United States: West Virginia Imposes Sales Tax On Service Provider Due To Presence Of In-State Independent Contractors

The Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the West Virginia Office of Tax Appeals recently ruled that independent contractors performing work within the state on behalf of a company with no physical presence in West Virginia created substantial nexus for the company.1 In ruling for the Tax Commissioner, the ALJ relied on prior U.S. Supreme Court rulings in this area to determine that sufficient nexus was created by the independent contractors' activities and the tax assessed by West Virginia was constitutional under the dormant Commerce Clause.


The company at issue in this matter was an out-of-state provider of exterior facilities maintenance management, and offered services including snow and ice removal, landscaping services, parking lot maintenance, window washing, and minor building repairs. The company had four national customers with locations in 20 states, including West Virginia.

The company contracted service providers that it characterized as independent contractors. The service providers completed the work under the supervision of the company, which was made possible through the use of proprietary software monitoring the services in real time and requiring the service providers to submit photographs of their completed work. The company did not have any employees or property in West Virginia, and did not advertise in the state.

In October 2012, the Auditing Division of the West Virginia State Tax Department issued four assessments against the company. The assessments covered various periods from 2007-2012 for the West Virginia use tax, sales and service use tax, sales tax, and corporate net income and business franchise taxes. The company filed an appeal in November 2012 arguing that it did not have a physical presence in West Virginia and was not subject to the sales and service use tax, or sales tax portions of the assessments.

Overview of Prior U.S. Supreme Court Rulings

The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed activities supporting substantial nexus determinations on numerous occasions dating back to 1960, when the Court was presented with the Scripto, Inc. v. Carson2 case. Scripto was a Georgia taxpayer in the business of shipping writing instruments to out-of-state jurisdictions including Florida. Scripto argued that, because it had no employees or offices in Florida, the imposition of use tax regarding its Florida sales violated both its due process rights and burdened interstate commerce. However, the Court determined that Scripto had sufficient nexus with Florida due to the presence of commissioned salesmen in the state acting on Scripto's behalf. As a result, the Supreme Court decreed that retailers could be physically present in a state through those acting on their behalf, such as agents.

Over 30 years later, in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota,3 an out-of-state mail order catalog vendor argued that the taxing state did not have the power to impose sales tax because the company lacked sufficient connections with the state. Quill's only contact with North Dakota was the delivery of catalogs to potential customers through the postal service, and the use of common carriers to deliver goods to actual customers. In contrast to Scripto, the Court found in favor of the taxpayer, ruling that a taxpayer must have a physical presence in a state in order to require collection of sales or use tax for purchases made by in-state customers.

In the intervening time between the Scripto and Quill cases, the Court weighed in on several state tax nexus controversies. In 1967, in National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue,4 a mail-order company whose sole contact with the taxing state derived from the delivery of catalogs and goods sold via postal service and common carrier, respectively, was not subject to sales tax. In 1977, the Court created a four-prong test regarding the constitutionality of taxation under the Commerce Clause in Complete Auto Transit v. Brady.5 As a result, "[a] state tax on interstate commerce will not be sustained unless it: (1) has a substantial nexus with the State; (2) is fairly apportioned; (3) does not discriminate; and (4) is fairly related to the services provided by the State."

In National Geographic Society v. California Board of Equalization,6 a mail order vendor had two sales offices located in California. National Geographic argued that these offices were strictly used to support the advertising staff of the magazine and had nothing to do with their catalog sales. The Court ruled that, regardless of the nature of the offices, their presence provided National Geographic with an advantage to establish a market, in addition to access to municipal services, such as fire and police protection.

Finally, in Tyler Pipe v. Washington State Department of Revenue,7 a company did not have any employees or property in the state. However, the company did have one out-of-state sales executive and one in-state independent contractor, both of whom were soliciting sales from Washington customers on behalf of Tyler Pipe. The Court again cited Scripto and ruled that, although the salesmen were not employees of Tyler Pipe, the presence of instate representatives was sufficient to establish nexus and that it was not constitutionally significant whether the representative was designated an "employee" or "independent contractor."

Use of Independent Contractors Established Nexus in West Virginia

Generally, West Virginia imposes sales and use tax on the provision of services unless specifically exempt.8 Accordingly, landscaping and snow removal services are not excluded under West Virginia statute and as such, are subject to tax. Neither the company nor the Department disputed this conclusion. The issue at hand was whether or not the company had sufficient nexus in West Virginia to require it to collect and remit sales tax from its West Virginia customers pursuant to the dormant Commerce Clause.

The West Virginia Tax Commissioner relied mainly on Scripto, arguing that there was no difference between the salesman in Scripto and the company's independent contractors performing the landscaping and snow removal services in West Virginia. The company argued that Quill precluded the state from imposing sales tax on its activities, because it lacked a physical presence in West Virginia. In addition to Quill, the company also cited to National Bellas Hess, Complete Auto Transit and National Geographic to support its argument that a sufficient connection to West Virginia did not exist.

The ALJ agreed with the Commissioner, finding that the company's facts establishing nexus were stronger than those in Scripto, because the independent contractors at issue were performing all of the business activity in West Virginia. Additionally, without the independent contractors, the company would not be able to perform services in the state and thus, would not have any revenue derived from West Virginia customers. In contrast, the company in Scripto merely employed salesmen that were soliciting business and signing the contracts. In addition, the ALJ found that the company failed to specifically address how it did not have a physical presence in West Virginia.


The ALJ noted that the "sharp distinction . . . between mail order sellers with retail outlets, solicitors, or property within a State, and those who do no more than communicate with customers in the State by mail or common carrier as part of a general interstate business"9 established by the Supreme Court in National Bellas Hess was evident in the current case, because the company had a direct presence in West Virginia through persons operating on its behalf. To expand upon this distinction and how it applies to current tax issues, the ALJ referred to cases involving Internet travel companies, such as Travelscape, LLC v. South Carolina Department of Revenue.10 Similarly, substantial nexus was created in South Carolina for Travelscape, an out-of-state Internet travel company, based on having employees visiting the state to negotiate contracts with South Carolina hotels. The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that, without South Carolina hotels providing rooms, Travelscape would not have had business in the state.

As states continue to expand their definition of nexus and thus, their taxing authority, through interpretation of existing statutes and the introduction of affiliate and economic nexus statutes, it is important for taxpayers to continually monitor changing nexus standards and their own state activities. Using independent contractors on a multistate basis, especially in connection with solicitation of sales, customer service, installation, and other activity related to the sale of products or services raises the distinct risk that state tax authorities will impose significant sales tax obligations as a result.


1 Redacted Decision – DK#'s 12-432 U, 12-433 CU, 12-434 C, 12-435 NFN, West Virginia Office of Tax Appeals, Jan. 30, 2015 (released Jan. 27, 2016).

2 362 U.S. 207 (1960).

3 504 U.S. 298 (1992).

4 386 U.S. 753 (1967).

5 430 U.S. 274 (1977).

6 430 U.S. 551 (1977).

7 483 U.S. 232 (1987).

8 W. VA. CODE § 11-15-3(a).

9 Quoting National Bellas Hess v. Department of Revenue, 386 U.S. 753, 758.

10 705 S.E.2d 28 (S.C. 2011).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions