ARTICLE
31 May 2016

International Organization Of Securities Commissions Recommends The Development Of Guidelines To Combat Issues Arising From The Impact Of Storage And Delivery Infrastructure On Commodity Derivatives Market Pricing

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
OSCO published its final report on the impact of storage infrastructures on the integrity of the price formation process of physically-delivered commodity derivatives contracts traded on regulated exchanges.
United States Finance and Banking

On May 9, 2016, IOSCO published its final report on the impact of storage infrastructures on the integrity of the price formation process of physically-delivered commodity derivatives contracts traded on regulated exchanges. The report sets out findings and conclusions following research, an industry survey and a public roundtable. IOSCO concludes that the IOSCO Principles for the Regulation and Supervision of Commodity Derivatives Markets provide an adequate framework for implementing effective oversight, governance and operational controls of storage infrastructure. IOSCO does not recommend the creation of additional principles or revision of the existing principles. However, it does consider that it is necessary to develop good practice guidelines and enhance current accepted practices.

The report identifies several issues arising from storage infrastructure practices. First, there are issues related to the powers of financial regulators who have limited ability to detect emerging problems due to their limited scope of regulatory powers over warehouses. Different regulators are also often responsible for regulating different aspects of the market and storage, which may confuse market participants and possibly affect how quickly issues can be resolved. Regulatory uncertainty is also prevalent in cross-border scenarios where an exchange uses warehouses in a jurisdiction other than their home jurisdictions. Secondly, exchanges use different mechanisms to regulate physical delivery of commodities. IOSCO considers that terms setting out physical delivery requirements should be part of the contract specifications and not form part of the contracts between an exchange and a warehouse. This would give market participants greater certainty and give regulators more authority. Third, there is lack of transparency about the discounts and incentives offered by warehouses as well as warehouse operational parameters (e.g. stocks and queue length). The ability of exchanges and/or regulators to identify emerging issues is limited. Finally, conflicts of interest may arise where warehouse operators, derivative traders and exchange members belong to the same corporate parent.

IOSCO's report is available at: http://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD530.pdf  and the IOSCO Principles are available at: https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD358.pdf .

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More