United States: Developments Under The Displaced Building Service Worker Protection Act

Last Updated: April 19 2016
Article by Jerrold F. Goldberg

The New York City Displaced Building Service Worker Protection Act (DBSWA), NYC Administrative Code §22-505 (DBSWA or the Act), which was signed into law in November 2002, significantly changed the landscape in connection with labor and employment issues upon sales or transfers of real property in New York City, or changes in building service contractors.

While before the Act's enactment, purchasers or replacement managing agents or contractors could not refuse to hire persons because of their union status or to avoid union obligations, purchasers and replacement contractors had no statutory obligation1to offer to hire a predecessor's employees, and thus there was no presumptive continuance of representation of the employees by the predecessor's union.

The DBSWA requires that any buyer, transferee, or successor employer of most New York City commercial and residential properties offer the incumbent employees jobs after the change in ownership or change in employer for as many jobs as the new employer will have at the property,2 and to keep those employees in employ for at least 90 days unless it has cause for discharge during that "probationary" period. However, it is important to note that the law does not require a buyer or new employer to maintain the existing terms and conditions of employment (e.g., wage rates, benefits, seniority), nor to assume an existing collective bargaining agreement.

The law itself excludes: (1) commercial office buildings of less than 100,000 square feet, (2) residential buildings with fewer than 50 units, and (3) any building in which New York City or any New York City governmental agency occupies 50 percent or more of the rentable square footage. The statute defines "building service employees," that is, those protected by the law, to include janitorial and security employees but not engineering employees, and excludes any person being paid more than $25 per hour, persons working fewer than eight hours per week at the building and persons who have been employed in the building for less than three months.3

This law, although applicable in both union and nonunion properties, was strongly supported during the enactment process by Local 32BJ, Service Employees International Union (Local 32BJ), which represents a large number of employees at such properties in New York City. Although not limited to union buildings, or to those whose employees who are represented by Local 32BJ, the law generally was considered to have the effect of keeping Local 32BJ in place when a building changed ownership or control, or there was a change in the contractor providing building services, because under federal labor law's so-called "successorship" doctrine, if a majority of the workforce of a successor employer is composed of employees of the predecessor, there is a legal presumption that those employees still wish to be represented by the incumbent union.

New York City is not the only jurisdiction to have such a law in the building service industry. The first such law was passed in Washington, D.C. in 1994. There are now similar laws in a number of counties and cities, such as: Westchester County, N.Y.; Montgomery County, Md.; Philadelphia, Pa.; Providence, R.I.; St. Louis, Mo.; and Los Angeles and San Francisco, Calif., among others. The laws vary in applicability in regard to those protected in terms of length of employment, size, and nature of the building and particular wage levels and scheduled hours.

Two of these statutes were challenged on the basis of federal preemption. Specifically, employers urged that laws requiring that employers maintain a predecessor's workforce were preempted by federal laws providing that "successorship" obligations should be left to the free play of market forces. As stated above, under federal labor law, if a majority of a successor employer's workforce is composed of persons who worked for the predecessor, there is a legal presumption that the union which represented the predecessor's employees remains the collective bargaining representative of the successor's employees. Both the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, reviewing the D.C. law, and the First Circuit Court of Appeals, reviewing the Providence, R.I. statute,4 rejected the preemption arguments and upheld the statutes. See Washington Service Contractors Coalition v. District of Columbia, 54 F.3d 811 (D.C. Cir. 1995)and Rhode Island Hospitality Association v. City of Providence, 667 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2011).

The New York City DBSWPA was challenged on preemption grounds in 2004 in Alcantara v. Allied Properties, 334 F. Supp.2d 336 (E.D.N.Y. 2004). InAlcantara, a number of employees sued in New York state court5to enforce their right to be offered continued employment under the DBSWPA when the residential buildings in which they were employed were sold and the purchaser failed to offer them employment. The building owner removed the case to federal court, but the federal court, while expressing some concerns about preemption, remanded the case to state court. The state court later rejected the preemption arguments, and held that the purchasers had violated the law. However, given that the 90-day probationary period had passed, the court did not order reinstatement of the employees.

More recently, employers have challenged not the DBSWPA itself, but the impact that the statute has in determining a union's continued representation status with a successor employer. As indicated above, the statute requires a successor employer (whether a building purchaser or replacement manager or contractor) to offer employment to the incumbent employees. Given that federal labor law deems as a "successor" with a duty to bargain with the predecessor's union any employer a majority of whose workforce is composed of the predecessor employees, the New York City law would seem to guarantee such a finding of successorship.6However, in several recent cases, employers have argued (with mixed results, as discussed below) that no successorship finding can be made until the 91st day after the closing or change in employer, inasmuch as the employer did not "voluntarily" or "consciously" choose to retain a majority until the 90-day probationary period ended.

In Paulsen v. GVS Properties, 904 F. Supp. 2d 282 (E.D.N.Y. 2012), a U.S. district judge in the Eastern District of New York denied a request for injunctive relief sought by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) seeking to compel a buyer to recognize the incumbent union (not Local 32BJ), holding that, because hiring pursuant to the DBSWA is not "voluntary" but mandatory, and that the federal labor law "successorship" doctrine is based on "voluntary" hiring of a majority by the successor, the fact that a buyer hired the seller's contractor's employees did not require the buyer to recognize and bargain with the union until the buyer made hiring decisions after the 90-day probationary period. Because the buyer's workforce of eight employees after 90 days included only four of the seller's contractor's employees, there was no majority and the judge denied the NLRB's request for a preliminary injunction.

Nonetheless, the NLRB proceeded with a hearing on the merits. Contrary to the District Court, the NLRB found that GVS (the buyer)wasa successor employer.GVS Properties, 362 NLRB No. 194 (Aug. 27, 2015). The Board ruled that by complying with the New York City DBSWPA, the buyer made a "conscious decision" to be a "perfectly clear" successor obligated to bargain with the incumbent union.7 GVS has appealed the NLRB's decision to the District of Columbia Circuit.

Interestingly though, counsel for the general counsel of the NLRB conceded on two occasions prior to the Board's decision in GVS that majority status cannot be determined until the 91st day. InM&M Parkside Towers (Local 670, Retail Wholesale and Dept. Store Union), 2007 WL 313429. (Jan. 30, 2007), an NLRB administrative law judge held that the general counsel of the NLRB had conceded that under the DBSWPA, successorship cannot be determined until the employees are offered permanent employment after the 90-day probationary period or until a reasonable time after the 90 days. InNovel Service Group, (Local 32BJ SEIU), 02-CA-113834 and 02-CA-11838602 (Jan. 15, 2015), an ALJ also ruled that majority status (and thus the successorship obligation to bargain) can only be determined after the 90-day period has expired. It is of course highly possible that the general counsel will retreat from this position in light of the Board's decision inGVS.

In November 2015, the New York City Council's Committee on Civil Service and Labor began consideration of a bill to amend the DBSWPA so as to extend its coverage. Intro. No. 1004-2015. The most significant change would be having the law apply to commercial tenants with 10,000 square feet or more who employ building service employees. Further it would enlarge the remedies available in the event of a violation (the present law provides only for reinstatement and backpay) so as to provide for "double damages" (double back pay). Finally the amendment would eliminate the exemption for City and City agency occupied buildings, and also eliminate the exclusion of workers making more than $25 per hour (given that most union cleaners will approach or exceed the $25 per hour rate in the next several years). The bill is currently pending consideration.


1 Purchasers of real property could,by contract, agree to assume a seller's labor agreement, and/or offer to hire the incumbent building service employees. However, there was no statutory obligation for purchasers to do so.

2 To the extent that the new employer will staff the building with fewer employees, offers must be made in order of length of service in each classification.

3 The City Council has proposed a bill to eliminate the exclusion for New York City/City agency occupied buildings and the $25 per hour cap. See infra.

4 The Providence law at issue in the case applied specifically to hospitality industry properties.

5 The employer thereafter also filed an unfair labor practice charge alleging that the suit itself violated §8(b) of the Act. The charge was dismissed upon advice of the NLRB's General Counsel, Advice Memo, Case No. 29-CB-12639, Oct. 14, 2004.

6 After the law was passed, and since that time, employers have tried to avoid the applicability of the law by offering minimal wages and benefits in the hopes that employees would reject positions even if offered, or by offering severance packages to induce employees to leave employment prior to the closing or change in employer. However, at least in unionized buildings, this strategy has had minimal impact primarily because the incumbent union must be given 15 days' notice of the closing or change in contractor, and has utilized that time to persuade employees not to be induced to leave the job under these circumstances.

7 In dicta the Board suggested that a buyer/new employer could avoid a finding of "perfectly clear" successorship, even under the New York City law, by announcing its intent to establish new and different terms and conditions of employment before or simultaneously with its offer to employ the existing workers in compliance with the DBSWPA.

Originally published February 29, 2016 - New York Law Journal

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.