United States: Artificial Vs. Economic Impairment Of Claims – The Sixth Circuit Rules

Last Updated: April 13 2016
Article by Peter C. Blain

United States Bankruptcy Code1 section 1129(a)(10) requires that, unless all claims are unimpaired, at least one impaired class of noninsider claimholders must accept a plan of reorganization before the plan can be confirmed.  Where there are only a few separate classes of claims, in real estate cases for example, even though a plan proponent may have the economic ability to pay a small class of claimants in full, the proponent will often defer full payment of a small class for a short period of time to create this requisite accepting impaired class.  This has been styled "artificial," as opposed to "economic," impairment.  In In re Village Green I, GP[i]2, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals becomes the fourth circuit court to address the issue of artificial impairment, and its decision sets a standard distinct from its fellow circuits.

The Ninth Circuit was the first circuit to address the issue in In re L&J Anaheim Associates.3  In that case, Kawasaki, which was owed $13.2 million secured by a hotel, proposed a creditor plan which actually resulted in an improvement of its prepetition position. The debtor argued that an improvement in position did not constitute "impairment" under Code section 1124. The bankruptcy court disagreed and confirmed the plan. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit ruled that "impairment" means that a creditor's legal, equitable or contractual rights are altered under the plan, and that the plan changed Kawasaki's state law rights. No particular alteration was required, said the court,  whether the alteration resulted in an improvement.4  However, the plan proponent must still comply with the requirement that the plan be proposed in good faith pursuant to Code section 1129(a)(3).

That same year, the Eighth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in In re Windsor on the River Associates Ltd.5  In that case, a secured creditor which was owed $9.8 million (constituting approximately 99% of the claims in the case) appealed confirmation of a plan that provided that the claims in an accepting unsecured class, totaling approximately $13,000, would be paid in 60 days and therefore the class was impaired.  The Eighth Circuit found that the claims could have been paid in full on the effective date and therefore were "arbitrarily and artificially impaired."6 The court held that "a claim is not impaired [for the purposes of § 1129(a)(10)] if the alteration of [the] rights in question arises solely from the debtor's exercise of discretion."7  Section 1129(a)(10), said the court, recognizes impairment only to the extent it is driven by economic need.8

Twenty years later, the Fifth Circuit considered the question of artificial versus economic impairment in In re Village at Camp Bowie I L.P.9 There, an unsecured class comprised of claimants owed a total $38,000 accepted a plan which paid them in full over three months even though it was undisputed that the plan could have paid them in full on the effective date. The secured creditor, which voted its deficiency claim to reject the plan, asserted that the artificial impairment contravened Code section 1129(a)(10) and also violated the requirement that the plan be proposed in good faith under Code section 1129(a)(3). The bankruptcy court rejected both arguments, concluding that Code section 1129(a)(10) did not distinguish between artificial and economic impairment, and that  artificial impairment did not amount to per se bad faith, and the secured creditor appealed.

After considering both L&J Anaheim Associates and Windsor, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court adopting the Ninth Circuit's view that Code section 1129(a)(10) does not distinguish between discretionary and artificial impairment.10  The court reasoned:

By shoehorning a motive inquiry and materiality requirement into § 1129(a)(10), Windsor warps the text of the Code, requiring a court to "deem" a claim unimpaired for the purposes of § 1129(a)(10) even though it plainly qualifies as impaired under § 1124.  Windsor's motive inquiry is also inconsistent with § 1123(b)(1), which provides that a plan proponent "may impair or leave unimpaired any class of claims," and does not contain any indication that impairment must be driven by economic motives.11

However, the court also concluded that Code section 1129(a)(10) must be scrutinized in light of the good‑faith requirements of Code section 1129(a)(3), and that plan proponents do not enjoy a "free pass" under that section.12  Where the accepting creditor class was not comprised of independent third parties who extended ordinary course pre‑petition trade debt, or the class was created out of whole cloth, particularly if the class members were related to the proponent, or there is evidence of a sham, an inference of bad faith may arise.13

