United States: Second Circuit Holds A National Bank's Citizenship Is Determined Exclusively By Location Of Main Office, Not Principal Place Of Business

For purposes of assessing the existence of federal subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship, national banking associations—i.e., corporate entities chartered not by any State, but by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, an independent bureau of the US Treasury—are deemed to be citizens of the State in which they are "located."1 In 2006, in Wachovia Bank v. Schmidt, the US Supreme Court held that a national bank is "located" in, and thus a citizen of, the State designated in its articles of association as the locus of its designated "main office," but is not additionally "located" in, and thus a citizen of, every State in which it has established a branch.2 The Supreme Court, however, left open whether a national bank might also be considered a citizen of the State of its principal place of business, if its principal place of business were located in a different State than its main office, observing that such treatment would be necessary to achieve jurisdictional parity between national and state-chartered banks.3 In OneWest Bank, N.A. v. Melina, No. 15-3063, 2016 WL 3548346 (2d Cir. June 29, 2016), the Second Circuit agreed with the other Circuit Courts to have considered that question post-Wachovia and held that a national bank is a citizen only of the State listed in its articles of association as its main office, and not also of any other State where it may have its principal place of business.4 In so holding, the OneWest Court rejected the notion that the concept of jurisdictional parity should be read into the relevant statutes. As a result, insofar as national banks can be deemed to be a citizen of one and only one State, they will be in a preferred position vis-à-vis state-chartered banks, which can be deemed to be citizens of more than one State, for purposes of invoking diversity jurisdiction within the Second Circuit.


OneWest Bank, N.A. ("OneWest") is a national bank whose main office is in California. In September 2014, it commenced a foreclosure action in the Eastern District of New York against Robert Melina, a citizen of New York, invoking the court's diversity jurisdiction. In response to OneWest's motion for summary judgment, Melina moved to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, contending that OneWest's principal place of business was New York, meaning that there was no diversity of citizenship between the parties. The district court (Gleeson, J.) denied Melina's motion and granted OneWest's motion for summary judgment. The District Court held, inter alia, that a national bank is a citizen only of the State in which its main office is located.

The OneWest Decision

On appeal, Melina argued, among other things, that a national bank should be deemed to be a citizen not only of the State designated as its main office, but also of the State of its principal place of business, in order to "maintain parity between national and state banks."5  Specifically, State banks, usually chartered as corporate bodies by a particular State, ordinarily are subject to the prescription of the diversity statute, whereby a State bank is deemed to be a citizen of the State "by which it has been incorporated" and also of the State "where it has its principal place of business."6

The Second Circuit noted that in the first statute to address the citizenship of national banks, enacted in 1882, Congress did provide for jurisdictional parity between national and state-chartered banks.7  However, the language tying national bank jurisdiction to state bank jurisdiction was removed in 1887. Thereafter, including through the current version of § 1348, enacted in 1948, Congress provided that the citizenship of a national bank is deemed to be that of the State in which it is "located." That language was not subsequently changed, notwithstanding the adoption in 1958 of a provision (now codified in § 1332(c)(1)) providing that state-chartered corporations—which include state-chartered banks—are citizens of both their State of incorporation and the State of their principal place of business.8

The Second Circuit explained that the meaning of a statute's terms is to be determined as of the time it became law.9  Thus, because the statutory concept of "principal place of business" did not exist when § 1348 was enacted, the term "located" as used in that statute could not be read as providing for subject matter jurisdiction in reference to a national bank's principal place of business.10  The Second Circuit further observed that whether jurisdictional parity between national and state banks ought to be revived by way of an amendment to § 1348 is a policy question for Congress, not the federal courts.11 Accordingly, the Second Circuit concluded that only the location of OneWest's main office was relevant for purposes of assessing the existence of diversity jurisdiction.12

The Significance of OneWest

The OneWest decision was a per curiam opinion, perhaps suggesting that the question presented was more straightforward than some had argued. Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Wachovia, the Fifth and Seventh Circuits had held that § 1348 should be interpreted in light of § 1332 in order to honor the principle of jurisdictional parity.13 The question has also become increasingly prevalent in recent decades with the rise of interstate branching by national banks. Federal law was amended in 1994 to permit interstate branching through acquisition14 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act further expanded the interstate branching capabilities of national banks by relaxing restrictions on de novo interstate branching.15 In any event, the question is now settled in the Second Circuit.

It is also worth keeping in mind that the jurisdictional parity debate is a matter that concerns diversity jurisdiction alone. Nothing in the reasoning of OneWest or the other decisions discussed above has any bearing on a national bank's ability or inability to invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court on federal question grounds. This includes, for example, removal from state courts under the Edge Act, which provides that civil suits to which a corporation organized under the laws of the United States (e.g., a national bank) is a party and which arise out of certain types of offshore banking transactions or financial operations are "deemed to arise under" federal law.16


1 28 U.S.C. § 1348.

2 See 546 US 303, 307 (2006).

3 See id. at 315-17 & nn. 8, 9.

4 See, e.g., Rouse v. Wachovia Mortg., FSB, 747 F.3d 707, 708 (9th Cir. 2014); Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. WMR e-PIN, LLC, 653 F.3d 702, 706- 10 (8th Cir. 2011).

5 OneWest, at 12.

6 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1).

7 OneWest, at 9.

8 See id. at 9-10.

9 Id. at 10 (citing MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 512 US 218, 228 (1994)).

10 Id. The OneWest Court stated that the Second Circuit's dicta in World Trade Center Properties, L.L.C. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, 354 F.3d 154, 161 (2d Cir. 2003) (a national bank "is deemed to be a citizen of every state in which it has offices"), had been abrogated by the Supreme Court's decision in Wachovia

11 OneWest, at 11.

12 The OneWest Court also concluded that the district court had, in any event, correctly held that OneWest's principal place of business was, like its main office, in California. In this connection, the Second Circuit rejected Melina's argument that OneWest's principal place of business was New York because, at the time the complaint was filed, OneWest's parent company was being purchased by a company headquartered in New York. In particular, the Second Circuit held that a subsidiary has its own principal place of business for diversity purposes unless it is merely an "alter ego" or agent of the parent company, and that, relatedly, a subsidiary does not assume the principal place of business of its future corporate parent solely as a result of its subsidiary status. See OneWest, at 13-15.

13 See Horton v. Bank One, N.A., 387 F.3d 426, 435 (5th Cir. 2004); Firstar Bank, N.A. v. Faul, 253 F.3d 982, 988 (7th Cir. 2001).

14 See Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-328, 108 Stat. 2338 (Sept. 29, 1994).

15 Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, § 613 (July 21, 2010).

16 See 12 U.S.C. § 632.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions