United States: IRS Issues Proposed Regulations That Would Recast Certain Debt Instruments As Equity

On April 4, 2016, the IRS and U.S. Treasury Department issued proposed Treasury Regulations designed to curb the ability of large multinational companies to reduce their U.S. taxable income by engaging in "earnings stripping" practices (the "Proposed Regulations").1 If finalized, these rules, promulgated under section 385 of the Internal Revenue Code, would significantly impede several tax-planning options available to large multinationals.

Notwithstanding the ominous implications, the Proposed Regulations are subject to three major limitations. First, they apply only to related-party debt—specifically, so-called "expanded group instruments," or "EGIs."2. Second, they will impact only large corporations.3 Third, as Proposed Regulations, the new rules do not yet have the force of law and generally will go into effect no earlier than the date on which ultimately finalized.4

One of the key features of the Proposed Regulations is the requirement that affected taxpayers contemporaneously document related-party debt. Under this rule, taxpayers would generally be required to document both the commercial terms of the lending and an analysis of the creditworthiness of the debtor within 30 days of the lending, as well as satisfy certain ongoing maintenance requirements. Another key feature includes rules that recharacterize debt instruments issued in certain related-party transactions as equity. The Proposed Regulations also provide that the IRS on exam (but not the taxpayers) may bifurcate a single financial instrument issued between related parties between a combination of debt and equity. This portion of the rules will therefore affect common financial transactions, including for instance, cash pooling and treasury management activities.

The Proposed Regulations cast an extremely wide net and, if finalized, would easily be among the most ambitious and aggressive tax provisions promulgated by the Treasury in recent memory. Given the high stakes, while many practitioners doubt the Proposed Regulations will survive the review and comment process, there can be no doubt that if the Proposed Regulations fail, they will not fail due to any lack of initiative or creativity on the part of Treasury.5

I. Earnings Stripping – Background

As mentioned, the goal of the Proposed Regulations is to prevent multinationals from saving U.S. tax by way of earnings stripping.

A. What is "earnings stripping?"

"Earnings stripping" is the process of reducing (or "stripping") the taxable income of a U.S. taxpayer through deductible payments. In a typical earnings stripping structure, a foreign entity in a low tax jurisdiction lends to an affiliated U.S. corporation, allowing for the U.S. debtor corporation to reduce its taxable income by paying deductible interest expense to its foreign creditor. Although the foreign creditor will presumably recognize taxable interest income in the foreign country, to the extent that the U.S. tax rate exceeds the foreign tax rate, the U.S. deduction will result in tax savings for the group as a whole.

Current rules under Section 163(j) of the Internal Revenue Code provide a limitation on this practice. When interest expense is paid from a U.S. person to a person who is not a U.S. taxpayer6 and the debt-to-equity ratio of the U.S. debtor exceeds 1.5 to 1, the amount of the U.S. debtor's deductible interest expense will be limited to 50% of the debtor's adjusted taxable income.7 However, because this limitation is based on income,8 if the U.S. debtor is an operating entity generating substantial earnings, a significant amount of interest expense may remain deductible and therefore allow for significant earnings stripping, notwithstanding the section 163(j) limitation.

B. Section 385

In addition to section 163(j), section 385 is a potential weapon at Treasury's disposal to combat earnings stripping. This is the mechanism adopted by the Proposed Regulations. Section 385 allows Treasury to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to determine whether an interest in a corporation is to be treated as stock or indebtedness (or as stock in part and indebtedness in part). Under such a rule, the Proposed Regulations would thereby be able to disregard the label explicitly assigned to a debt instrument by a taxpayer and treat the instrument instead as equity in whole or in part. There are currently no regulations in effect on earnings stripping under section 385,9 so debt versus equity determinations heretofore have been largely the product of case law and other informal IRS guidance.

The potential effect of characterizing debt as equity under the Proposed Regulations is illustrated below. For purposes of the example, assume that FP is an Irish corporation taxed at 12.5% on all corporate income and that U.S. Sub is its wholly-owned subsidiary corporation, which is subject to corporate tax of 35% on all income. In the example, U.S. Sub distributes a Note to FP as a dividend:

Prior to the Proposed Regulations, U.S. Sub would be able to deduct interest expense payments on the Note issued to FP, while FP takes into account interest income, which is taxed at the Irish corporate tax rate of 12.5%. The income that is effectively "shifted" by U.S. Sub to FP results in a savings of 22.5% (i.e., the 35% U.S. corporate rate minus the 12.5% Irish rate) to the FP-U.S. Sub group. Contrast this with the result after finalization of the Proposed Regulations, as depicted on the right side of the diagram. With the Note recast as equity, the payments from U.S. Sub to FP are recast as dividend distributions and are therefore not deductible to U.S. Sub. Accordingly, no earnings stripping or erosion of the U.S. tax base is possible, and all corresponding tax savings are denied to the expanded group.10

II. The Proposed Regulations (Prop. Reg. § 1.385-1 through Prop. Reg. § 1.385-4)

The Proposed Regulations are organized into four sections which provide (1) general provisions (including, for example, rules that under certain circumstances recharacterize only a portion of a debt instrument as equity),11 (2) contemporaneous documentation requirements,12 (3) special consolidated group rules,13 and, most importantly, rules which implement the recharacterization of debt as equity in the situations described in the following paragraph.14 The Proposed Regulations are effective for debt instruments issued on or after the date the Proposed Regulations are finalized, although the recharacterization rules described below are proposed to apply to debt instruments issued on or after April 4, 2016 (with such instruments continuing to be treated as indebtedness during an additional 90-day grace period after finalization).15

Because the United States has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world,16 there is an almost ever-present incentive in a multinational structure to saddle U.S. member entities with as much debt as possible, regardless of what other jurisdictions are involved. Given capital constraints, it is therefore common for a U.S. company (as depicted in the illustration above) to simply distribute a note to a foreign related party in order to jumpstart the earnings stripping process, even when the only purpose of such indebtedness is to create tax savings. The Proposed Regulations evidence Treasury's belief that this practice is abusive,17 and would use the authority granted by section 385 to recast purported indebtedness as equity in the following specific cases when:

  • Debt is "pushed down" into U.S. subsidiaries by causing U.S. subsidiaries to directly distribute a note to new foreign parent as a distribution with respect to their stock (e.g., a dividend);
  • Debt is pushed down into U.S. subsidiaries through a two-step process whereby a U.S. subsidiary borrows cash from a related company and then makes a distribution with respect to its stock (e.g., a dividend) to its foreign parent; and
  • A U.S. purchaser acquires stock of a related foreign company using debt, creating the same effect as if it had distributed a note as a dividend distribution.

To summarize, where large taxpayers have issued related-party debt, the Proposed Regulations provide three hurdles the debt must "clear" in order to survive recharacterization as equity: (1) the new documentation requirements, (2) the new transactional requirements recasting debt as equity, and (3) traditional debt versus equity principles. As can be seen, the old test involved one hurdle, while the new test has three. Accordingly, a failure to satisfy any one of the three separate tests will result in the issued debt being recast as equity.18 As elaborated below, a host of consequences, some anticipated and many perhaps not, are sure to follow.

To continue reading this article, please click here

Footnotes

1 81 Fed. Reg. 20912 (proposed Apr. 8, 2016). The Proposed Regulations were issued at the same time as Temporary Regulations, T.D. 9761, 81 Fed. Reg. 20857 (April 4, 2016), which in large part target so-called "inversion" transactions. These Temporary Regulations have already gained notoriety by single-handedly thwarting the $160 billion Pfizer-Allergan merger. The Proposed Regulations, on the other hand, cover an even wider scope, targeting earnings stripping practices both within and without the context of inversion transactions.

2 Under Prop Reg. § 1.385-2(a)(4)(ii), an expanded group instrument, or EGI, is an applicable instrument the issuer of which is one member of an expanded group and the holder of which is another member of the same expanded group. For these purposes, an "expanded group" is a chain of related corporations within the meaning of section 1504(a), without regard to the various restrictions under section 1504(b)(1) through 1504(b)(8), such as, importantly, the rule in section 1504(b)(3) that would otherwise exclude a foreign corporation from the group.

3 There are effectively two thresholds involved: one which applies to the documentation requirements of the Proposed Regulations and one which applies to the debt instruments themselves, both of which substantially restrict the ambit and effect of the Proposed Regulations. The documentation requirements apply to expanded groups (defined below) if either (1) the stock of a member of the expanded group is publicly traded or (2) financial statements of the expanded group or its members show total assets exceeding $100 million or annual total revenue exceeding $50 million. The other debt recharacterization rules apply to the extent that, when issued, the aggregate issue price of all expanded group debt instruments that would otherwise be treated as stock under the new rules exceeds $50 million. Prop. Reg. § 1.385-2(a)(2); Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(c)(2).

4 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(h)(1) provides a transitional rule which will render only debt instruments that are issued on or after April 4, 2016 subject to potential recharacterization as equity.

5 The Treasury Department website indicates that it intends to act quickly to finalize the Proposed Regulations. https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl0404.aspx.

6 This could be either a foreign person or a U.S. tax-exempt entity.

7 Effectively, the concept of adjusted taxable income under section 163(j) approximates the accounting/financial concept of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).

8 This limitation is in contrast to the anti-earnings stripping provisions of many foreign jurisdictions, which focus entirely on a maximum permissible debt-to-equity ratio.

 9 On March 24, 1980, Treasury and the IRS published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (45 FR 18959) under section 385 relating to the treatment of certain interests in corporations as stock or indebtedness. LR-1661, 45 Fed. Reg. 18959 (proposed March 24, 1980). Final regulations were published in the Federal Register on December 31, 1980, which were subsequently revised three times in 1981 and 1982. T.D. 7747, 45 Fed. Reg. 86438 (December 31, 1980). Finally, the Treasury Department and the IRS completely withdrew the section 385 regulations. T.D. 7920 Fed. Reg. 48 Fed. Reg. 50711 (July 6, 1983).

10 In this sense, an anti-earnings stripping provision under Section 385 would seem to impose a more failproof combatant of earnings stripping than, for example, simply increasing or otherwise strengthening the limitation under section 163(j). The section 385 approach will also bring about withholding tax consequences, under which (1) dividends may be taxed at a different rate than interest expense under an applicable treaty and (2) a greater portion of payments may be subject to US tax by virtue of the inability to characterize a portion of payments as repayments of principal.

11 These provisions, included in Prop. Reg. § 1.385-1, include both definitions and specific mechanics involved in recharacterizing debt as equity for tax purposes.

12 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-2

13 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-1(e); Prop. Reg. § 1.385-4.

14 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3.

15 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(h)(3) provides that when recharacterization would otherwise take effect prior to the date the Proposed Regulations are finalized, the debt instrument will be treated as indebtedness until the date that is 90 days after the date the Proposed Regulations are finalized. The transitional rule, which imposes the April 4 bright-line issuance date, is included in Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(h)(1) and Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(h)(2).

16 As of 2015, the United States has, along with Puerto Rico, the third highest corporate tax rate in the world, exceeded only by the United Arab Emirates and Chad, neither of which are in the OECD's group of 34 industrialized nations. At an effective rate (factoring in state and local tax) of approximately 39%, the U.S. rate is also 16 percentage points higher than the worldwide average of 22.8%. OECD Tax Database, Table II.1 – Corporate income tax rates: basic/non-targeted, May 2015, http://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/tax-database.htm.

17 The Proposed Regulations recognize that introducing debt into a structure for business purposes is not indicative of this abuse, and there is therefore an exception for infusion of debt in the ordinary course of business.

18 To the extent debt is recharacterized as equity, there is a deemed exchange whereby the holder is treated as having realized an amount equal to the holder's adjusted basis in that portion of the debt as of the date of the deemed exchange (and as having basis in the stock deemed to be received equal to that amount), and the issuer is treated as having retired that portion of the debt for an amount equal to its adjusted issue price as of the date of the deemed exchange. Prop. Reg. § 1.385-1(c). The mechanics of this deemed exchange are similar to those described under section 108(e)(6) in the context of a related-party debt instrument evidencing debt owed by a subsidiary to its parent and which is retired by way of a contribution to capital. When applicable, no income would be recognized (including cancellation of indebtedness) on the deemed exchange, except any foreign currency gain under section 988.  

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
21 Sep 2018, Conference, Florida, United States

Employment partner, Michael Weil will be participating in The Intellectual Property Law Institute’s 2018 Conference.

26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Employment Partner, Mandy Perry and Chair of Orrick's Global Employment Law Practice, Mike Delikat will be participating in the Global Business Protections 2018: International Restrictive Covenants and Confidential Information Conference.

26 Sep 2018, Seminar, Tokyo, Japan

Orrick’s Global Japan Practice is hosting a series of “Orrick Library” seminars to explore legal issues in various fields in Japan as well as the United States, Asia and Europe

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions