United States: Citibank v. Norske: Enjoining Violations Of Indentures? — Not So Fast

A recent case out of the Southern District of New York, Citibank, NA, London Branch v. Norske Skogindustrier ASA (S.D.N.Y. March 8, 2016), once again illustrates the difficulty of obtaining injunctive relief against prospective indenture violations of a financially troubled issuer.

The Facts

Norske was a Norwegian-headquartered paper company with global operations and paper mills in several countries. The company had two issues of near-term maturing debt, €121,421,000 principal amount of 11.75% notes due 2016 and €218,106,000 principal amount of 7% of senior notes due 2017. Norske was experiencing liquidity issues, and in February 2015, to shore up its finances, the company issued €290,000,000 principal amount of 11.75% senior secured notes due 2019. The 2016 and 2017 notes were unsecured. The 2019 notes were guaranteed by various subsidiaries of the company and secured by the stock of the subsidiary guarantors and assets located in Australia and Tasmania, but not Norske's assets located in Europe or certain European bank accounts.

Despite the added liquidity from the 2019 notes, Norske's financial situation continued to deteriorate, and by the end of 2015, it faced default on upcoming principal and interest payments due on the 2016 and 2017 notes. After fits and starts, in December 2015, Norske entered into an agreement with principal holders of the 2016 and 2017 notes whereby the company would offer to exchange those notes for a package of securities consisting of exchange notes, unsecured notes, perpetual notes and equity subscription rights. Importantly, the exchange notes were to be secured by the unencumbered assets of the subsidiary guarantors, including European paper mills and bank accounts.

With the exchange offer initially set to close in February 2016, Citibank, acting through its London branch in its capacity as indenture trustee for the 2019 notes, brought an action in New York State Supreme Court to enjoin the exchange offer as being in violation of the indenture for the 2019 notes. The New York state court issued a temporary restraining order, after which the case was removed to federal court in the Southern District of New York. Following briefing and a hearing, the district court denied the request for an injunction. As is conventional, the court considered whether the plaintiff was likely to succeed on the merits and whether the plaintiff would suffer irreparable injury absent an injunction. While the court indeed found that the exchange offer, upon consummation, would violate the 2019 notes indenture, it declined to issue an injunction because of the failure to satisfy irreparable harm.

The Arguments and the Court's Analysis

Citibank's claim that the exchange offer violated the 2019 notes indenture rested on the interpretation of competing provisions of the indenture's indebtedness covenant. On the one hand, the covenant included a refinancing basket, but expressly excluded from that basket a refinancing of the 2016 and 2017 notes. On the other hand, the covenant contained a basket for qualified securitization financing (QSF), defined as "any financing" pursuant to which the issuer or any guarantor transfers or grants a security interest in specified assets. Norske had maintained that it was permissible to issue the exchange notes under the QSF basket even though the issuance of the exchange notes as a refinancing would be prohibited under the refinancing basket. The indenture for the 2019 notes, it was noted, expressly allowed the issuer to select among available baskets for the purpose of permitted issuances. Citibank challenged this analysis. It argued that the QSF basket was available only for financings, i.e., new money debt raises, and not a "refinancing" such as the exchange offer. The court sided with the plaintiff and adopted the textual distinction between a "financing" and a "refinancing." Likelihood of success on the merits was therefore established.

Next, Citibank argued that if the exchange offer were not enjoined, it would suffer irreparable harm. According to Citibank, the exchange offer was unlikely to permanently repair Norske's perilous finances and a bankruptcy filing was likely to occur. Absent the exchange offer, the assets that would secure the exchange notes would be unencumbered and therefore available to other creditors, including the holders of the 2019 notes, for recovery in bankruptcy.

The court rejected Citibank's contentions on a number of grounds. First, the court said, Citibank had not demonstrated that a default on its own debt was imminent, and indeed there was testimony that should the exchange offer go forward, the company would continue to make payment on the 2019 notes. The court observed, moreover, that if the exchange offer were not allowed to proceed, the company would be in a worse financial position. Furthermore, the court accepted apparently uncontested testimony that the collateral currently securing the 2019 notes would be adequate to repay the notes in full in bankruptcy. Finally, the court rejected plaintiff's claim that the "insolvency exception" to the irreparable harm test should be applied. Under that exception, courts have held that in the face of an issuer's impending insolvency, irreparable harm will be deemed to exist. The court declined to apply the exception, because insolvency of the issuer was more likely to occur were the court to issue the requested injunction.

Finding no irreparable harm, the court rejected Citibank's request to scuttle the exchange offer. In denying the requested injunction, the court made a point of citing to Judge Faila's decision in Marblegate Asset Management v. Education Management Corp., 75 F. Supp. 3d 592 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). In that case, famous for finding a violation of Section 316(b) of the Trust Indenture Act, the court denied injunctive relief notwithstanding its determination that a pending restructuring would violate the TIA and the severely compromised financial condition of the issuer.

The Takeaway

The case offers a number of lessons. First, courts may be receptive to arguments based on fine textual nuances in interpreting complex indenture provisions and holding issuers to a literal reading of their debt documents. Second, as in Marblegate, courts may refuse to interfere with restructuring efforts that seek to avoid an imminent descent into insolvency, notwithstanding legal or contractual niceties that would be violated in the course of the restructuring. Each case, of course, turns on its facts, and other outcomes could be expected where harm to nonparticipating debt holders is more palpable. Nonetheless, the case provides a useful data point for judicial approaches to financially charged situations where competing interests of debtholders pull indenture interpretation in different directions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions