United States: The Subpoena Power Of The NYC Department Of Consumer Affairs

Last Updated: May 23 2016
Article by Karen F. Lederer and Patrick M. Ryan

On May 3, 2016, the Madison Square Garden Company filed a petition in New York state court seeking to quash two subpoenas served by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. The subpoenas were issued in connection with the DCA's investigation into MSG's compliance with the City's paid sick leave law, and they demand that MSG produce the personal contact information of every one of the thousands of MSG employees covered by the law and documents showing the amount of paid sick time accrued and used by each employee. The subpoenas also request all 18 of MSG's collective bargaining agreements with its union employees so that the DCA can audit them to ensure that they either comply with the paid sick leave law or that the laws were expressly waived by the unions.

Expansive requests from the DCA are not unusual, but there are limits under the law.

The legal arguments in MSG's petition provide a useful compendium of factors that can invalidate a DCA subpoena. MSG argues that the subpoenas are overbroad, not reasonably related to any investigation, and seek irrelevant information and documents. Additionally, MSG argues that the subpoenas lack any factual basis that shows, with sufficient specificity, that the investigation is based on authentic underlying complaints. This requirement was discussed in Myerson v. Lentini Bros. Moving & Storage Co., 33 N.Y. 2d 250, 256 (1973), where the court stated that "[No] agency of government may conduct an unlimited and general inquisition into the affairs of persons within its jurisdiction solely on the prospect of possible violations of law being discovered" (internal citations omitted). See also New York Shredding Corp. v. New York City Dep't of Investigation, 184 Misc. 2d 174 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. 2000) (denying motion to quash where the DCA and DOI provided an adequate factual basis for the investigation to justify enforcement of the subpoena by the court). According to the court in Lentini, this requirement is not that the Commissioner must show probable cause for the investigation, but that "the basis for [the subpoena's] issuance be more than isolated or rare complaints by disgruntled customers." Id. at 258.

Before reviewing further examples of contests over DCA subpoenas, however, it is important to understand where the DCA gets the power to issue subpoenas. There are several sources. The first is New York City Charter, § 2203, which establishes the powers of the Commissioner of the DCA. That section gives the Commissioner many powers, including the power to "receive and evaluate complaints and initiate his own investigations relating to these matters and take appropriate action, including referral to a federal or state agency." § 2203(d). With respect to the full range of the Commissioner's powers, § 2203(f) states: "The commissioner, in performance of said functions, shall be authorized to . . . serve subpoenas . . ." The New York City Administrative Code grants subpoena power to the Commissioner in his or her role as head of a licensing body. Section 20-104(c) states: "The commissioner or the commissioner's designee shall be authorized . . . to issue subpoenas . . ." Finally, the Rules of the City of New York, at R.C.N.Y. § 6-36, state that in connection with DCA adjudicative hearings, "a subpoena may be issued [by the Commissioner] to compel the production of any paper, photograph, or other record relevant to the violations alleged for examination or introduction into evidence, or a subpoena to compel the appearance of persons to give testimony."

The seminal decision on the enforceability of DCA subpoenas is the Lentini case cited above. In that case the court held that a subpoena issued by the Commissioner requesting all of Lentini's books and records was overbroad and issued without a sufficient factual justification by the Commissioner. The legal analysis in Lentini is still relevant today. In a DCA subpoena case decided in 2015, Menin v. Webster Hand Car Wash Corp., 2015 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3900 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co., Oct. 27, 2015), the court held that after demonstrating the authority to issue a subpoena, a nonjudicial body must show: 1) that the subpoena is reasonably related to the matter under investigation; 2) that the documents subpoenaed are material and relevant to the matter being investigated; and 3) that there is a sufficient factual basis for the investigatory action to support enforcement. The subpoena in Webster was quashed because there were virtually no specific facts justifying the investigatory action, just a bare-bones and conclusory assertion that the documents sought were necessary for the investigation. The court also found that the subpoena was overbroad and called for items of questionable relevance.

Another recent case in which a DCA subpoena that was quashed is Abbott Laboratories v. Menin, Index No. 158164-2015 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co., 12/13/15). There, the subpoena issued to Abbott Labs requested documents relating to Abbott's incorporation, ownership, advertising practices, labeling practices, and customer lists, as well as to the responsibilities, qualifications, and training of its employees responsible for advertising its Similac brand baby formula. The focus of the investigation was the advertising claims being made for Similac, and the DCA initiated its investigation under its authority to enforce laws prohibiting deceptive trade practices and false advertising. The court quashed the subpoena, finding that it was unacceptably overbroad and that the documents requested would require enormous time and resources on the part of Abbott to produce.

In order to challenge a subpoena on any of the above grounds, however, a party must have standing. Where the would-be challenger does not have some proprietary interest in the documents being sought, the standing requirement is not met. See Echel Gasoline Corp. v. New York City Dep't of Consumer Affairs, 108 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. 2d Dep't 1985). Even being party to a contract that has been sought by the subpoena is not sufficient to confer standing to challenge it. 38-14 Realty Corp. v. New York City Dep't of Consumer Affairs, 103 A.D. 2d 804 (2d Dep't 1984).

In sum, New York City businesses may be subject to subpoenas from the DCA, but New York courts have granted challenges to these subpoenas where there is not a sufficient factual basis for the investigation, the subpoena is not reasonably related to the investigation, and the subpoena is not limited to documents that are material and relevant.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Karen F. Lederer
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions