United States: California Legislative Update - May 2016

Last Updated: May 19 2016
Article by Christopher E. Cobey

The California legislature has reached the midpoint of its 2016 legislative session.  The Governor has signed four bills of significance to California private sector employers. In addition, a few dozen workplace-related bills have moved beyond their initial policy committees, and many have passed their house of origin and proceeded to consideration in the other legislative chamber.  Major bills still in process would change private arbitration of employment disputes, and would create predictive scheduling requirements for some employees working on a shift basis. 

This report summarizes the new laws and key bills still in process, and identifies other bills that still could make it to the finish line this year. The Legislature is required to complete its work for this year's session no later than August 31, 2016.  After the Legislature enters its final recess, Governor Brown will have until September 30, 2016 to sign or veto bills passed by the Legislature at the end of the session.

New Laws

In an eight-day period last month, a bill on California's minimum wage went from stalled to signed. The state's minimum wage is headed to $15 an hour over six years, with the first step occurring on January 1, 2017.  A full description of the amended minimum wage law is available here.

Governor Jerry Brown also signed a bill expanding workplace prohibitions on smoking in the workplace.  The bill extends the prohibition on smoking in a place of employment to include an owner-operated business, and eliminates most of the specified exemptions that permit smoking in certain work environments, such as hotel lobbies, bars and taverns, banquet rooms, warehouse facilities, and employee break rooms. (ABX2-7; amends Labor Code section 6404.5.)  A companion bill signed by Brown increases the minimum age for smoking from 18 to 21, with some exceptions. (SBX2-7; amends various sections to the Business and Professions, and Penal, Codes.)

The last bill addresses the "safe harbor" period of time that certain companies are provided to correct construction-related accessibility violations under the Unruh Act .  The new and amended statutes establish a presumption that certain "technical violations" are presumed to not cause a person "difficulty, discomfort or embarrassment" for the purpose of an award of minimum statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim. The changes apply to small businesses (defined as employing 25 or fewer employees on average over the past three years, and having average annual gross receipts of less than $3,500,000 over the previous three years). The "safe harbor" is only applied where: (1) the claim is based on specific violations listed in the statutes; and (2) the small business corrects all of the technical violations included in the claim within 15 days of receiving written notice or the service of a summons and complaint regarding the accessibility claim, whichever is earlier.  The bill took effect on May 10, 2016, as an urgency measure. (SB 269; amends Civil Code sections 55.53 and 55.56, and Government Code sections 4459.7, 4459.8, and 8299.06; adds Government Code sections 65941.6 and 65946 et seq.)

Key Pending Bills

The following outlines the current status of key pending bills. The measure's latest committee or house location is noted in italics.

Fair Scheduling

SB 878 is part of the "fair scheduling" trend. This legislation would require restaurants, grocery, and retail store establishments to provide a 21-day work schedule listing all shifts for employees at least seven days prior to the first shift on that work schedule. If changes were made to the schedule with less than seven days' notice, an employer would have to pay modification pay to the affected employee(s). The bill would also authorize the Labor Commissioner  to order appropriate relief to aggrieved employees that could include reinstatement, backpay, the payment of modification pay withheld, and the payment of an additional sum up to $4,000 in the form of an administrative penalty. Aggrieved employees would also be allowed to bring a civil action against an employer for schedule shift change violations and be entitled to collect legal or equitable relief and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.  Senate Appropriations.

Three pending bills seek to limit arbitration as a dispute-resolution device in private employment.  The legislators sponsoring these bills have stated publicly that, in light of Governor Brown's veto last year of AB 465,1 they want to legislate incrementally to attack pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements as a dispute resolution tool in non-union California workplaces.

AB 2667 would require a waiver of a legal right, penalty, remedy, forum, or procedure for a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, including the right to file, notify, and pursue a civil action or complaint with the California Attorney General, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, or any other governmental entity, to be: (1) knowing and voluntary; (2) in writing; and (3) not made as a condition of entering into a contract for goods or services or as a condition of providing or receiving goods and services. This bill would also require a person who seeks to enforce the waiver to have the burden of proving that the waiver was knowing and voluntary and not made as a condition of the contract or of providing or receiving the goods or services. This bill would apply to any agreement to waive a legal right, penalty, remedy, forum, or procedure for a violation of the act, including an agreement to accept private arbitration, made, modified, or renewed on or after January 1, 2017. Assembly Floor.

AB 2879's key provision would prohibit pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreements, which was the substance of AB 465, vetoed by the Governor last fall.  The bill would amend Section 394 of the Military and Veterans Code to prohibit a person from requiring a waiver of the protections afforded members of the military forces because of his or her membership or service as a condition of employment, including the right to file and pursue a civil action or complaint. The bill would prohibit a person from retaliating against a person who refuses to waive these protections. The bill would require any waiver to be knowing and voluntary, in writing, and expressly not made as a condition of employment. The bill would require a person seeking to enforce such a waiver to have the burden of proving that the waiver was knowing and voluntary, and not made as a condition of employment. The bill would apply its provisions to any agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2017, including an agreement that requires private arbitration.  Assembly Floor.

SB 1241 would provide, for contracts entered into, modified, or extended on or after January 1, 2017, that a provision in a consumer contract that purports to designate the venue in which a controversy arising from the consumer contract is litigated, or the choice of law to be applied, is voidable by the consumer, with respect to a controversy arising in California, if the provision would deprive the consumer of the protection of California law or require the consumer to litigate the controversy out of state. The bill would also prohibit a seller from requiring a consumer to agree to these voidable provisions as a condition of entering into a contract regulated by the act, and would provide that such provisions, if required, are inoperative and California law applies in its place. Injunctive relief would be available in this context, and a court may award a plaintiff reasonable attorneys' fees. The legislation would include arbitration with litigation for purposes of these provisions, and would create an analogous set of rights, prohibitions, and requirements in connection with employment contracts.  Passed Senate; pending assignment in Assembly.

Salary History

AB 1676 would prohibit an employer, including state and local government employers, from seeking salary history information about an applicant for employment, and would require an employer (not including state and local government employers), upon reasonable request, to provide the pay scale for a position to an applicant. Assembly Appropriations.

Janitorial Industry

AB 1978 expands certain employer requirements to those in the janitorial industry. The provisions of the bill would apply to an estimated 220,000 California employees in the janitorial industry. The measure expands existing employee protections concerning workplace sexual violence and sexual harassment; requires all covered workers and supervisors to, at least annually, receive comprehensive, accurate and appropriate in-person training lasting at least four hours regarding sexual harassment and sexual assault that provides an opportunity for interactive questions and answers. The bill also establishes minimum qualification standards for trainers who may deliver such training, including but not limited to, a minimum of five years of experience conducting adult education with the demographics of the janitorial workforce (the collective bargaining agent that represents the employer's covered workers or the designee of the collective bargaining agent may deliver such trainings). In addition, the bill requires that, on and after January 1, 2018, no employer may conduct any janitorial business without a valid registration and all employers must be registered with state Department of Industrial Relations and  requires the online posting of janitorial contractor registry and database.  The bill is sponsored by SEIU California. Assembly Appropriations.

Equal Pay

SB 1063 would expand the state's equal pay statute, prohibiting discrimination in compensation based on sex, to also prohibit an employer from paying any of its employees at wage rates less than the rates paid to employees of another race or ethnicity for substantially similar work.  Senate Appropriations Suspense File.

Other Pending Bills

While the previously mentioned bills are likely of the most interest to employers, there are other pending bills that would also affect some private sector employers.

Apprenticeship

AB 1926.  If a contractor requests the dispatch of an apprentice to perform work on a public works project, this law would require that the apprentice be paid the prevailing rate for the time spent on a required activity.  Assembly Floor.

AB 2288 would require pre-apprenticeship programs in the building and construction trades to include a plan for outreach, recruitment, and retention of women and require the use of the Multi-Craft Core Curriculum developed for the purpose of preparing students and pre-apprenticeship participants for labor-management apprenticeship programs.  The bill is sponsored by the State Building and Construction Trades Council of California. Assembly Floor.

Agricultural Industry

AB 2574 would require, by July 1, 2017, a collaboration of state departments, including, but not limited to, the Department of Food and Agriculture, the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, to develop a New Veteran Farmer and Rancher Outreach and Assistance Plan to disseminate information to veterans in California about, among other things, federal and state veteran agricultural education, training, and other assistance programs. Senate Agriculture Committee.

AB 2757 would remove the exemption for agricultural employees regarding hours, meal breaks, and other working conditions, including specified wage requirements, and would create a schedule that would phase in overtime requirements for agricultural workers, over the course of four years, from 2017 to 2020. Beginning January 1, 2020, the law would require that a person employed in an agricultural occupation for more than 12 hours in one day to be compensated at the rate of no less than twice the employee's regular rate of pay, and would require the Department of Industrial Relations to update a specified wage order for consistency with these provisions. Assembly Appropriations Suspense File.

SB 702 would extend a Lake County-specific exemption of child labor law that allows minors to work during the peak agricultural season when school is not in session. Assembly Labor and Employment Committee.

Arbitration

SB 1007 would provide that a party to an arbitration has the right to have a certified shorthand reporter transcribe any deposition, proceeding, or hearing as the official record. The party requesting the transcript would be required to request the report upon the initiation of the arbitration or at the time that any deposition, proceeding, or hearing is being calendared and would also be required to incur the expense of the reporter, except as specified in a consumer arbitration. A party whose request has been refused by the arbitrator would be allowed to petition the court for an order to compel the arbitrator to grant the party's request. Senate Floor.

SB 1078 would prohibit an arbitrator from entertaining or accepting, from the time of appointment until the conclusion of the arbitration, any offers of employment as a dispute resolution neutral in another case involving a party or lawyer for a party in the pending arbitration without the prior written consent of the parties. The measure authorizes a party to recover costs incurred in an arbitration proceeding from a private arbitration company if the arbitration award is vacated or the arbitrator is dismissed during the pendency of the arbitration because of a violation of the specified ethical standards or disclosure requirements, and adds specified prohibitions and disclosure requirements relating to solicitations made by, or at the direction of, a private arbitration company to a party or a lawyer for a party in a pending arbitration. Senate Floor.

SB 1065 would provide that if a party has filed a claim pursuant to the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act and has been granted a preference, no appeal may be taken by an opposing party from an order dismissing or denying a petition to compel arbitration. Assembly Judiciary Committee.

Background Checks

AB 1843 would prohibit an employer from asking an applicant for employment to disclose, or from utilizing as a factor in determining any condition of employment, information concerning specific juvenile court actions or custodial detentions.  Senate Labor and Industrial Relations Committee.

Collective Bargaining Agreements

SB 954 requires per diem wages to include industry advancement and collective bargaining agreements' administrative fees, provided the employer is required by a collective bargaining agreement to make those payments. The bill would exclude from per diem wages employer payments related to certain apprenticeship or training programs, worker protection and assistance programs or committees established under the federal Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978, and industry advancement and collective bargaining agreements' administrative fees. Finally, the measure would prohibit credit for payments for industry advancement if those payments are not required by a collective bargaining agreement. Assembly Labor and Employment Committee.

Commuter Benefits

SB 1128 would remove the sunset provision from a program requiring certain employers in the San Francisco Bay Area to offer alternative-commute benefits to their employees. Assembly Transportation Committee.

Domestic Worker Bill of Rights

SB 1015 would delete the January 1, 2017 repeal date of the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights. Assembly Labor and Employment Committee.

Equal Pay

AB 1890 would enact the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act of 2016. This law would require an employer that has 100 or more employees in the state and a contract with the state of 30 days or more to submit a description of its nondiscrimination program to the department and to submit periodic reports, no more than annually, on a schedule to be determined by the department, of its compliance with that program. The bill would authorize the department to require approval and certification of the program, and require the nondiscrimination program to include policies and procedures designed to ensure equal employment opportunities for all applicants and employees, an analysis of employment selection procedures, and a workforce analysis. Assembly Appropriations Suspense File.

Health & Safety

SB 1167 would require the Division of Occupational Safety and Health, by July 1, 2017, to propose a heat illness and injury prevention standard applicable to indoor workers that provides equal or greater protection than existing outdoor heat regulations. Senate Appropriations Suspense File.

Human Trafficking

AB 1595 would require a private or public employer that provides mass transportation services in the state to train its employees, who are likely to interact or come into contact with victims of human trafficking, in recognizing the signs of human trafficking and how to report those signs to the appropriate law enforcement agency. The bill would require the Department of Justice to develop guidelines for the training, including, but not limited to, guidance on how to report human trafficking. By January 1, 2018, the training must be incorporated into the initial training process for all new employees. All existing employees would also need to receive this training. Assembly Appropriations Suspense File.

AB 1942 would require hotel and motel employees who are likely to come into contact with victims of human trafficking to be trained on how to recognize the signs of human trafficking and how to report those signs to an appropriate law enforcement agency.  Assembly Appropriations.

AB 2532 would repeal the verification requirement of an individual's legal status or authorization to work prior to providing employment services by state or local government agencies or any private organization contracting with the those agencies that provide employment services, and would repeal the specified workplace posting requirement for employment services being provided by the agencies. Assembly Floor.

SB 1001 would prohibit an employer or any other person or entity from discriminating against or engaging in unfair immigration-related practices against an applicant or employee or from reinvestigating or re-verifying an incumbent employee's authorization to work unless required to do so by federal law. Senate Appropriations.

AB 2261 would authorize the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement to, with or without receiving a complaint from an employee, commence an investigation, issue a citation, or bring an action against an employer who discharges or otherwise discriminates against an individual in violation of any law under the jurisdiction of the Labor Commissioner. Assembly Appropriations.

SB 1342 would allow localities to confer on officials or department heads the authority to issue subpoenas to enforce local wage laws. Assembly Judiciary Committee.

SB 1442 would require the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) (instead of the Secretary of the Health and Human Services Agency) to investigate and enforce the laws prohibiting discrimination in the conduct, operation, or administration of state or state-funded programs or activities on the basis of race, national origin, ethnic group identification, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, color, genetic information, or disability, and to issue rules and regulations. Senate Appropriations Committee.

Labor Commissioner Rulings

AB 2899 would require a person seeking a writ of mandate contesting the Labor Commissioner's ruling on an employer's non-payment of a minimum wage to post a bond with the Labor Commissioner, in an amount equal to the unpaid wages assessed under the citation, excluding penalties. The bill would require that the bond be issued in favor of the unpaid employees and ensure that the person seeking the writ makes prescribed payments pursuant to the proceedings.  The proceeds of the bond, sufficient to cover the amount owed, would be forfeited to the employee if the employer fails to pay the amounts owed within 10 days from the conclusion of the proceedings.  Assembly Appropriations.

Licensing

AB 2539 would require a person operating a modeling agency to be licensed by the Labor Commissioner under the licensing provisions that apply to talent agencies. Moreover, the bill would: (1) require a model to be classified as an employee of the person for whom the model's services are directly provided; (2) require the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to, no later than December 1, 2017, and in consultation with accredited specialists in the prevention and treatment of eating disorders, adopt an occupational safety and health standard for models; and (3) exempt a person covered by certain wage orders by the Industrial Welfare Commission from these provisions. Assembly Appropriations Suspense File.

SB 1125 would require license applications for establishments offering or proposing to offer nail care services to include a signed acknowledgment that the applicant understands it is responsible for compliance with any applicable state labor laws.  Senate Floor.

AB 2337 would require employers to inform each employee of his or her rights as a possible victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking by providing that information in writing to new employees upon hire and to other employees upon request. The bill would also require the Labor Commissioner to develop a form that employers could use to comply with these provisions and to post it on the commissioner's website. Assembly Floor.

AB 2437 would require the Labor Commissioner, by June 1, 2017, to develop a model notice pertaining to workplace rights and wage and hour laws for employees of establishments licensed under the Board of Barbering and Cosmetology.  Assembly Appropriations.

AB 2895 would provide for employee access to written injury and illness prevention programs (IIPPs) and remedies to an employee for an employer's failure reasonably to provide a copy on request of an employee.  Assembly Appropriations.

AB 2897 would require a car wash employer to provide written notice to a successor employer regarding the requirements of existing law prior to the sale or other transfer of the business. Assembly Labor and Employment Committee.

AB 2898 would extend some existing time periods in the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) by requiring the agency, when it does not intend to investigate an alleged violation, to notify the employee and the employer within 45 days, and by authorizing the aggrieved employee to commence a civil action 48 days after having sent notice of the alleged violation. The measure would require the agency to send notification within 48 days if it intends to investigate an alleged violation, and would authorize an aggrieved employee to commence a civil action after 173 days if, after having received notice of the agency's intent to investigate, no citation is issued or no further notification is received from the agency.  Assembly Appropriations.

AB 2068 requires talent services that post information about artists under contract via specified online and mobile platforms to remove photographs and other artist information from those locations upon an artist's request within 10 days. Assembly Floor.

Protected Time Off

AB 2405 would require an employers of 25 or more employees to annually provide an employee at least 24 hours of paid time off for the purposes of a planned absence for taking off up to 40 otherwise unpaid hours each year to find, enroll, or reenroll their child in a school, to participate in school activities, or address emergency situations at school. The bill would authorize an employee to use vacation or paid time off, or use unpaid time off, if available, when taking time off under these provisions. The measure would also provide a remedy to an employee whose request for time off under these provisions is denied by the employer, and require the Labor Commissioner to create a poster listing the protections available to employees and require an employer to post it at the workplace.  Assembly Appropriations Suspense File.

SB 1166 would create the "New Parent Leave Act," which would make it an unlawful employment practice for an employer who directly employs 10 or more persons to perform services for a wage or salary (compared to the federal Family and Medical Leave Act's definition of employer as an entity employing 50 or more employees) to refuse to allow an employee with more than 12 months of service with the employer, and who has at least 1,250 hours of service with the employer during the previous 12-month period, to take up to 12 weeks of parental leave to bond with a new child within one year of the child's birth, adoption, or foster care placement. This bill would also prohibit an employer from refusing to maintain and pay for coverage under a group health plan for an employee who takes this leave. Senate Appropriations.

Security Guards

AB 1311 would make the weekly pay requirement applicable to a security guard employed by a private patrol operator who is a temporary services employee.  The bill has received no votes in opposition so far. Senate Labor and Industrial Relations Committee.

Service Contractors

AB 1669.  Existing law already establishes a 10% bidding preference for public transit service contractors and subcontractors who agree to retain employees of the previous contractor for a period of at least 90 days. This bill would extend those requirements to contractors and subcontractors who submit bids for contracts for the collection and transportation of solid waste. The bill is sponsored by the California Teamsters Public Affairs Council. Assembly Floor.

Wage Statements

AB 2535 would provide that itemized wage statements required under current law do not need to show total hours worked for specified exempt employees for whom employers are not required to track hours. Assembly Appropriations.

Stalled Bills

Some California bills lost steam in recent weeks. Those bills that have been sidetracked, at least for the moment, include:

  • AB 1727, which would have, among other actions, established for eligible groups of independent contractors the right to organize and negotiate with hosting platforms. Disputes arising from this activity would have been deemed a "labor dispute" for the purpose of obtaining injunctive relief.  Surprisingly, after passing the Assembly, this "gig economy" bill allowing worker organizing stalled in the Assembly Judiciary Committee at the April 22nd deadline for consideration, with the author indicating the issue needed more study.
  • AB 1948 would have amended the penalties for meal or rest period violations. Failed Passage in Assembly Labor and Employment Committee.

What's Next?

Of all pending legislation, the "key" bills identified above will be the ones to watch most closely. As for the November elections, California will once again play no critical role in selecting the presidential nominees with its June 7th primary, and there will be only one statewide proposition (Proposition 50, concerning suspension of members of the Legislature without pay) on the ballot for that election. 

The general election ballot in November will be finalized this summer, however, and it promises to have several ballot propositions on it, as well as the selection of California's new U.S. Senator, 53 members of the House of Representatives, and 20 state senators and 80 assemblypersons.

Footnotes

1. See Christopher E. Cobey and Marina C. Gruber, A Legislative El Niño for California?: New 2016 Employment Laws for the State's Private Sector Employers, Littler Insight (Oct. 12, 2015), p. 5.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Christopher E. Cobey
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions