ARTICLE
20 June 2016

FINRA Sanctions Firm For Supervisory Failures With "Non-Traditional" ETFs

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
FINRA stated that the firm had instituted policies concerning sales practice obligations for exchange-traded funds ("ETFs"), but had failed to enforce these policies reasonably.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

FINRA sanctioned a broker-dealer for (i) selling leveraged, inverse and inverse-leveraged exchange-traded funds ("non-traditional ETFs") to retail customers that did not meet the firm's stated suitability criteria, and (ii) recommending non-traditional ETFs that were unsuitable.

FINRA stated that the firm had instituted policies concerning sales practice obligations for exchange-traded funds ("ETFs"), but had failed to enforce these policies reasonably. Additionally, FINRA found that the firm failed to establish an adequate supervisory system for monitoring the holding periods of non-traditional ETFs, and also failed to conduct adequate diligence with respect to the risks and features of the non-traditional ETFs relative to the tolerance of retail customers to whom they were recommended.

FINRA found that the firm violated NASD Rules 2310 and 3010, and FINRA Rules 2010 and 2111.  FINRA fined the firm $2.25 million and ordered it to pay restitution of more than $716,000 to affected customers.

Commentary

When firms fail to live up to their own compliance procedures, their ensuing discussions with regulators are often not about guilt or innocence; they are about monetary penalties. Each business should review its self-imposed compliance obligations periodically and be confident that they are satisfied.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More