European Union: The EU Commission Should Provide Concrete Reasons For Requesting Information

The statement of reasons of a decision requesting information from a company must be appropriate and disclose the purpose of the request so that the company can provide the Commission with the information necessary to that purpose.

A Welcome Limitation on the Investigatory Powers of the Commission

Information request decisions shall require only information which may assist the Commission in investigating its suspicions of infringement. The Court of Justice ruled on 10 March 2016 that, as a result, when sending information request decisions to companies the Commission is obliged to substantiate its statement of reasons with a clear indication of the products or services under investigation and its suspicions of infringement. The decision's addressees must be in a position to clearly and unequivocally understand the reasoning followed by the Commission to assess the necessity of the information in relation to the purpose of the information request. The requirement to state "the purpose of the request" will prevent the Commission from relying on requests for information to get disproportionate—and likely irrelevant—amounts of information and guarantee—in that regard—the respect of the rights of defense of the addressees of the information request decisions.

Background to the Dispute and the Decision at Issue

In October and November 2008, the European Commission carried out dawn raids at the premises of a number of companies active in the cement industry for suspected cartel infringements. In March 2011, the Commission sent to these companies individual decisions requesting information under Article 18(3) of Regulation 1/20031. The questionnaires attached to the decisions comprised between 78 and 94 pages of questions.

In June 2011 the addressees of these decisions brought actions before the General Court for the annulment of the decisions requesting information at issue. They alleged in particular that the Commission had failed to fulfill its duty to state reasons in the information request decisions. In March 2014, the General Court dismissed their actions2. On appeal to the Court of Justice, the appellants claimed that the Court of Justice should set aside the General Court's judgments and annul the decisions at issue.

The Court of Justice's Ruling

The applicants submitted, inter alia, that the General Court erred in law in holding that their pleas alleging a failure to state reasons in the decisions at issue were unfounded and had to be dismissed. The Court of Justice sided with the appellants and concluded that the Commission's information request decisions did not contain an adequate statement of reasons.3


Article 18(3) of Regulation 1/2003 requires a decision requesting information to "state the legal basis and the purpose of the request, specify what information is required and fix the time-limit within which it is to be provided." The obligation to state specific reasons is a fundamental requirement. It enables addressees to assess the scope of their cooperation duty whilst at the same time safeguarding their rights of defense.

The requirement to state "the purpose of the request" obliges the Commission to clearly indicate the subject of the investigation and therefore to identify the alleged infringement of competition law. According to the Court of Justice, this does not imply that the addressee of the information request decision gets all the information from the Commission's file with regard to the presumed infringement or a precise legal analysis of the alleged infringement. Nevertheless, these decisions must clearly indicate "the suspicions which [the Commission] intends to investigate."4 This is because the Commission is entitled to require the disclosure only of information which may enable it to investigate further these suspicions. "Since the necessity of the information must be judged in relation to the purpose stated in the request for information, that purpose must be indicated with sufficient precision, otherwise it will be impossible to determine whether the information is necessary and the Court will be prevented from exercising judicial review."5 

The Information Request Decisions at Issue

The General Court had stated that the statements of reasons of the decisions at issue were "formulated in very general terms which would have benefited from greater detail and [warranted] criticism in that regard."6  The Court of Justice went further and found that the matters listed in the questionnaire were "extremely numerous and [covered] very different types of information."7  The Court of Justice noted in particular:

"[T]he questionnaire [...] requires the disclosure of extremely extensive and detailed information relating to a considerable number of transactions, both domestic and international, in relation to twelve Member States over a period of ten years. However, the decision at issue does not disclose, clearly and unequivocally, the suspicions of infringement which justify the adoption of that decision and does not make it possible to determine whether the requested information is necessary for the purposes of the investigation."8

The information request decision mentioned only briefly that the Commission was investigating alleged ant-competitive conduct in the cement industry in the EEA and in particular restrictions on imports from countries outside the EEA, market-sharing and price-coordination practices. It also stated that additional information was required in order to assess the compatibility of the practices under investigation with EU competition law. That statement of reasons was held not to be sufficiently precise to determine "either the products to which the investigation relates or the suspicions of infringement justifying the adoption of that decision."9 As a result, the addressees of the decision could not check whether the requested information was "necessary" for the purposes of the investigation.

Looking at the context surrounding the information request, the Court of Justice held that the succinct or vague nature of the statement of reasons could not be "offset" by the reasoning set out in the Commission's decision to initiate proceedings. First, the infringement alleged in the decision to initiate proceedings was also expressed in a generic manner. Second, this decision referred to "cement and related products" and a non-exhaustive list of examples without providing more detail on the products concerned by the investigation. Finally, the two decisions were contradictory with respect to the geographical scope of the alleged infringement.10

Dawnraid Decisions vs Information Request Decisions

Statements of reasons for Commission decisions vary depending on the nature of the decision:

"[A]lthough the Court has held, with respect to inspection decisions, that, even though the Commission is obliged to indicate as precisely as possible what is being sought and the matters to which the investigation must relate, it is, on the other hand, not essential, in a decision ordering an inspection, to define precisely the relevant market, to set out the exact legal nature of the presumed infringements or to indicate the period during which those infringements were allegedly committed."11

This is essentially because at a preliminary stage of the investigation, as is the time of a dawn raid, precise information is not yet available to the Commission. However, for requests of information issued, as in the present case, two years after the first inspections, thresholds are much higher: "an excessively succinct, vague and generic—and in some respects ambiguous—statement of reasons does not fulfil the requirements of the obligation to state reasons laid down in Article 18(3) of Regulation No 1/2003."12 This is particularly the case as the Commission had already sent a number of requests for information to the companies under investigation and already issued a decision to initiate proceedings. At the time of issuing the information request decisions at issue, the Commission already had information that would have allowed it to draft in more precise terms its allegations of infringement.

As a result, the Court of Justice set aside the judgment of the General Court and annulled the Commission decisions requesting information. Anecdotally, in July 2015, while the appeals to the Court of Justice were pending, the Commission decided to close its investigation opened in December 2010; the evidence obtained by the Commission was held not to be "sufficiently conclusive to confirm [the Commission's] initial concerns."13 No infringement decision was addressed to—and no fine was imposed on—the cement manufacturers which complained about these information request decisions.


1 Commission decisions requesting information can either be addressed as a simple request under Article 18(2) of Regulation 1/2003 or by decision under Article 18(3) of Regulation 1/2003. The difference lies essentially in the fact that under Article 18(3) of Regulation 1/2003 the Commission can impose periodic penalties if a company does not disclose the requested information.

2 Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case T-297/11, EU:T:2014:122; HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case T-302/11, EU:T:2014:128; Italmobiliare v Commission, T-305/11, EU:T:2014:126; Schwenk Zement v Kommission, T-306/11, EU:T:2014:123.

3 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, EU:C:2016:149; Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, EU:C:2016:150; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, EU:C:2016:151; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, EU:C:2016:152.

4 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, para. 21; Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, para. 25; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, para. 22; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, para. 23.

5 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, para. 24; Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, para. 28; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, para. 25; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, para. 26.

6 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case T-302/11, EU:T:2014:128, para. 42. See also Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case T-297/11, EU:T:2014:122, para. 36; Italmobiliare v Commission, T-305/11, EU:T:2014:126, para. 68; Schwenk Zement v Kommission, T-306/11, EU:T:2014:123, para. 37.

7 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, para. 27. See also Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, para. 31; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, para. 28; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, para. 29.

8 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, para. 27 (our emphasis). See also Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, para. 31; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, para. 28; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, para. 29.

9 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, para. 31. See also Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, para. 35; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, para. 32; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, para. 33.

10 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, paras 33-36. See also Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, paras 37-40; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, paras 34-37; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, paras 35-38.

11 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, para. 38. See also Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, para. 42; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, para. 39; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, para. 40.

12 HeidelbergCement v Commission, Case C-247/14 P, para. 39. See also Schwenk Zement v Kommission, C-248/14 P, para. 43; Buzzi Unicem v Commission, Case C-267/14 P, para. 40; Italmobiliare v Commission, C-268/14 P, para. 41.

13 Antitrust: Commission closes antitrust proceedings against a number of cement manufacturers, European Commission – Daily News, 31 July 2015.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.