United States: Vardanyan V. AMCO INS. Co.

(Error to Instruct the Jury that a Property Loss Must Be Caused by a Specifically Listed Peril, and Only a Specifically Listed Peril, to Find Coverage)

In Vardanyan v. AMCO Insurance Company, 243 Cal. App. 4th 779 (2015), the Court of Appeal reversed and remanded for retrial the plaintiff's causes of action for breach of contract and bad faith, except for plaintiff's punitive damages claim.

Plaintiff owned a rental house, insured by the defendant. In 2010, plaintiff submitted a claim to defendant for water damage and mold. Defendant sent an adjuster to inspect the following day, who noted that the house seemed to be settling, possibly due to a water leak. Plaintiff informed the adjuster the tenants had told him of the damage a few months before, and he waited to report the claim until they moved out. At the adjuster's recommendation, an engineer inspected the home. The engineer's report found multiple leaks in the roof, gutters in disrepair, and downspouts that deposited water at the base of the home's walls, but which had come disconnected. There was also evidence of a faucet or hose spraying the wall for a significant length of time; a toilet and bathtub were both leaking; and the floor beneath the bathtub had sunk two and a half inches. One of the bedrooms had a depression in the floor, measuring eight inches deep and five to six feet across; there was also water damage to a closet, the kitchen, a utility room, and the living room (where the floor was separating from the wall). There was evidence of past termite infestation. The engineer opined that the home suffered from faulty construction, and the damage was caused by water leaks, contributed to by the poor construction, termite damage, and decay.

The defendant denied plaintiff's claim, citing multiple policy exclusions. Plaintiff retained a public adjuster, then filed suit against the defendant, alleging breach of contract and bad faith. Plaintiff claimed the policy provided coverage for the damage as collapse. Both sides presented evidence as to the causes of the loss — and both indicated there were multiple causes of the loss. Plaintiff requested a jury instruction regarding the efficient proximate cause doctrine, and defendant requested an instruction placing on plaintiff the burden to prove that only covered causes of loss caused the damage, and there would be no coverage if the cause was other than one listed in the policy. When the trial court indicated its intention to give defendant's proposed instruction, plaintiff indicated this instruction was tantamount to a directed verdict for defendant because there was no dispute that there were additional causes of the loss other than those listed in the policy. Defendant moved for a directed verdict, which the trial court granted and from which plaintiff appealed.

The policy provided that it would cover direct physical loss except for collapse "other than as provided in Other Coverage 9." Other Coverage 9 provided coverage for collapse "caused only by one or more of the following," which included hidden decay; hidden insect or vermin damage; weight of contents, equipment, animals or people; weight of rain which collects on a roof; and use of defective material or methods in construction. The policy also contained exclusions for earth movement, water damage, neglect, faulty workmanship, and faulty maintenance. Plaintiff asserted the policy provided coverage for the loss as collapse caused by hidden decay and hidden insect damage.

The Court determined the efficient proximate cause doctrine applies to resolve questions of coverage where a loss is caused by multiple risks, when at least one is covered by the policy and others are not. The Court quoted Sabella v. Wisler, 59 Cal. 2d 21 (1963) for the proposition that: "In determining whether a loss is within an exception in a policy, where there is a concurrence of different causes, the efficient cause—the one that sets others in motion—is the cause to which the loss should be attributed, though the other causes may follow it, and operate more immediately in producing the disaster." The Court noted "an insurer cannot contract around the efficient proximate cause doctrine to give broader effect to its policy exclusions."

Plaintiff contended that the policy provides coverage if the predominate cause of the loss is a peril listed in Other Coverage 9. Defendant contended the use of "only" in Other Coverage 9 means the loss is covered if and only if a covered loss — and no other peril — contributes to the loss. The trial court agreed with the defendant, that plaintiff would need to establish that only a covered cause of loss contributed to the loss. The Court noted that a similar argument had been rejected in Julian v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co., 35 Cal. 4th 747 (2007), where the court was concerned that insurers would attempt to contract out of the efficient proximate cause doctrine. Relying on the principle that insurance provisions are to be interpreted as a reasonable insured would understand them, the Court rejected the defendant's interpretation, finding a reasonable insured would understand the policy to provide coverage where the predominant cause is covered under the policy:

We conclude plaintiff's interpretation of the Other Coverage 9 provision is the correct interpretation, consistent with the efficient proximate cause doctrine. A policy cannot extend coverage for a specified peril, then exclude coverage for a loss caused by a combination of the covered peril and an excluded peril, without regard to whether the covered peril was the predominant or efficient proximate cause of the loss. Other Coverage 9 identifies the perils that are covered when the loss involves collapse. If any other peril contributes to the loss, whether the loss is covered or excluded depends upon which peril is the predominant cause of the loss. To the extent the term "caused only by one or more" of the listed perils can be construed to mean the contribution of any unlisted peril, in any way and to any degree, would result in the loss being excluded from coverage, the provision is an unenforceable attempt to contract around the efficient proximate cause doctrine.

The Court determined the trial court should have used CACI No. 2306, as requested by the plaintiff, rather than defendant's special instruction. The Court also agreed with plaintiff that defendant's special instruction improperly placed the burden of proof regarding the Other Coverage provision on plaintiff, rather than on defendant. While the insured must prove facts to establish that the loss falls within the policy's insuring provisions, the insurer then must bear the burden to prove that the loss is specifically excluded.

[The following summarizes unpublished portions of the Court's decision.]

Finally, plaintiff asserted that the reversal and remand also required a reversal and remand on his punitive damages claim. Initially, the Court noted that it could order a retrial of some issues, while declining to do so for others. Plaintiff had a full and fair opportunity to present evidence in support of the punitive damages claim. After hearing the evidence, the trial court concluded there was insufficient evidence from which the jury could find malice, oppression or fraud. The Court reviewed the evidence presented by plaintiff to determine (1) whether the claim representative and/or her manager could be considered "managing agents," and (2) whether their actions could satisfy the clear and convincing standard for punitive damages. The Court ultimately concluded that, while the claim process may have included some improprieties, it "does not rise to the level of reprehensibility necessary to support an award of punitive damages," therefore, "there is no evidence of sufficient substantiality to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on his claim for punitive damages."

Finally, the Court then addressed defendant's request to review the denial of motions in limine and special jury instructions, assertedly for guidance upon retrial. The Court determined:

It is appropriate for the reviewing court to address an issue that is not necessary to resolution of the appeal when the issue is fully argued by the parties in their briefs on appeal, the court decides the appeal on a ground that does not require a ruling on that issue, but it is clear from the discussion before the reviewing court that the issue is likely to require resolution on retrial.

The Court noted that both of the issues raised by defendant were "beyond the scope of the issues raised by plaintiff's appeal" and were not briefed by plaintiff for the appeal. The Court "decline[d] to roam so far afield from the issues actually presented by plaintiff's appeal challenging the bases for the directed verdicts."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions