A Non-Trademark Can Prevent The Registration Of Someone Else's Trademark

LR
Lewis Roca

Contributor

Lewis Roca logo
Lewis Roca serves clients around the world in complex litigation, intellectual property, business transactions, labor and employment, regulatory counseling, and government relations.  With legal excellence and exceptional client service, we pride ourselves on our ability to win for our clients while serving their highest goals and needs.   
The Applicant filed for the marks CURVEE and CURVEY and CURVEEY for a variety of clothing items.
United States Intellectual Property

The Applicant filed for the marks CURVEE and CURVEY and CURVEEY for a variety of clothing items. The TTAB refused registration based on CURVY, also for clothes, but existing on the Supplemental Register, not the Principal Register.

At the outset, the TTAB determined that CURVEE and CURVEY and CURVEEY were for all practical purposes equivalent to the cited mark CURVY. Not too surprising.

Also, and as background, a mark placed on the Supplement Register, while not being as advantageous as a mark on the Principal Register, can nevertheless be an important defensive tool for a trademark owner.

Placing a mark on the Supplemental Register is essentially an admission that the mark, at least at the time of registration, is merely descriptive and not eligible for registration.

Despite this fact, a merely descriptive mark, not capable of registration on the Principal Register, can nevertheless be cited by the USPTO as a basis for refusing to register a similar mark on the Principal Register.

In other words, a term that does not function as a trademark can prevent an actual trademark from being registered, if the effort has been put forth to place that non-trademark on the Supplemental Register.

There is a second interesting concept incorporated in this decision. The TTAB also held that the CURVEE and CURVEY and CURVEEY marks were descriptive of clothing designed to be sold to consumers with curvy attributes (i.e., non-skinny people).

Specifically, a mark is deemed descriptive, and not registrable, if it conveys an immediate idea of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, feature, function, purpose or use of the identified goods.

In this case, the TTAB held that the marks were merely descriptive of a characteristic or feature of clothing. Specifically, the clothes were designed for consumers with curvy attributes.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More