United States: Federal Circuit: Lanham Act's Prohibition On Registration Of Disparaging Marks Is Unconstitutional

In re Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

The Federal Circuit recently held that Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, that, among other restrictions, prohibits the registration of trademarks that "may disparage . . . persons, living or dead," violates the First Amendment because it constitutes viewpoint discrimination on the part of the government. This ruling conflicts with a recent decision by a Virginia district court upholding the cancellation of the Redskins' trademark on the grounds that it disparages Native Americans. Pro-Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse et al., 112 F.Supp.3d 439 (E.D. Va. 2015). That ruling is currently on appeal to the Fourth Circuit, potentially resulting in a circuit split that would be ripe for Supreme Court review.

In re Tam concerns the Asian American band The Slants' appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office's ("USPTO") refusal to register its mark THE SLANTS on the basis that the mark disparages Asians. To determine whether a mark is disparaging under Section 2(a), a trademark examiner considers: (i) the likely meaning of the matter in question, and (ii) if the meaning is found to refer to identifiable persons, institutions, beliefs or national symbols, whether that meaning may be disparaging to a substantial composite of the referenced group. In this case, the trademark examiner found that THE SLANTS clearly referred to people of Asian descent and would be understood by a substantial composite of that group as an ethnic slur referring to the eye shape of many people of Asian descent. The trademark examiner therefore denied registration, and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirmed, pointing to, among other things, dictionary definitions, the band's website, which used the name alongside a stereotypical image of an Asian woman, and record evidence of individuals and groups in the Asian community objecting to Mr. Tam's use of the word.

In his appeal to the Federal Circuit, the band's founder and bassist, Simon Shiao Tam, argued that he chose the name "The Slants" in order to reclaim a word that was historically used as an ethnic stereotype or slur; thus, he argued, the use of the term "The Slants" by an Asian American band as a way to undermine and take ownership of a historically derogatory term constituted political speech. By refusing to register the mark, the government was discriminating against him based on his expressive speech in violation of the First Amendment. The Federal Circuit initially affirmed the USPTO's refusal to register the mark, but then sua sponte ordered a rehearing en banc, after which it reversed its prior decision.

In finding Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act unconstitutional, the Federal Circuit reasoned that the provision is subject to, and fails, strict scrutiny. Strict scrutiny is used to review any governmental regulation that burdens private speech based on the content or viewpoint expressed. In this case, the Federal Circuit found it undeniable that Section 2(a) discriminates on the basis of the viewpoint expressed by the mark: "The PTO looks at what message the referenced group takes from the applicant's mark in the context of the applicant's use, and it denies registration only if the message received is a negative one." 808 F.3d at 1337.

The Federal Circuit rejected the argument that strict scrutiny does not apply to review of Section 2(a) because it regulates commercial rather than expressive speech. It found that marks often have an expressive component over and above their commercial-speech aspect, and that it is the expressive component of the mark that Section 2(a) targets.

The Federal Circuit also rejected the government's arguments that (i) the First Amendment is not implicated because Section 2(a) does not prevent use of the mark, but only registration, an argument upheld by an earlier Federal Circuit decision, In re McGinley, 660 F.2d 481 (C.C.P.A. 1981); (ii) trademark registrations are government speech; and (iii) trademark registration constitutes a government subsidy and so may be guided by the government's point of view.

Regarding the argument that the First Amendment does not apply because an applicant may use a mark irrespective of registration, the court found that trademark registration confers real benefits on mark holders, and thus denial of a registration on the basis of the message expressed has a chilling effect on speech. In so holding, it abrogated In re McGinley.

The Federal Circuit then rejected the argument that trademark registration is government speech, finding instead that trademark registration merely regulates private speech—it is not the government speaking for itself. Otherwise, the court argued, copyright registration also would constitute government speech, and the government could refuse to issue registrations to artistic works or books whose subject matter it found distasteful. The court also distinguished the recent Supreme Court decision in Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 2239 (2015), in which the Court found that specialty license plates constituted government speech, such that Texas could constitutionally refuse to issue a specialty license plate featuring a confederate flag. According to the Federal Circuit, unlike license plates which have the name of the state emblazoned across the top, and whose use is governed by numerous state laws, private trademarks are in no way associated with the government.

Finally, the Federal Circuit determined that Section 2(a) is not a government subsidy exempt from strict scrutiny. It found that although the government may use the Spending Clause to disseminate or support a particular message through funding recipients, trademark registration does not constitute such a program. In support of that finding, the court pointed out that Congress's power to regulate trademarks arises under the Commerce Clause, not the Spending Clause. Were the court to accept the government's argument, it reasoned, the subsidy exception would apply to virtually all government regulation and thus thwart important First Amendment protections. Moreover, the court pointed out, Section 2(a) actually undermines the purpose of the Lanham Act, which is to prevent consumer confusion and protect the goodwill of trademark owners; because Section 2(a) permits cancellation of a mark decades after its registration, it has the potential to undermine rather than protect a trademark owner's investment in its mark.

The en banc opinions in In re Tam included several concurrences and a dissent. Two judges argued in a concurrence that Section 2(a) is unconstitutionally vague given the subjective nature of the term "disparaging." Several others concurred in part and dissented in part, arguing that Section 2(a)'s ban on registration of disparaging marks is unconstitutional as applied to Mr. Tam because his mark was expressive, but that the majority erred by finding the provision to be facially unconstitutional as applied to purely commercial speech. One of these judges also argued in support of the holding in In re McGinley, reasoning that the expressive aspect of the applicant's speech is not burdened because the applicant can continue to use the mark as it wishes in commerce. The sole dissenting judge argued that trademarks are commercial speech and thus intermediate scrutiny, not strict scrutiny, should apply to laws regulating their use. The dissent concluded that Section 2(a) should survive such review because it advances the government's interest in the orderly flow of commerce: "Commerce does not benefit from political volatility, nor from insults, discrimination, or bigotry." 808 F.3d 1380. To support this argument, the dissent pointed to several other laws that also ban derogatory speech in commercial settings, such as those that ban discriminatory job advertisements and harassing speech in the workplace. Thus, the dissent concluded that avoiding commercial disruption is a legitimate government interest that justifies any modest burden that refusal to register a mark may place on speech.

Following the Federal Circuit's decision, the USPTO issued a statement that under the Circuit court's ruling, other provisions of Section 2(a) that prohibit the registration of "immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter" would likewise be unconstitutional. It is unclear how the USPTO will deal with applications involving refusals to register on the basis of immoral, deceptive, scandalous, or disparaging matter while the appeals in In re Tam and Blackhorse play out.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.