Maximising Success In UDRP Complaints

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is designed to address cases of abusive domain name registration and use.
United States Intellectual Property

The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is designed to address cases of abusive domain name registration and use. Since 1999, approximately 88% of all cases decided at the two most frequently used UDRP arbitration forums–the World Intellectual Property Organisation and the National Arbitration Forum–have resulted in the transfer or cancellation of the domain name(s) at issue. Because so many cybersquatters operate in secrecy, domain name registrants often do not contest a UDRP complaint led against them. Accordingly, before filing a complaint, trademark owners must carefully analyse the facts of their case and ensure that they back up their assertions with sufficient evidence. In this article, Finnegan attorneys  Douglas A. Rettew and  Jonathan Uffleman provide an overview of common issues that trademark holders should consider when preparing a UDRP complaint.

Previously published in World Trademark Review

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More