Fed. Circ. Clarifies Scope Of IPR Petitioner

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.

Explore Firm Details

In this article, the authors discuss how the Federal Circuit has provided some clarity on the merits of this PTAB practice and its effect on the estoppel provision.

United States Intellectual Property

In a previous article titled " Recent Decisions Shed Some Light on Scope of AIA Estoppel," Finnegan attorneys Barbara C. McCurdy and Arpita Bhattacharyya discussed how the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) practice of only addressing instituted claims in the final written decision was adding uncertainty to the scope of inter partes review estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e). In this article, the authors discuss how the Federal Circuit has provided some clarity on the merits of this PTAB practice and its effect on the estoppel provision.

Previously published by Law360

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.