United States: Federal Circuit Patent Updates - April 2016

Last Updated: April 25 2016
Article by WilmerHale

View previous updates...

Genetic Technologies Limited v. Merial LLC (No. 2015-1202, 4/8/16) (Prost, Dyk, Taranto)

April 8, 2016 11:18 AM

Dyk, J. Affirming dismissal for failure to state a claim because the asserted claim was ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The asserted claim was directed to a law of nature and thus failed the first step of the Mayo/Alice test. "Claim 1 is directed to the relationship between non-coding and coding sequences in linkage disequilibrium and the tendency of such non-coding DNA sequences to be representative of the linked coding sequence – a law of nature." Patentee argued unsuccessfully that the claim's requirement of analyzing amplified DNA "to detect the allele" satisfied the second step of the Mayo/Alice test. The claim term "'to detect the allele' (in the sense of examining the non-coding region to detect an allele in the coding region) is a mental process step, one that provides [the claim] with a purpose but does not create the requisite inventive concept, because it merely sets forth a routine comparison that can be performed by the human mind."  

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Rembrandt Vision Techs., L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care (No. 2015-1079, 4/7/16) (Dyk, Moore, Stoll)

April 7, 2016 1:55 PM

Stoll, J. Reversing denial of motion for new trial and remanding for a new trial. Following the trial, plaintiff learned that defendant's expert testified falsely during the trial. "[H]e testified falsely about his personal involvement in the testing, as well as his experience with the relevant testing methodologies. He also withheld contradictory test results on third-party lenses known to infringe and generated at the request of [defendant's] counsel. Because these test results were not produced, [defendant's expert] testified without contradiction about alleged differences between the accused lenses and third-party lenses to show that the accused lenses did not have the claimed surface layer...  Under these circumstances, we cannot agree with the district court that this conduct did not prevent [plaintiff] from fully and fairly presenting its infringement case. The verdict was irretrievably tainted..." Dyk, J. dissented. 

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Cutsforth, Inc. v. Motivepower, Inc. (No. 2015-1314, 4/6/16) (Prost, Clevenger, Moore)

April 6, 2016 3:20 PM

Moore, J. Reversing Board's claim constructions and anticipation decisions in inter partes review. "The Board's interpretation of 'a projection extending from the mounting block' far exceeds the scope of its plain meaning and is not justified by the specification. We hold that the Board's interpretation, which encompasses a structure that recedes into the mounting block rather than jutting out from it, is unreasonable." Also reversing construction that permitted a claim element to be "a sub-component of the 'beam' and still be considered to be 'coupled to the beam.'"

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

HP Inc. v. MPHJ Technology Investments (No. 2015-1427, 4/5/16) (Lourie, Schall, Hughes)

April 5, 2016 6:50 PM

Lourie, J. Affirming Board decision in inter partes review ("IPR"). The Board instituted IPR on anticipation grounds but declined to institute on the petitioner's obviousness ground, finding that the obviousness ground was redundant.  The final written decision then found that one of the challenged claims was not anticipated. Petitioner unsuccessfully challenged the Board's refusal to institute on the obviousness ground. "[W]e cannot review [petitioner's] argument that the Board erred by instituting review on only a subset of grounds, and we conclude that the Board did not err in only addressing the instituted grounds in its final written decision... Allowing an APA challenge to the Board's decision to institute on the basis that the Board had insufficiently articulated its reasoning would eviscerate § 314(d) by allowing substantive review of the institution decision." The Court also noted that the IPR estoppel provisions would not apply to noninstituted grounds. "[T]he noninstituted grounds do not become part of the IPR. Accordingly, the noninstituted grounds were not raised and, as review was denied, could not be raised in the IPR. Therefore, the estoppel provisions of § 315(e)(1) do not apply."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Pride Mobility Products Corp. v. Permobil, Inc. (No. 2015-1585, -1586, 4/5/16) (Reyna, Taranto, Chen)

April 5, 2016 4:35 PM

Taranto, J. Affirming cancellation of multiple claims of two patents related to wheelchairs. Also reversing Board's construction of "mounting plate [that] is substantially perpendicular to the drive wheel axis" and reversing cancelation of one dependent claim based on that construction.

WilmerHale represented the Appellee, Permobil, Inc.

A full version of the text available in PDF form.

Cardpool, Inc. v. Plastic Jungle, Inc. (No. 2014-1562, 4/5/16) (Newman, Reyna, Wallach)

April 5, 2016 3:18 PM

Newman, J. Affirming denial of joint motion to vacate judgment of invalidity.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

High Point Sarl v. Sprint Nextel Corporation (No. 2015-1298, 4/5/16) (Reyna, Mayer, Chen)

April 5, 2016 1:28 PM

Reyna, J. Affirming summary judgment that patentee is equitably estopped from prosecuting suit.

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Simpleair, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile (No. 2015-1251, 4/1/16) (Moore, Reyna, Wallach)

April 1, 2016 11:423PM

Wallach, J. Vacating verdict, vacating denial of JMOL and remanding with instructions to enter judgment of non-infringement. The district court incorrectly construed "data channel" and "whether said computing devices are online or offline from a data channel associated with each device" and there was no infringement under the correct construction. "The choice to use 'data channel' in claim 1 rather than 'data feed,' notwithstanding use of the latter elsewhere in the patent, lends further support to our conclusion that 'data feed' does not carry the same meaning as 'data channel.'" The Court also stated regarding claim construction that it "is true that 'interpretations that render some portion of the claim language superfluous are disfavored.' [citation omitted] The preference for giving meaning to all terms, however, is not an inflexible rule that supersedes all other principles of claim construction."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

Microsoft Corporation v. Geotag, Inc. (No. 2015-1140, 4/1/16) (Lourie, Wallach, Stoll)

April 1, 2016 9:22 AM

Wallach, J. Affirming summary judgment of non-infringement and affirming subject matter jurisdiction decision. Federal Circuit law, rather than Third Circuit law, governed the question of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court found that even if the declaratory judgment complaint were dismissed or deficient, the district court properly retained subject matter jurisdiction over patent infringement counterclaims. Distinguishing DataTern, the Court stated that the DataTern decision "did not consider the distinct question of whether a district court could retain subject matter jurisdiction over a counterclaim if a complaint is dismissed or deemed defective." "We have not addressed whether a counterclaim's permissive or compulsory status is relevant to retaining jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338. However, nothing in the text of section 1338 suggests that Congress conditioned its grant of jurisdiction to the District Court on the compulsory or permissive nature of the counterclaim." Regarding non-infringement, because the accused product "searches its entire database without regard to geography and then filters the results, rather than searches only within a targeted geographic area and automatically adds results from outside that area in the manner claimed by the [asserted] patent, [the accused product] does not practice 'dynamic replication' under any construction of that limitation."

A full version of the text is available in PDF form.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions