United States: Retaining Neutral Accounting Experts In M&A Working Capital Disputes

Last Updated: March 24 2016
Article by Stephen M. Fields

A typical provision in a purchase and sale agreement requires the buyer, post-closing, to provide a "true-up" of the target's net working capital agreed upon by the parties at closing. If the seller disagrees with the contents of the true-up (items or amounts) it is normally required to send the buyer a Notice of Objection to such calculation and, if the parties cannot thereafter amicably resolve their differences, such dispute is typically referred to an accounting firm designated in the purchase agreement as an independent expert to render a "final, conclusive and binding" decision resolving such dispute.

What is involved in retaining the independent expert? First, note that this is a joint retention by buyer and seller. So, notwithstanding that a certain Big 4 or other accounting firm has been designated to so act in the purchase agreement, the parties, unless otherwise specified, have the ability to agree, or not, to the terms set forth in the engagement letter as proposed by the independent expert. Thus, each side has leverage to either expedite, delay or derail the arbitration process and thwart the original selection of the independent expert. Such tactics can take the form of objecting to the terms of the engagement letter or to the selection of the individuals at the accounting firm proposed to make the final determination. Second, the parties must agree upon the terms of the independent expert's engagement. The standard independent expert engagement letter usually contains two attachments: Attachment "A," which typically sets forth three columns, i.e., "Items in Dispute," "Buyer's Position" and "Seller's Position," and Attachment B, which sets forth timeframes and events. When the decision letter is ultimately rendered by the independent expert at the end of this process, a fourth column will be added by the independent expert which will reflect such final determination and either increase or decrease the target working capital established by the parties at closing. Notwithstanding the contents of the true-up and the Notice of Objection, the parties usually have the ability to mutually add additional items and amounts in dispute to Attachment "A." Often, the parties cannot agree as to the characterization of the items in dispute. Some independent experts allow the conflicting points of view to each be set forth in the applicable "Items in Dispute" column. Others refuse to act until the parties are in agreement.

One item in dispute that often generates considerable controversy is whether the refund to the seller of taxes with respect to pre-closing periods and loss carrybacks not yet received should be determined and/or paid only after the buyer receives same from the IRS, or whether an estimate of such refund should be included in the working capital calculation determined by the independent expert. The standard net working capital adjustment provision in most purchase agreements provides that any such refunds received by the buyer post-closing must be transmitted to the seller only upon receipt thereof by the buyer from the IRS. As we all know, waiting for the IRS to act could result in a significant delay in the seller receiving such payment. That language, however, by itself, is not necessarily dispositive as to the timing of transmission of refunds because typical purchase agreements also provide that the parties can, if they so desire, treat such refunds as part of the working capital computation. That would allow the independent expert to include such refunds within its final determination, if they are based upon reasonable estimates, which is what GAAP requires in order to do so.

To illustrate the point, in a recent dispute the independent expert stated that GAAP requires tax assets to be recognized in the period when it is more likely than not that an entity is entitled to the economic benefits of those tax assets. So, for example, if transaction bonuses in a leveraged buyout are payable and become a liability and an expense at the time of closing, then the related benefits of the net operating loss (NOL) tax asset created by the transaction bonuses also become more likely than not and should be recognized at the time of closing. As a result, such NOL tax asset was determined by the independent expert to be included in the working capital computation at the time of closing and the payment thereof was not required to be held in abeyance pending the buyer's receipt of the refund from IRS.

Many purchase agreements are silent on when tax refunds shall be payable, or leave it to the parties to mutually agree. If sellers wish to expedite matters, they should negotiate for the independent expert to award such refunds as part of its mandate in the absence and in advance of remittance from IRS. This will allow the seller to expeditiously receive these refunds absent being subject to intentional or other delays caused by tardy filing by the buyer of amended tax returns seeking such refunds. Including this item in the appropriate column of Attachment "A" to the engagement letter should be helpful in conferring such authority upon the independent expert even if the purchase agreement is silent or permissive (but not mandatory) with respect to the scope of authority so granted to the accounting firm so engaged. An interesting question arises as to what the disposition should be if, when the ultimate IRS refund is received years later, such refund is in an amount significantly different than the "reasonable" estimate upon which the independent expert rendered its working capital decision. That discussion is beyond the scope of this article.

As noted above, Attachment "B" to the independent expert engagement letter usually sets forth a schedule of events and time frames which the parties are required to adhere to. The first meaningful event is the submission of each party's "Statement of Position" to the independent expert. When each side has submitted its Statement of Position, the independent expert provides copies thereof to the opponent and time is then provided for each party to reply to the other party's "Statement of Position." The independent expert typically reserves the right, during specified time periods, to send interrogatories to one or both parties requesting a written response thereto within additional time frames. A frequently asked question from the independent expert might be: "If there is a conflict between GAAP and the Purchase Agreement, which shall govern?" Answering that question is not always simple when the purchase agreement says its accounting terms are governed by US GAAP, consistently applied. Failing to receive responsive, satisfactory or clarifying answers, the independent expert may issue supplemental interrogatories or, in some cases, request a telephone conference or, rarely, in-person meetings with both sides. Depending upon the wishes of the parties as reflected in the content of the engagement letter itself, the independent expert may be asked to render a long form reasoned decision or a short form conclusion-oriented decision. In either case the engagement letter generally provides that either party may only contest arithmetical calculations, and all additional substantive arguments and materials received after the initial decision letter is issued will be disregarded or discarded. Note that the decision of the independent expert will not generally award interest, attorney fees or other costs unless specifically articulated in the purchase agreement. Given the paucity of precedent in this area, the best practice is probably to also provide for recovery of such items in the engagement letter if that is what is intended.

How is the independent expert's determination enforced? Once the engagement letter is executed, the independent expert should be the final authority as to matters within its purview. Courts and arbitration panels such as the American Arbitration Association appear to have given deference to the decisions of these independent experts absent fraud or conflicts of interest, the latter of which is usually initially addressed in the engagement letter. However, even though the decision letter is "final, binding and conclusive," the quoted language by itself may or may not be sufficient to confirm the working capital decision of the independent expert so as to have a judgment entered thereon similar to the confirmation and entering of a judgment based upon a commercial arbitrator's award. Litigators generally recommend that the parties add language to the purchase agreement and the independent expert's engagement letter to the effect that such award may be entered and reduced to judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction so as to enable the prevailing party to enforce the terms thereof if payment is not made when required. The terms of the typical independent expert's engagement letter are required by the independent expert to be "confidential," so any public disclosure thereof, even converting the award to a judgment which is publicly filed, may require a carve-out to the terms of such letter.

What strategic considerations should parties to working capital disputes be mindful? Given the above process, which is the modus operandi of the Big 4 accounting firms, several questions arise in how to strategically position the arguments on both sides. First, will the independent expert review the true-up and the "Notice of Objection" or only the Statements of Position and replies? If so, how detailed should those documents be? Do the parties want to state their full positions in the true-up and Notice of Objection documents, or, should they save some ammunition for the Statements of Position in the event no resolution can be achieved before having to utilize the services of the independent expert?

Other issues related to the net working capital adjustment may also arise that are outside the purview of the independent expert. For example, what happens if the buyer delivers its true-up significantly later than required under the terms of the purchase agreement? Or, what happens if one party refuses to agree to the terms of the engagement letter? The independent expert cannot resolve these issues because it has not been engaged to do so, and thus the parties will be relegated to the other dispute mechanisms set forth in the purchase agreement.

One thing is for certain. No careful lawyer or private equity executive should go down this dispute resolution path (or sign a purchase agreement) absent guidance from an expert well versed in GAAP and the nuances of such a potential dispute, especially if large sums are involved.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Dentons is delighted to support a global IT services and consulting firm Miratech as an event host partner at their annual conference called M-Force18 New York on September 27th. The event will be held at Dentons New York office in the heart of Midtown Manhattan, opposite Rockefeller Center.

2 Oct 2018, Seminar, Dallas, United States

We are pleased to offer a program of five sessions designed specifically for in-house counsel. Topics will include:

  • In-house corporate ethical issues
  • What recent Supreme Court decisions mean for business
  • Keeping lawyers out of your benefit plans
  • Litigation tactics for in-house counsel
  • Employment issues in the age of #MeToo
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions