United States: Artificial Vs. Economic Impairment Of Claims – The Sixth Circuit Rules

Last Updated: April 13 2016
Article by Peter C. Blain

United States Bankruptcy Code1 section 1129(a)(10) requires that, unless all claims are unimpaired, at least one impaired class of noninsider claimholders must accept a plan of reorganization before the plan can be confirmed.  Where there are only a few separate classes of claims, in real estate cases for example, even though a plan proponent may have the economic ability to pay a small class of claimants in full, the proponent will often defer full payment of a small class for a short period of time to create this requisite accepting impaired class.  This has been styled "artificial," as opposed to "economic," impairment.  In In re Village Green I, GP[i]2, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals becomes the fourth circuit court to address the issue of artificial impairment, and its decision sets a standard distinct from its fellow circuits.

The Ninth Circuit was the first circuit to address the issue in In re L&J Anaheim Associates.3  In that case, Kawasaki, which was owed $13.2 million secured by a hotel, proposed a creditor plan which actually resulted in an improvement of its prepetition position. The debtor argued that an improvement in position did not constitute "impairment" under Code section 1124. The bankruptcy court disagreed and confirmed the plan. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit ruled that "impairment" means that a creditor's legal, equitable or contractual rights are altered under the plan, and that the plan changed Kawasaki's state law rights. No particular alteration was required, said the court,  whether the alteration resulted in an improvement.4  However, the plan proponent must still comply with the requirement that the plan be proposed in good faith pursuant to Code section 1129(a)(3).

That same year, the Eighth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in In re Windsor on the River Associates Ltd.5  In that case, a secured creditor which was owed $9.8 million (constituting approximately 99% of the claims in the case) appealed confirmation of a plan that provided that the claims in an accepting unsecured class, totaling approximately $13,000, would be paid in 60 days and therefore the class was impaired.  The Eighth Circuit found that the claims could have been paid in full on the effective date and therefore were "arbitrarily and artificially impaired."6 The court held that "a claim is not impaired [for the purposes of § 1129(a)(10)] if the alteration of [the] rights in question arises solely from the debtor's exercise of discretion."7  Section 1129(a)(10), said the court, recognizes impairment only to the extent it is driven by economic need.8

Twenty years later, the Fifth Circuit considered the question of artificial versus economic impairment in In re Village at Camp Bowie I L.P.9 There, an unsecured class comprised of claimants owed a total $38,000 accepted a plan which paid them in full over three months even though it was undisputed that the plan could have paid them in full on the effective date. The secured creditor, which voted its deficiency claim to reject the plan, asserted that the artificial impairment contravened Code section 1129(a)(10) and also violated the requirement that the plan be proposed in good faith under Code section 1129(a)(3). The bankruptcy court rejected both arguments, concluding that Code section 1129(a)(10) did not distinguish between artificial and economic impairment, and that  artificial impairment did not amount to per se bad faith, and the secured creditor appealed.

After considering both L&J Anaheim Associates and Windsor, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court adopting the Ninth Circuit's view that Code section 1129(a)(10) does not distinguish between discretionary and artificial impairment.10  The court reasoned:

By shoehorning a motive inquiry and materiality requirement into § 1129(a)(10), Windsor warps the text of the Code, requiring a court to "deem" a claim unimpaired for the purposes of § 1129(a)(10) even though it plainly qualifies as impaired under § 1124.  Windsor's motive inquiry is also inconsistent with § 1123(b)(1), which provides that a plan proponent "may impair or leave unimpaired any class of claims," and does not contain any indication that impairment must be driven by economic motives.11

However, the court also concluded that Code section 1129(a)(10) must be scrutinized in light of the good‑faith requirements of Code section 1129(a)(3), and that plan proponents do not enjoy a "free pass" under that section.12  Where the accepting creditor class was not comprised of independent third parties who extended ordinary course pre‑petition trade debt, or the class was created out of whole cloth, particularly if the class members were related to the proponent, or there is evidence of a sham, an inference of bad faith may arise.13

In October 2015, the Sixth Circuit again took up the issue of discretionary impairment under Code sections 1124 and 1129(a)(10) in In re Village Green I, GP.14  In that case, the debtor proposed a plan which impaired an unsecured class comprised of the debtor's lawyer and accountant, owed a total of less than $2,400, by paying them over 60 days after the effective date.  The secured creditor holding both a secured and an unsecured deficiency claim objected to confirmation and the bankruptcy court overruled the objection and confirmed the plan. The secured creditor appealed.15

The Sixth Circuit found that whether the impairment of a class is contrived is irrelevant for the purposes of Code section 1124.  That section provides that altering the legal rights of the claimants is impairment without any inquiry into the motives of the plan proponent.  Citing Camp Bowie, the court concluded that the unsecured class was clearly impaired, while acknowledging that Windsor held to the contrary.16

However, said the court, the proponent's motives are expressly the business of Code section 1129(a)(3), which requires the plan to be proposed in good faith.17 The court found that Village Green's unsecured claims could be paid in full on the effective date, contrary to the debtor's assertion that it needed to ration every dollar. Moreover, the close relationship of the claimholders to the debtor, and the fact that the claimholders refused to accept payment in full from the secured creditor, convinced the court that the claimant's impairment was "transparently an artifice to circumvent the purposes of § 1129(a)(10)."18

It is hard to say where Village Green leaves practitioners.  The Sixth Circuit joins with the Fifth and Ninth in holding that any impairment, whether discretionary or economic, is sufficient to meet the requirements of Code sections 1124 and 1129(a)(10).  This clearly seems correct.  However, where a debtor with only a few classes of creditors necessarily pushes the envelope by minimally impairing a small class of creditors, the good faith requirements of Code section 1129(a)(3) also clearly authorize an inquiry into the proponent's motives for the impairment.  Where secured and deficiency claims total millions of dollars, the difference between $2,400 in Village Green and $38,000 in Camp Bowie seems insignificant The upshot may be that while a proponent's employment of minor discretionary (rather than economic) impairment is sufficient to jump the Code section 1129(a)(10) hurdle of having an impaired class accept the plan, the debtor's motive in meeting that requirement is fair game for the bankruptcy court to find an absence of good faith and doom confirmation.  This will likely make it harder to predict how any given bankruptcy court will rule on confirmation on any particular day.  Perhaps the only alternative in many real estate and similar cases is to make sure the class of impaired unsecured claims is comprised of bona fide creditors . . . and cross your fingers.


1 11 U.S.C. §§ 101‑1532 (the "Code").

2 Vill. Green I  GP v. Fed. Nat'l Mort.Ass'n (In re Vill. Green I, GP), 811 F.3d 816 (6th Cir. 2015).

3 L&J Anaheim Associates v. Kawasaki Leasing International Inc. (In re L&J Anaheim Associates), 995 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1993).

4 Id. at 943.

5 Windsor on the River Assocs. Ltd. v. Balcor Real Estate Fin. Inc. (In re Windsor on the River Assocs. Ltd.), 7 F.3d 127 (8th Cir. 1993).

6 Id. at 132.

7 Id.

8 Id. at 132‑33.

9 W. Real Estate Equities L.L.C. v. Vill. of Camp Bowie I L.P. (In re Vill. of Camp Bowie I L.P.), 710 F.3d 239 (5th Cir. 2013).

10 Id. at 245.

11 Id.at 245‑46 (citations omitted).

12 Id. at 248.

13 Id.

14 (In re Vill. Green I, GP), 811 F.3d 816 (6th Cir. 2015).

15 On appeal, the district court remanded to the bankruptcy court to determine whether the plan had been proposed in good faith.  The bankruptcy court found that the plan was proposed in good faith and confirmed the plan again. The district court vacated and remanded, which caused the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case and lift the automatic stay, which resulted in the appeal to the Circuit Court.  Id. at 818.

16 Id. at 818‑19.

17 Id. at 819.

18 Id.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Peter C. Blain
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.