United States: What The Founders Would Say About iPhone Unlock Case

In a criminal investigation, if important information were behind a locked vault and the vault manufacturer had a master key to access the vault, the government would be on solid grounds to request this master key. But what if no master key existed? What if the vault was built and sold to preclude the existence of a master key? Can the government conscript the manufacturer to develop a master key where none exists, to invent something novel, thereby compromising the security of all owners of the vault? This is essentially the question a magistrate judge in California is grappling with in the wake of the San Bernardino mass shooting.

The government seeks to access the iPhone of the deceased attacker through use of a 227-year-old law, the All Writs Act. The government claims that this statute authorizes an order forcing Apple Inc. to create software that does not currently exist and that would effectively be a master key to access any iPhone — this is an order that no court has ever authorized in 227 years under this law. How? To justify this proposed order, the government claims that conscripting Apple to create a master key is the same as requesting a key already in existence. Such a conclusion is not just a stretch, it is illogical, particularly in light of the history of the All Writs Act.

The government posits that government agents should always be guaranteed access to any type of information, but these claims are also wildly inconsistent with the history in which the statute was passed, and there is a long history in the United States of technology securing information, even against the government. To allow the government's interpretation of the All Writs Act would require completely disregarding the context in which it was passed.

Writs of Assistance and All Writs Act

The All Writs Act was enacted as part of the Judiciary Act in the First Congress of the new United States. It was enacted into law on Sept. 24, 1789, the day before the Fourth Amendment was approved by Congress. Like many statutes in the founding era, the All Writs Act was passed in the context of the pre-existing legal system under Great Britain, where court orders were referred to as "writs of assistance." Understanding these "writs of assistance" is important, because as the U.S. Supreme Court has held, the Fourth Amendment was "most immediately the product of contemporary revulsion against a regime of writs of assistance."

Writs of assistance, more commonly called "writs of aid," were a written order, a writ, issued by a court. Using "writs of assistance," the king would authorize wide-ranging searches of anyone, anywhere, and anytime without being suspected of a crime. "A writ," as Hiller Zobel explains, was "a command to an officer in the name of the sovereign." Writs of assistance "could be used to enlist the aid of any officer of the crown in conducting a search of a dwelling, shop or warehouse for smuggled goods."

In 1761, a young John Adams would sit in a Boston court as James Otis argued against writs of assistance authorizing arbitrary search and seizure practices. John Adams would take notes of the argument and wrote an extended "abstract" of the case. Otis was unequivocal in limiting the powers of writs, as he referred to limitless writs as "the worst instrument of arbitrary power." John Adams would write, "Then and there was the first scene of the first act of opposition to the arbitrary claims of Great Britain. Then and there the child Independence was born. In fifteen years, namely in 1776, he grew up to manhood, and declared himself free." Otis' argument has often been cited by the Supreme Court as reflecting the framers' intent. These "hated writs" directly motivated James Madison's crafting of the Fourth Amendment and were on the minds of the founders as they enacted the All Writs Act.

To sustain the government's reading of the All Writs Act today, we must assume that the same week that Congress was passing the Fourth Amendment to limit the executive branch's power to obtain unlimited writs for search and seizure from the courts, Congress passed a simple two-line bill designed to grant courts nearly unfettered discretion to issue writs in violation of our liberty. Such a reading is even more contorted and indefensible in light of an originalist understanding of the Ninth Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the Privileges or Immunities Clause of Article V protecting essential liberties from government intrusion.

The end result of the government's argument today would be, effectively, to make it impossible for companies to make secure digital devices; if companies are required to work to undermine their own security, or build in backdoors by design, then secure digital devices are impossible. This outcome must be viewed as inconsistent with the goals of the legislators who wrote the All Writs Act in 1789.

Securing Information Isn't New

While the Congress of 1789 didn't have digital devices, it did have long experience with physical locks. While today, most locks are not viewed as a serious impediment to law enforcement because of the ease of accessing such locks through modern technology, in the 1780s there were physical locks that were not accessible to law enforcement.

In 1785, Joseph Bramah developed the "Bramah safety lock," which was unpickable. Bramah would establish a contest where he offered 200 guineas to the first "artist" who could make an instrument that picked the lock. Later the Bramah lock was joined by the Chubb lock, another unpickable lock. At one point, one state even offered a convicted burglar parole if he could break the Chubb lock.

The "All Writs Act" was passed in 1789, at a time when the top locks were unpickable to anyone. Anything behind these locks was potentially off limits to law enforcement. The Bramah lock was eventually picked in 1851. Yet over that 66-year history, no court appears to have ordered Chubb or Bramah to try to defeat their own security mechanism, despite the fact that, like Apple today, Chubb and Bramah were best positioned to find vulnerabilities in their own locked devices. In the Farook case, the government argues that its requested extraordinary measure is needed in part because of the danger of the data self-destructing through more than 10 password attempts, but the Chubb and Bramah locks also had self-destruct features of a sort.

Conclusion

James Otis argued that the writs of assistance were "the most destructive of English liberty and the fundamental principles of law, that ever was found in an English law-book." Otis referred to the practice of writs that were universal, directed "to all," as enabling "a tyrant in a legal manner."

Today, as the government is requesting that a company be conscripted against its will to create a master key, we should keep in mind the caution of James Otis, an important founding father. What is to stop the government from further intrusions upon our liberty?

What is to stop the government, through use of a court order, from acting as a "tyrant in a legal manner"? If ordering a company to hack into its own products and imperil the liberty and safety of its consumers does not count as an abuse of such writs, then what would? While the government sees no difference in ordering individuals to turn over records or master keys already in existence versus conscripting individuals or companies to create a master key against their will, surely the founders would have.

Originally published in Law360 on March 23, 2016.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
25 Sep 2018, Conference, California, United States

We're excited to introduce Women's IP Strategy, a 2-day conference that tackles both the IP, legal as well as broader career development obstacles, risks and rewards for women lawyers working in male-dominant industries.

2 Oct 2018, Webinar, California, United States

This CLE webinar will offer suggestions to litigators to help them comply with the new GDPR during e-discovery.

10 Oct 2018, Webinar, California, United States

For the past years, 3D printing has significantly revolutionized the business industry as it provides innovations and improvement to pre-existing processes.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions