United States: US Financial Stability Oversight Council Focuses On Asset Management Products And Activities

US Financial Stability Oversight Council Focuses on Asset Management Products and Activities

On April 18, 2016, the US Financial Stability Oversight Council issued an update on its multi-year review of potential financial stability risks in the asset management industry. This note highlights takeaways from that report, summarizes its key sections and predicts next steps.

Here are the highlights:

  • FSOC believes alleged liquidity mismatches (particularly for mutual funds), high leverage (particularly for hedge funds) and other industry practices present potential risks to financial stability.
  • FSOC believes regulators do not collect sufficient data to understand the scope or nature of these risks.
  • FSOC is creating an interagency working group to assess potential risks associated with leveraged hedge funds. The working group must report its findings to FSOC by the fourth quarter of 20161

Brief Background

The creation of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (typically abbreviated to FSOC) was a centerpiece of US regulatory reform legislation that followed the 2008-2009 financial crisis. FSOC coordinates financial stability initiatives across otherwise separate financial regulators and is chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury.

FSOC voting membership, in addition to the Treasury Secretary, includes the heads of the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Deposit Insurance Company, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Federal Housing Finance Agency and National Credit Union Administration, plus an independent member with insurance expertise appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate2.

Related International Focus

  • The issues raised by FSOC have been vexing policy makers and regulators since the financial crisis. The UK's Turner Review,3 published in 2009, focused on activities carried out by hedge funds and similar entities. It called for regulators to be given powers to collect extensive data on hedge fund activities and other forms of investment intermediation so as to consider their macro-economic risks. In addition, the review considered that regulators should have powers to apply prudential regulation to hedge fund activities that were bank-like in nature or of systemic importance.
  • Issues identified in the Turner Review also have been considered at the international level by the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body that monitors and makes recommendations about the global financial system. FSB has announced its intention to consult in mid-2016 on the risks posed by funds' liquidity mismatch, leverage within funds, operational risk, challenges in transferring investment mandates in a stressed situation and securities lending activities of asset managers and funds—in other words, most of the same themes addressed in FSOC's report. FSB recommendations are expected by the end of the year.4
  • In Europe, the European Commission's Capital Markets Union is based, in part, on expanding market-based intermediation to fuel EU economic growth. This objective is tempered through regulation to increase transparency, such as the Securities Financing Transaction Regulation (SFTR) which requires firms to reportsecurities financing transactions, and regulatory monitoring for concentration risks, cross border exposures and regulatory arbitrage. Other initiatives aim to revive the securitization market—by providing preferential regulatory capital treatment for investors, in particular bank and investment firm investors, in simple, transparent and standardized securitizations—as well as develop a harmonized approach to the regulation of new innovations such as crowdfunding platforms. Regulation of non-bank credit intermediation remains under consideration.

What Does This Mean?

  • Regulatory focus on asset management "activities" rather than individual firms. Asset managers appear to have fended off so-called "systemically significant" designations for individual firms (at least by US regulators). The industry did so in part by urging regulators to focus on inspecting "activities" rather than firms. This report can be understood, at least in part, as a response from FSOC to that industry position.
  • Regulatory focus on the largest hedge funds. Regulators are likely to focus on the largest hedge funds and have already developed screens to identify these funds with data from SEC Form PF. This is implicitly phrased in the report as its most urgent area of inquiry and also is the aspect that has generated the most press coverage.
  • Intensified data collection. Regulators have two ways to address the information gaps that concern FSOC. One approach is to do more with existing data; for example, identifying which regulators have access to which kinds of data and doing more to synthesize and harmonize their different pools of data. The other approach is to simply request new data from regulated asset managers, their lenders, brokers, counterparties, etc.
    • Until new reporting rules are implemented (and presumably those are coming), any additional information presumably will have to be sought through some combination of mandatory, voluntary or semi-voluntary requests by regulators—who might act singly (e.g., the SEC only) or in groups (e.g., the SEC and Federal Reserve contact a firm together). That in turn suggests targeted information sweeps of large hedge funds or other asset managers and/or the banks and broker-dealers that act as lending, derivatives or trading counterparties.
    • Potentially, these sweeps could expand to derivatives clearinghouses and execution facilities.
    • One also should not assume that rulemaking or other activity in this area will be confined to one side of the industry (e.g., that regulators will be satisfied with hedge fund leverage data developed only from banks or only from funds). A multi-pronged effort that comes at the relevant information from different directions seems likely.
  • Application of bank regulatory themes to funds. A subtext to the report is a generalized concern that longstanding bank roles such as the provision of liquidity to markets and extensions of credit have "migrated" to less regulated funds. Liquidity, leverage, outsourcing and resolvability, themes in the report, are areas of keen interest to bank regulators post-financial crisis, so it is no surprise that they should be extended to funds here.
  • Political dynamics remain uncertain. FSOC speaks for a broad group of regulators with varying agendas, interests and roles as relate to the asset management industry.
    • As an illustration of potentially differing views, the SEC press release accompanying the FSOC report reads as guarded. Chair White pointedly recites the agency's mantra that the SEC is the "primary regulator" in this sphere and goes on to say that: "Today's FSOC update should not be read as an indication of the direction that the SEC's final asset management rules may take."
    • Congress, under Republican leadership, generally has been skeptical of FSOC's asset management initiatives.

Summary of the Report

FSOC's report on the asset management industry builds on a related 2014 roundtable and request for comment and is FSOC's most comprehensive statement in this area to date. Key sections from the report, which address perceived risks associated with (1) liquidity and redemption; (2) leverage; (3) operational considerations; (4) securities lending; and (5) winding down and liquidation, are summarized below.

  1. Liquidity and Redemption Risk

In its discussion of liquidity and redemption risk, FSOC points to pooled investment vehicles and the risk of so- called "liquidity mismatch," focusing in particular on mutual funds, which usually allow investors to redeem daily while holding (and thus potentially needing to sell to satisfy a redemption) somewhat longer-term assets. For these funds, FSOC is especially concerned that large redemptions may occur during a stress event, with the fund and its non-redeeming investors potentially bearing significant costs in selling assets.

As an example of liquidity mismatch, FSOC points to the closure of high-yield bond fund Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund, which was unable to meet redemptions in December 2015 and ultimately closed. The report suggests the fund's portfolio was somewhat anomalous (less liquid and more heavily invested in distressed assets than competitors). FSOC also acknowledges that other high-yield bond mutual funds met redemption requests despite widespread redemption and selling pressures. FSOC nonetheless suggests that had the distress spread and led to other fund closures, it could have driven broader market instability.

Given its concerns, FSOC proposes the following steps:5

  • Adopt liquidity risk management practices. Mutual funds, especially those in less-liquid assets, should adopt risk management practices to reduce the risk of not being able to meet redemptions during stress events;
  • Establish regulatory guidelines on liquidity. FSOC suggests the establishment of regulatory guidelines addressing limits on mutual funds' ability to hold assets with very limited liquidity;
  • Enhance reporting and disclosures on liquidity. FSOC proposes enhanced reporting and disclosures by mutual funds of their liquidity profiles and risk management practices;
  • Allocate redemption costs to redeeming investors. Regulators should assess how mutual funds could allocate redemption costs to investors who redeem shares. FSOC believes allocating redemption costs in this way could reduce redemptions and the potential for widespread sales of less-liquid assets during stress events;
  • Disclose external sources of financing to the public. FSOC supports public disclosure and analysis of external sources of financing (e.g., lines of credit and interfund lending), including events that trigger use of external financing. FSOC is concerned that draws on financing could create liquidity stress for broader markets; and
  • Consider other pooled investment vehicles. Regulators should consider whether the above suggestions or other measures should be implemented for similar vehicles with daily redemptions (e.g., bank collective funds).


1 The full FSOC report is available at https://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fsoc/news/Documents/ FSOC%20Update%20on%20Review%20of%20Asset%20Management%20Products%20and%20Activities.pdf

2 The regulators are listed as they appear in Treasury's FSOC FAQ, which is available at https://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fsoc/about/Pages/default.aspx. In addition to the Council's ten voting members, there are five non-voting members who serve in an advisory capacity.

3 The Turner Review was a report produced by the Financial Services Authority in 2009 under the leadership of Lord Turner who chaired the FSA at the time. The FSA has since been split into the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. 4 The FSB announcement, made in March 2016, is available here.

5 These proposals will be familiar to the mutual fund industry as they track pending SEC liquidity rules for mutual funds. Shearman & Sterling's summary of those proposals is available at http://www.shearman.com/en/newsinsights/publications/2015/10/liquidity-of-mutual-fund-portfolios.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Barnabas W.B. Reynolds
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions