United States: Fifth Circuit Upholds Dismissal Of Securities Fraud Cases For Failure To Allege Scienter

The heightened pleading requirements of the Private Litigation Securities Reform Act (PSLRA) remain strong in the 5th Circuit. On January 13, 2016, the 5th Circuit in Local 731 I.B. of T. Excavators and Pavers Pension Trust Fund v. Diodes, Inc., 810 F.3d 951 (5th Cir. 2016) affirmed the district court's dismissal of a securities class action, holding that the complaint failed to adequately allege facts concerning the defendants' state of mind in making alleged misstatements or omissions to stockholders. In its decision, the court reaffirmed several principles establishing a high bar to satisfying the PSLRA's scienter pleading requirements. The court additionally reined in the somewhat nebulous line of cases, holding that an officer's position in a company may support an inference of scienter when "special circumstances" are present.

Plaintiffs in the case were putative stockholders in Diodes, Inc., a Texas-based semiconductor company with a major manufacturing operation in China. In February of 2011, Diodes warned its investors of anticipated labor shortages in China which would adversely affect the company's manufacturing output. