ARTICLE
30 March 2016

Is Final Rule On White Collar Exemptions A Hidden Opportunity For Employers?

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
It is no secret that last summer the Department of Labor (DOL) proposed substantial amendments to the white collar exemption regulations.
United States Employment and HR

It is no secret that last summer the Department of Labor (DOL) proposed substantial amendments to the white collar exemption regulations. Namely, the DOL proposed raising the minimum salary threshold from $23,660 to $50,440 and to automatically increase the salary threshold on an annual basis based on inflation or other factors. Well, the amended rules are expected to be published soon – just last week, the DOL sent the proposed final rules to the White House Office of Management and Budget for final review. Last month, the DOL Solicitor of Labor M. Patricia Smith stated the amended rules would be finalized in July 2016 and the effective date would be within 60 days thereafter, and the recent transmission of those rules to OMB means that timetable is likely to be met and even potentially exceeded. Many employers may be looking at this as terrible news.

However, if you are a "glass half full" person, the publication of the final rules may provide a hidden opportunity for employers to reclassify some positions that may have changed over the years and may no longer qualify for an exemption – particularly as the scrutiny on exempt classifications has increased. Reclassifying an employee from exempt to non-exempt can always be risky because it may raise suspicion that the position never should have been classified as exempt in the first place. However, the implementation of new overtime rules likely will require the reclassification of a great number of positions for a variety of employers, including positions that currently clearly satisfy the duties tests for the applicable exemption. Because much reclassification will occur, reclassifying positions (even if the reclassification has nothing to do with the different requirements under the amended rules) may not raise the same kinds of suspicions it would if done in a different time period.

Therefore, the next couple of months may be a great time to reevaluate job classifications with the plan to reclassify, as needed, when the amended rules are finalized. If you do choose to reevaluate/reclassify job positions, keep the following in mind:

  • In contrast to audits conducted by outside attorneys, job classification audits by consultants (non-attorneys), including communications and reports, are generally not privileged.
  • Focus on the job duties actually performed, not the duties listed on the job description.
  • To help accomplish the foregoing, consider updating job descriptions at same time to reflect actual duties performed.
  • If you do reclassify positions, directly reference the DOL amended rules when communicating the change in classification to the employee in order to dispel suspicion. For instance, "the DOL changed the requirements for certain exemptions. Those changes are suspected to result in many jobs being changed from exempt to non-exempt. Due to those new requirements the employer evaluated certain positions and, as a result, is changing the employee's classification."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More