In October 2015, the Sixth Circuit again took up the issue of discretionary impairment under Code sections 1124 and 1129(a)(10) in In re Village Green I, GP.14  In that case, the debtor proposed a plan which impaired an unsecured class comprised of the debtor's lawyer and accountant, owed a total of less than $2,400, by paying them over 60 days after the effective date.  The secured creditor holding both a secured and an unsecured deficiency claim objected to confirmation and the bankruptcy court overruled the objection and confirmed the plan. The secured creditor appealed.15

The Sixth Circuit found that whether the impairment of a class is contrived is irrelevant for the purposes of Code section 1124.  That section provides that altering the legal rights of the claimants is impairment without any inquiry into the motives of the plan proponent.  Citing Camp Bowie, the court concluded that the unsecured class was clearly impaired, while acknowledging that Windsor held to the contrary.16

However, said the court, the proponent's motives are expressly the business of Code section 1129(a)(3), which requires the plan to be proposed in good faith.17 The court found that Village Green's unsecured claims could be paid in full on the effective date, contrary to the debtor's assertion that it needed to ration every dollar. Moreover, the close relationship of the claimholders to the debtor, and the fact that the claimholders refused to accept payment in full from the secured creditor, convinced the court that the claimant's impairment was "transparently an artifice to circumvent the purposes of § 1129(a)(10)."18

It is hard to say where Village Green leaves practitioners.  The Sixth Circuit joins with the Fifth and Ninth in holding that any impairment, whether discretionary or economic, is sufficient to meet the requirements of Code sections 1124 and 1129(a)(10).  This clearly seems correct.  However, where a debtor with only a few classes of creditors necessarily pushes the envelope by minimally impairing a small class of creditors, the good faith requirements of Code section 1129(a)(3) also clearly authorize an inquiry into the proponent's motives for the impairment.  Where secured and deficiency claims total millions of dollars, the difference between $2,400 in Village Green and $38,000 in Camp Bowie seems insignificant The upshot may be that while a proponent's employment of minor discretionary (rather than economic) impairment is sufficient to jump the Code section 1129(a)(10) hurdle of having an impaired class accept the plan, the debtor's motive in meeting that requirement is fair game for the bankruptcy court to find an absence of good faith and doom confirmation.  This will likely make it harder to predict how any given bankruptcy court will rule on confirmation on any particular day.  Perhaps the only alternative in many real estate and similar cases is to make sure the class of impaired unsecured claims is comprised of bona fide creditors . . . and cross your fingers.


1 11 U.S.C. §§ 101‑1532 (the "Code").

2 Vill. Green I  GP v. Fed. Nat'l Mort.Ass'n (In re Vill. Green I, GP), 811 F.3d 816 (6th Cir. 2015).

3 L&J Anaheim Associates v. Kawasaki Leasing International Inc. (In re L&J Anaheim Associates), 995 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1993).

4 Id. at 943.

5 Windsor on the River Assocs. Ltd. v. Balcor Real Estate Fin. Inc. (In re Windsor on the River Assocs. Ltd.), 7 F.3d 127 (8th Cir. 1993).

6 Id. at 132.

7 Id.

8 Id. at 132‑33.

9 W. Real Estate Equities L.L.C. v. Vill. of Camp Bowie I L.P. (In re Vill. of Camp Bowie I L.P.), 710 F.3d 239 (5th Cir. 2013).

10 Id. at 245.

11 Id.at 245‑46 (citations omitted).

12 Id. at 248.

13 Id.

14 (In re Vill. Green I, GP), 811 F.3d 816 (6th Cir. 2015).

15 On appeal, the district court remanded to the bankruptcy court to determine whether the plan had been proposed in good faith.  The bankruptcy court found that the plan was proposed in good faith and confirmed the plan again. The district court vacated and remanded, which caused the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case and lift the automatic stay, which resulted in the appeal to the Circuit Court.  Id. at 818.

16 Id. at 818‑19.

17 Id. at 819.

18 Id.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Peter C. Blain
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Stites & Harbison PLLC
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Stites & Harbison PLLC
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions