United States: Claim Construction Standard And Appellate Review Authority In Post-Grant Proceedings

On January 15, 2016, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. Lee to address two important questions relating to inter partes review proceedings:

Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in IPR proceedings, the Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation ("BRI") rather than their plain and ordinary meaning.

Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board's decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding is judicially unreviewable.1

The dispute arose out of a petition for inter partes review ("IPR") filed by Garmin International, Inc. ("Garmin"), of claims 10, 14, and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,778,074 owned by Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC ("Cuozzo"). 2 The Board denied all grounds on which the challenge to claims 10 and 14 were based, but nevertheless applied to those claims combinations of prior art that Garmin had only cited with respect to claim 17. The Board then instituted IPR for all three claims. The Board subsequently held all three claims to be unpatentable on the same grounds for which it had instituted IPR, and in doing so, applied the BRI, rather than the ordinary meaning, of a key claim term. 3 Garmin and Cuozzo settled, but the PTO intervened to defend the Board's decision on appeal.

A split Federal Circuit panel held that the Board's decision to institute IPR was judicially unreviewable, even while acknowledging that the Board may have acted ultra vires.4 On the merits, the Board held that the Board had permissibly adopted the BRI standard for claim construction in IPR. 5 Judge Newman dissented with respect to both issues. Cuozzo filed a petition for rehearing, but it was denied by a vote of 6-5.

Before the Supreme Court, Cuozzo asserts that, while the PTO has long used the BRI standard, it was always in proceedings, such as initial examination, where applicants could amend their claims as part of an iterative exchange with the examiner. 6 According to Cuozzo, the "Board's use of the BRI protocol in IPR defeats Congress's aim of substituting administrative adjudication for district court adjudication, because it leads to 'different results' than the ordinary-meaning construction used by courts." 7 With respect to the reviewability of the Board's institution decision, Cuozzo argues that 35 U.S.C. 314(d)—which states that the Board's decision to institute IPR is "final and nonappealable"—only bars an appeal of the Board's institution decision when issued. 8

The PTO responds that IPRs permit claim amendments, and that Congress has always blessed the use of BRI in such situations, including post-grant proceedings like inter partes reexamination. The PTO further argues that the AIA vests the PTO with broad rule making authority, and that its adoption of BRI is entitled to judicial deference as a reasonable exercise of that authority. 9 On the jurisdictional issue, the PTO's brief relies principally on the plain language of Section 314(d), which does not on its face differentiate between interlocutory appeals and those following a final written decision.

Cuozzo's reply brief attacks the PTO's comparison of IPRs to other examination-like proceedings, where amendments can be made on multiple occasions in an iterative process, and where applicants have an opportunity to disclaim broad claim constructions adopted by an examiner. With respect to the jurisdiction question, Cuozzo asserts that the Federal Circuit's current interpretation allows the Board to violate the AIA's limits without any judicial oversight.

Numerous amici have lined up on both sides of this dispute. Of note, retired Federal Circuit Judge Paul Michel submitted a brief arguing that BRI is inappropriate in IPRs. The Federal Circuit Bar Association and Licensing Executive Society both took the same position, while the Intellectual Property Owners Association and American Intellectual Property Law Association each argued that the Supreme Court should reverse on both the BRI and jurisdictional issues. On the other side, a large group of "technology companies, manufacturers, trade associations of Internet, automotive, computer and communications companies, and retailers that use and sell high-tech products," submitted a brief supporting both of the Federal Circuit's rulings.

The effects of a reversal by the Supreme Court remain somewhat unclear. In practice, it is rare that the PTAB's rulings, or Federal Circuit decisions on appeal therefrom, turn on application of the "BRI" standard as opposed to the ordinary "Phillips" claim construction standard. Moreover, multiple bills proposed last year in Congress would eliminate the BRI standard in inter partes reviews. The jurisdictional issue—whether the Federal Circuit has jurisdiction to rule on at least ultra vires acts by the PTAB at the institution stage—may have larger consequences, with pros and cons to both patentees and petitioners. Currently, the Federal Circuit will not review institution decision issues such as the determination of the real party-in-interest and privity. If the jurisdictional question is reversed, that could benefit patentees, who could appeal following a final written decision that the PTAB lacked the authority to institute the proceeding in the first place. On the other hand, a reversal on the jurisdictional question could theoretically open the door for petitioners to appeal following a final written decision with the respect to the denial of some, but not all, grounds as redundant.

Either way, this case will mark an important step in the development of IPR jurisprudence.


1 Docket No. 15-446.

2  Petition for Inter Partes Review, No. IPR2012-00001, Paper No. 1 (Sept. 16, 2012).

3  Final Written Decision, IPR2012-00001, Paper No. 59 (Nov. 13, 2013).

4 In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, 793 F.3d 1268, 1273 (Fed. Cir. 2015).

5 Id. at 1278–79.

6 Brief for the Petitioner (Feb. 22, 2016).

7 Id. at 13.

8 Id. at 15.

9 Brief for the Respondent (Mar. 23, 2016). 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.