United States: Inequitable Conduct For The In-House Manager In The Middle

Unique challenges arise when an in-house attorney or patent manager is tasked with overseeing parallel litigation and reexamination proceedings. While these challenges can be successfully handled, they require considerable knowledge, diligence, and integrity. The recent case Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps South, LLC, Nos. 2015-1132, -1133 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 19, 2016), illustrates the calamity that can result when one or more of these qualities is missing.

The case involved a patent owned by The Ohio Willow Wood Company (OWW), which claimed cushioning elements used in prosthetic devices. At the district court, OWW asserted the patent against Alps South, LLC. Alps responded by filing two successive ex parte reexaminations challenging the validity of the asserted claims. The first reexamination involved prior art in the form of advertisements for a device called the "Silosheath," made by Silipos, Inc. OWW prevailed in the reexamination by demonstrating the allegedly defective Silosheath device to the examiner. Alps then filed the second reexamination based on an advertisement depicting more detail on the Silosheath product line. For support, Alps also presented a declaration and deposition testimony from a Silipos employee, Mr. Jean-Paul Comtesse, who was knowledgeable about the Silosheath prior art. The examiner rejected the claims based on the advertising prior art and Mr. Comtesse's declaration.

On appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), OWW argued that Mr. Comtesse's declaration was unreliable because he was receiving royalties based on the Silosheath product. OWW contended that, absent corroboration regarding the advertising prior art, the prior art was insufficient to sustain the rejection. The Board agreed with OWW, reversing the examiner's rejection and finding that Mr. Comtesse was indeed an interested witness whose testimony was unreliable.

Following a previous appeal to the Federal Circuit, Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps S., LLC, 735 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2013), in which Alps' claim of inequitable conduct was remanded to the district court, the district court held a bench trial on the inequitable conduct issue. The district court found inequitable conduct in the second reexamination, but not in the first. According to the district court, the inequitable conduct arose from the conduct of OWW's Director of Research and Development, Mr. James Colvin, who was tasked with managing both the reexaminations and the parallel district court litigation for OWW. The law firm retained by OWW erected an ethical wall, dividing its lawyers working on the reexaminations and those working on the litigation. As the district court found, Mr. Colvin was the connection between the two sets of proceedings. According to the district court, Mr. Colvin was the decision maker for most issues involving both sets of proceedings. He was also found to have substantial experience with patent matters, both as a business person and as an inventor. The inequitable conduct arose, according to the district court, because Mr. Colvin was aware that the reexamination counsel argued that Mr. Comtesse's testimony was uncorroborated and yet was also aware of materials that did corroborate that testimony.

On appeal, OWW argued that the district court's inequitable conduct findings must be reversed. The Federal Circuit considered the three prongs required to show inequitable conduct, in accordance with Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., 649 F.3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (en banc): (1) one with a duty of candor to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) made misrepresentations or omissions material to patentability, (2) that they did so with the specific intent to mislead or deceive the USPTO, and (3) that deceptive intent was the single most reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence.

As to the first factor, the Federal Circuit found that certain evidence known to, but withheld by, Mr. Colvin, was material to patentability in the second reexamination. In particular, while that evidence was not itself invalidating, it did corroborate the declaration testimony of Mr. Comtesse. Because OWW argued to the Board on appeal that Mr. Comtesse's declaration lacked corroboration and was unreliable, and this was the "dispositive issue" on appeal, this withheld information was material under the "but for" test of Therasense. Regarding intent, the Federal Circuit also found that the withheld evidence corroborating Mr. Comtesse's testimony supported an inference of intent to deceive. As to the third factor, because Mr. Colvin knew of the misrepresentations from OWW's reexamination counsel and failed to correct them, and OWW was unable to offer a reasonable explanation for Mr. Colvin's conduct, the most reasonable inference to be drawn was an intent to deceive the USPTO. Separately, the Federal Circuit rejected Alps' additional inequitable conduct argument in the second reexamination regarding other allegedly material information, since there was no clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Colvin knew of the other allegedly material information.

As Ohio Willow Wood illustrates, an in-house manager occupies a difficult position when he or she manages concurrent litigation and post-grant validity challenge proceedings. Although the case involved ex parte reexaminations, similar difficulties may arise with respect to inter partes review, covered business method review, and post-grant review proceedings. In addition to the numerous challenges associated with maintaining consistent legal and factual positions in both sets of proceedings—and seeking to simultaneously establish validity and infringement—the in-house employee must be keenly aware of the duties of candor and disclosure to the USPTO. When information material to patentability arises in the litigation, the in-house employee incurs a duty to have that information disclosed to the USPTO in the post-grant validity challenge. Further, when the veracity of a representation made to the USPTO is thrown into contradiction by newly discovered evidence, the in-house employee likewise must inform the USPTO. As Ohio Willow Wood demonstrates, allowing a misrepresentation to the USPTO to be made, and ultimately become a deciding factor on the issue of patentability, can subject the employee's company to a finding of inequitable conduct. In such circumstances, inaction by the in-house employee is not a defense.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

1 Oct 2018, Seminar, New York, United States

Finnegan partner Doug Rettew will consider recent Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) developments during Practicing Law Institute’s Intellectual Property Institute.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions