United States: Ensuring Enforceability Of Online E-Commerce

Online terms of service, terms of use or "terms and conditions" ( collectively, "TOS") are ubiquitous-rarely do we see a website without some form of TOS, typically accessed through a link at the bottom of a site's home page. This runs the gamut from sites that are purely informational and passive, having no end-user interactions and posting no third party content, to those focusing on user-generated content ("UGC") and e-commerce, be it at the consumer or business-to-business level. But merely posting TOS on a site does not make them enforceable. To ensure enforceability, an end-user must either provide clear affirmative electronic assent to the TOS or have actual or constructive notice of conspicuously posted TOS before proceeding to interact with a site. Specific provisions of TOS, particularly waivers of material rights, must also pass muster under applicable state law.

In this context, online TOS are no different than any other form of contract, which, as we all learned in our first year of law school, requires both a clear offer and acceptance under applicable state law.1 As the Second Circuit has observed: "While new commerce on the Internet has exposed courts to many new situations, it has not fundamentally changed the principles of contract."2 In the context of the Internet, this "meeting of the minds" must occur digitally, such that courts can unequivocally conclude that a user had at least constructive, if not actual, notice of the TOS and an opportunity to review them before taking action on a website or in connection with an online purchase.3 Even if TOS are deemed "accepted" by end-users, they still can be challenged-and often are from the defense side-as contracts of adhesion or as being unconscionable, either in whole or as to specific terms, such as forum selection and liability limitation clauses.

For a purely passive informational site, TOS typically only need to provide basic disclosures, including notice of intellectual property rights, company contact details and site administration information. Enforceability is therefore not a major concern. But once a site becomes interactive in any way, those TOS sitting at the bottom of a web page are meaningless unless they are reasonably communicated to, and form a legally binding contract with, end-users.

Among the most critical provisions in TOS from the provider's perspective are those concerning choice of law, mandatory forum selection, arbitration and class action waivers, warranty disclaimers and limitations of liability. Where UGC, merchant or other third party content is posted on a site, additional key terms will include content license terms dictating what usage rights are ceded to the service provider in that content, and a requisite "takedown" policy and agent designation under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"), which is necessary for a non-publisher service provider to take advantage of the secondary liability "safe harbor" under the DMCA.4 From an online provider's perspective, the enforceability of these types of material terms is critical to controlling exposure to potentially substantial liabilities and the costs attendant to litigating multiple claims throughout the country in different legal jurisdictions.

"[M]erely posting TOS on a site does not make them enforceable. To ensure enforceability, an end-user must either provide clear affirmative electronic assent to the TOS or have actual or constructive notice of conspicuously posted TOS before proceeding to interact with a site."

Where such terms are material to a provider's business model, existing TOS and the applicable website interface should be reviewed carefully and revised as necessary to insure enforceability on an ongoing basis. TOS should also incorporate by reference, and hyperlink to, a website's applicable privacy policy, which then becomes part of the overall contract with an end-user.

Browsewrap vs. Clickwrap TOS

Online TOS generally fall into one of two categories: "browsewrap" or "clickwrap" agreements, although there are nuances within each category. "Browsewrap" refers to TOS that typically are posted on a site and do not require any affirmative assent by an end-user to use the site or its services.5 Browsewrap TOS often sit passively as a hyperlink at the bottom of a website home page, but may also be brought to a user's attention and accessed through one or more links on a site, without requiring an end-user to affirmatively accept or read them. Browsewrap TOS that are merely posted on a site with no conspicuous notice to end-users of their existence are not enforceable because there is no evidence that an end-user consented to the TOS or even had actual knowledge of them.6 Tell-tale signs of unenforceability include burying a TOS hyperlink in an inconspicuous location on a website so as not to provide reasonable notice of their existence to a user; making sure the TOS link itself is no more, and perhaps even less, prominent in terms of font size and color than other non-material links on a site; and a failure to direct users to the TOS when they are subscribing for services, opening an account or making a purchase.7

Modified browsewraps have, however, been enforced on a case by case basis. This has occurred where a user was expressly notified that his or her continued activity on the site was subject to specified TOS and a conspicuous link was provided to access those TOS one or two clicks away. In these instances, legally sufficient constructive notice of the TOS was deemed provided to the end-user. For example, in dismissing a class action complaint, the Eastern District of New York recently enforced arbitration and class action waiver clauses in Amazon.com's TOS, a hybrid browsewrap/clickwrap agreement, as characterized by the court.8 Amazon endusers were prominently notified at final checkout that by placing an order "you agree to Amazon's privacy notice and conditions of use." The words "conditions of use" were a colored hyperlink that took users to Amazon's TOS. To confirm a purchase, the user had to then click "Place your order," which was positioned just below the TOS notification. Although users were not required to specifically accept the TOS, the court held that the TOS notification and hyperlink were sufficiently conspicuous on the checkout page so as to notify an end-user each time a purchase was made that purchases were subject to the TOS and that this placed end-users at least on "inquiry" notice.

On the heels of its Amazon decision, however, Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the Eastern District of New York refused to enforce hybrid browsewrap TOS and an arbitration clause contained therein in a class action involving in-flight WiFi service fees, where an end-user was not required to click through to TOS which were posted eight pages down after a sign-in screen.9 The court assessed an average Internet user's "capacity and understanding" and concluded that average end-users would not have been informed that they were binding themselves to any TOS. As a result, forum selection and arbitration clauses in the TOS were not enforceable. As an evidentiary matter, the court placed the burden on the defendant to show "special circumstances indicating that the plaintiffs were aware, or should have been aware, of such clauses because of their special knowledge."

"Clickwrap" agreements, on the other hand, require users to affirmatively "accept" TOS as an express condition to initially engage with a website, whether to purchase or sell goods online, post videos, subscribe to video-on-demand services or download games. Clickwraps are generally enforced because end-users must affirmatively accept the TOS that are conspicuously posted on or linked to directly from the same page as the acceptance mechanism (such an "I accept" icon), even if they chose not to read the TOS.10 In some cases, the site will require an end-user to scroll through the TOS before acknowledging acceptance (sometimes referred to as a "scrollwrap" agreement), a procedure that ensures enforceability.11 The more direct the end-user's interaction is with the TOS and the acceptance procedure, the most secure the website owner will be in enforcing its TOS.

Formation of a Valid TOS Agreement

The starting point is whether a valid and enforceable online contract is formed. As the Second Circuit made clear in an early case addressing online contracts: "Mutual manifestation of assent, whether by written or spoken word or by conduct, is the touchstone of contract."12 This manifestation of assent can be direct in the form of TOS that are clearly presented to an end-user for prior review and must be affirmatively "accepted," as in a traditional clickwrap agreement scenario. Here, state courts and federal courts applying state contract law are nearly unanimous in upholding such direct acceptance as creating a binding agreement.

New York courts have regularly upheld the validity of such clickwrap agreements. As an example, in a 2008 criminal proceeding involving alleged online deceptive advertising, the New York Supreme Court held that the TOS posted on the website of Direct Revenue, LLC, constituted a binding agreement and all end-users were bound by express disclosures in the TOS respecting the use of pop-up ads and other practices, as well as limitations on liability. This all precluded any claims of misrepresentation and deceptive business practices and required dismissal of fraud claims.13 All website users were required to click a "Yes" button within a dialog box to confirm their assent to the TOS, which they had the opportunity to read. As the court emphasized, "jujnder New York law, such contracts are enforced so long as the consumer is given a sufficient opportunity to read the EULA [end-user license agreement], and assents thereto after being provided with an unambiguous method of accepting or declining the offer..."14

Assent also can be established where a site provides prominent notice that use is subject to the posted TOS, which are accessible through one or two clearly identifiable links, and the user then must click a link acknowledging this disclosure without being compelled to read the TOS themselves. A recent example is 5381 Partners v. Sharesale.com, involving an online merchant agreement that was enforced where there was clear and uncontroverted evidence that the user could not have become a merchant and used the site without first affirmatively agreeing to the applicable merchant terms by clicking a box confirming agreement with the TOS, even if such terms were not actually read.15

On the other hand, the absence of a means for a user to affirmatively accept posted TOS will preclude the formation of an enforceable online contract, unless there is unequivocal evidence that a user had actual or constructive knowledge of a website's TOS. In defending a consumer complaint tied to an online purchase, for example, Barnes & Noble recently lost a bid to enforce an arbitration clause in its browsewrap agreement TOS, which were accessible through links at the bottom of its website pages, because its site "did not provide reasonable notice of its Terms of Use" and consumers were not prompted to assent thereto.16 In that case, the Ninth Circuit, applying both New York and California law, emphasized that even in the absence of affirmative consent, such as through an "I accept" button, the TOS would likely have been enforceable if the user had actual notice of the agreement. In the absence of actual knowledge, the enforceability of browsewrap TOS depends "on whether the website puts a reasonably prudent user on inquiry notice of the terms of the contract"—and this, in turn, "depends on the design and content of the website and the agreement's webpage."17

Similarly, the New Jersey Appellate Division refused to enforce a forum selection clause in TOS where the "clause was unreasonably masked from the view of the prospective purchaser because of its circuitous mode of presentation" and was not visible on the purchaser's computer without scrolling down to a submerged portion of a webpage where a disclaimer containing the clause appeared.18 In that case, there also was no requirement before concluding a purchase that the plaintiff had to affirmatively accept the posted terms, putting a final nail in the TOS coffin.

One observation gleaned from the case law is that courts scrutinize browsewrap-type TOS more closely in matters involving consumers, rather than those concern- ; ing more sophisticated merchants and other businesses. This was recently emphasized by Senior Judge Weinstein in Berkson v. GoGo LLC, who wrote: "Because of the passive nature of acceptance in browsewrap agreements, courts closely examine the factual circumstances surrounding a consumer's use."19 There, Judge Weinstein refused to enforce TOS against consumers where the "design and content of the website, including the homepage, did not make the 'terms of use' readily and obviously available.... The hyperlink to the 'terms of use' was not in large font, all caps, or in bold.. .Nor was it accessible from multiple locations on the webpage. "20

To read this article in full, please click here.

Footnotes

1. See, e.g., Express Indus, and Term. Corp. v. New York State Dept, of Transp., 93 N.Y.2d 584,589,715 N.E.2d 1050,1053 (1999) ("To create a binding contract, there must be a manifestation of mutual assent sufficiently definite to assure that the parties are truly in agreement with respect to all material terms.").

2. Register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc., 356 F.3d 393,403 (2d Cir. 2004). As this court also emphasized: "To form a valid contract under New York law, there must be an offer, acceptance, consideration, mutual assent and intent to be bound." Id. at 427 (internal quotations omitted).

3. . See Starke v. Gilt Groupe, Inc., 2014 WL1652225 (S.D.N.Y. April 24, 2014), where the court upheld Gilt Groupe's membership sign-up process, which included a sign-up box with a hyperlink to TOS through a single "click," where a user was prominently notified . that membership was governed by the posted TOS. Plaintiff was deemed to have constructive notice of the TOS and was bound thereby because he was aware the TOS existed and governed his purchases, despite not actually having viewed or read the TOS.

4. 17 U.S.C. § 512. The DMCA, which applies only to copyright claims, absolves an online service provider from secondary infringement liability if the provider fully complies with the statutory conditions, which include posting and abiding by a notice and "take-down" process, and listing and recording with the Copyright Office an agent to receive DMCA claims. Section 512 also permits users who posted challenged content to contest wrongful takedowns. A broader discussion of the DMCA is beyond the scope of this article.

5. See, e.g., Hines v. Overstock.com, Inc., 668 F.Supp.2d 362,366-67 (E.D.N.Y.2009) ("Unlike a clickwrap agreement, a browsewrap agreement does not require the user to manifest assent to the terms and conditions expressly... [a] party instead gives his assent simply by using the website."). Hines held that an online retailer's TOS were not enforceable because users were not prompted to review them and the TOS were not prominently displayed.

6. See, e.g., In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 893 F.Supp.2d 1058 (D. Nev. 2012) (browsewrap agreement was unenforceable where users were not required to take affirmative action to assent to the terms and there was no evidence that users consented to such terms or were even aware of the terms.).

7. Id. at 1064.

8. Nicosia v. Amazon, 84 F.Supp.3d 142 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 4,2015) (Second Circuit appeal pending as of the writing of this article). Note the Supreme Court held in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 321 (2011) that class-action waiver and mandatory arbitration clauses were enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, which preempted California law that might otherwise find such clauses unconscionable in consumer contracts under the test set forth in Discover Bank v. Superior Ct., 36 Cal.4th 148,30 Cal.Rptr.3d 76 (2005). Accord American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, 133 S.Ct. 2304 (2013) (FAA does not permit courts to invalidate a contractual waiver of class arbitration on the ground that the plaintiff's cost of individually arbitrating a federal statutory claim exceeds the potential recovery).

9. Berk son v. Gogo LLC, 97 F. Supp. 3d 359 (E.D.N.Y. April 8,2015) (Second Circuit appeal pending as of the writing of this article; motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement granted at 2015 WL 7960042 (Dec. 4,2015)).

10. See, e.g., Whitt v. Prosper Funding LLC, 2015 WL 4254062 (S.D.N.Y. July 14,2015) (a reasonably prudent website user does not lack sufficient notice of terms of an agreement that are viewable through a conspicuous hyperlink adjacent to a clickable box indicating acceptance of the TOS); Centrifugal Force, Inc. v. Softnet Commc'n, Inc., 2011 WL 744732, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1,2011) ("In New York, clickwrap agreements are valid and enforceable contracts."); Rudgayzer v. Google Inc., 2013 WL 6057988 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 15,2013) (upholding Google's clickwrap agreement that required a "user's assent as a prerequisite for using the services," finding the terms were "reasonably communicated."); Feldman v. Google, Inc., 513 F. Supp. 2d 229,233 (E.D. Pa. 2007) (forum selection clause enforced in TOS between Internet advertising service and advertiser where TOS conspicuously notified users in bold at the top to "Carefully read the following terms and conditions," required users to click on an "accept" box and the TOS were presented in a scrollable window).

11. See Berkson, supra, 97 F. Supp. 3d at 395 -97 (also discussing at length variations of click-wrap and browsewrap agreements and degrees of enforceability).

12. Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17,32 (2d. Cir. 2002) ("where consumers are urged to download free software at the immediate click of a button, a reference to the existence of license terms on a submerged screen is not sufficient to place consumers on inquiry or constructive notice of those terms."). The Second Circuit applied California law to refuse enforceability of an arbitration clause in TOS that were buried at the bottom of a download web page.

13. People v. Direct Revenue, LLC, 2008 NY Slip Op. 50845 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. Co., 3/12/2008).

14. Id. '

15. 5381 Partners v. Sharesale.com, 2013 WL 5328324 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 23,2013). Although the end user argued that the merchant terms were not "readily visible" because one had to click a link to access those terms, the court found the agreement enforceable because the plaintiff "was shown precisely where to access the Merchant Agreement before it agreed to them, and it should have clicked on them." See also Rudgayzer, supra.

16. Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 763 F.3d 1171 (9th Cir. 2014). The TOS also provided for application of New York law, and the Ninth Circuit noted that its decision comported with both New York and California law. 763 F.3d at 1175.

17. Id. at 1177 (also citing to Specht, 306 F.3d at 30-31).

18. Hoffman v. Supplements Togo Mgmt., LLC, 419 N.J. Super. 596,611 (App. Div. 2011). See also Edme v. Internet Brands, Inc., 968 F. Supp. 2d 519,525-26 (E.D.N.Y. 2013) (court refused to enforce forum selection clause in TOS under New York law because no evidence was presented to show how an end user was presented with the TOS on a website).

19. Berkson, supra, 97 F. Supp. 3d at 395.

20. Id. at 404.

Originally published in Vol. 34, No. 1 of the spring/summer 2016 issue of Inside, a publication of the Corporate Counsel Section of the NYS Bar Association.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.