutual funds are the primary means by which retail investors access the securities market directly, the cost impact of these rules largely will fall on such investors, since it will reduce the returns they receive on their holdings of mutual funds. Accordingly, the regulators should consider the following questions: (i) are the costs appropriate, (ii) are the quantitative tests that are imposed by the regulations good measures of risk, or are they so crudely constructed that they end up increasing risk by discouraging the use of derivatives to hedge, and (iii) will the costs end up driving investors into the private fund market? In short, regulators must always remember that regulation is a two-edged – and perhaps even a three-edged – sword.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More