United States: Supreme Court Decision Leaves Standing FTC Monopolization Challenge To Exclusive Dealing

A court's inaction is not always worth discussion. But in declining review of the Federal Trade Commission's successful challenge of a manufacturer's exclusive dealing requirement imposed on distributors, the Supreme Court has shown that vertical restraints remain risky, especially for a monopolist. The Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in McWane, Inc. v. FTC, 783 F.3d 814 (11th Cir. 2015), left standing the Eleventh Circuit's decision that had affirmed the FTC finding of liability.

The Supreme Court last addressed the law governing exclusive dealing 55 years ago in Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., 365 U.S. 320 (1961), where it relied on a theory of substantial foreclosure and harm to competitors to analyze an exclusive dealing claim. Since then, antitrust jurisprudence dealing with vertical practices has evolved from an approach based on harm to competitors to an approach that focuses instead on harm to competition.

The Supreme Court declined the opportunity in McWane to revisit the law governing exclusive dealing arrangements and to clarify the quantum of direct and indirect evidence necessary to establish harm to competition from such arrangements. This means that businesses and their legal advisors must look to the court of appeals opinion and its efforts to reconcile evolving antitrust jurisprudence with Supreme Court precedent from a different era.

Background

McWane, Inc. is a manufacturer of iron pipe fittings, which are used to connect water pipes in municipal water supply systems. Today, three suppliers—McWane and importers Star Pipe Products Ltd. and Sigma Corporation—account for approximately 90% of the iron pipe fittings sold domestically, with McWane by far the largest supplier.

In 2009, Congress passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which allocated $6 billion to waterworks projects, but required that the projects use domestically manufactured fittings. At the time, McWane was the only significant manufacturer of domestically-produced fittings. In response to this legislation, Star began contracting with U.S. foundries to manufacture domestic pipe fittings and sell them to U.S. distributors.

McWane in turn implemented its "Full Support Program," which provided that distributors purchasing domestic fittings from McWane's competitors could lose rebates or be cut off from purchasing McWane's domestic fittings for up to three months. McWane's internal document revealed its express purpose in implementing the policy was to raise Star's costs and prevent it from becoming a viable competitor. The policy was effective: the two largest waterworks distributors prohibited their U.S. branches from purchasing domestic fittings from Star. Nevertheless, Star grew its U.S. market share from 5% in 2010 to 10% in 2011, and it was on pace for its best year ever in 2012.

Divided FTC Finds Monopolization

In January 2012, the FTC issued an administrative complaint alleging that McWane's exclusivity mandate constituted unlawful maintenance of a monopoly over the domestically-produced fittings market. In January 2014, a divided Commission ruled that McWane had engaged in unlawful exclusive dealing, which had foreclosed Star's access to U.S. distributors for its domestically-produced fittings and thereby harmed competition. The FTC ordered McWane to cease requiring distributor exclusivity.

Then-Commissioner Joshua Wright dissented. Commissioner Wright emphasized that vertical restraints such as exclusive dealing generally tend to benefit consumers and thus they should be prohibited only in those rare circumstances where there is clear evidence of harm to competition. Although he assumed that McWane was a monopolist in the domestically-produced fittings market, he argued that the exclusive dealing had only harmed Star, but had not resulted in cognizable harm to competition. Commissioner Wright noted that the FTC did not have any direct evidence to show that McWane's policy had increased prices or reduced output in domestically-produced fittings. While McWane did increase its prices after the Full Support Program, evidence indicated Star's presence in various states from 2009 to 2011 did not result in lower prices for domestically-produced fittings, suggesting the exclusion of Star was competitively inconsequential.

Eleventh Circuit Upheld FTC

On appeal from the FTC, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that "substantial evidence" supported the FTC's finding that McWane's exclusive dealing harmed the competitive process and allowed it illegally to maintain its monopoly.

The Eleventh Circuit reasoned that "courts are bound by Tampa Electric's requirement to consider substantial foreclosure" in a rule of reason analysis. While the FTC did not quantify a foreclosure rate, the court was persuaded by the evidence that the two largest distributors, who together controlled approximately 60% of U.S. distribution, prohibited their branches from purchasing from Star. The court rejected McWane's argument that the exclusive dealing arrangement was presumptively legal because it was voluntary, non-binding and short-term.

Further, the Eleventh Circuit found that McWane's exclusive dealing arrangement harmed competition. The court was persuaded by evidence that prices and profit margins for domestic fittings were notably higher than prices for imported fittings, which faced greater competition. McWane argued that the lack of price effects in states where Star entered demonstrated the absence of competitive harm, but the court found this evidence "consistent with a reasonable inference that the Full Support Program significantly contributed to maintaining McWane's monopoly power."

Finally, the Eleventh Circuit held that the clear anticompetitive intent behind the Full Support Program supported the inference that it harmed competition. The court was not persuaded by McWane's asserted procompetitive reasons for the exclusive dealing arrangement (that the Full Support Program was necessary to retain enough sales to keep its domestic foundry afloat and to keep Star from cherrypicking the top few fittings that account for the majority of sales).

McWane petitioned for review by the Supreme Court. McWane's certiorari petition received support from several amici briefs, including from a group of antitrust law professors who argued that "antitrust law should not penalize vertical agreements unless they are shown to harm competition" and expressed concern that the Eleventh Circuit decision could chill beneficial competition and have adverse effects for consumer welfare. Despite this support, the Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari.

Implications

The tension between the precedent established by the Eleventh Circuit in McWane and Commissioner Wright's position centers on the evidence needed to establish that an exclusive dealing arrangement is likely to harm competition. Commissioner Wright argued that there must be direct evidence establishing a negative impact on price or output to link the harm to a competitor with harm to competition more generally, a link that he found lacking in this case. The Eleventh Circuit disagreed, finding that the government met its burden by providing substantial evidence that McWane "engaged in anticompetitive conduct that reasonably appears to significantly contribute to maintaining monopoly power." The Eleventh Circuit found direct evidentiary support from McWane's ability to raise its own prices. The Eleventh Circuit rejected McWane's argument that the government did not adequately prove that the Full Support Program was responsible for McWane's decision to raise prices, a position echoed in Commissioner Wright's dissent, because it "demands too high a bar for causation." This deferential approach provides the FTC and private litigants with greater latitude in challenging exclusive dealing arrangements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
J. Bruce McDonald
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions