Testimonial Evidence In Patent Owner Preliminary Responses—It's Now Allowed, But When Is It Appropriate?

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
When the America Invents Act was first implemented, a patent owner was barred from including testimonial evidence in the optional patent owner preliminary response.
United States Intellectual Property

When the America Invents Act, creating the post-grant review process before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board, was first implemented, a patent owner was barred from including testimonial evidence in the optional patent owner preliminary response. However, the PTO recently implemented a set of new rules for AIA inter partes review (IPR) petitions, which took effect May 2, 2016. In this article,  Lionel M. Lavenue, R. Benjamin Cassady, and  Kara A. Specht will address how one of these newly implemented rules allows patent owners to provide more robust preliminary responses to petitions, which can now include testimonial evidence

Previously published in Bloomberg BNA

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More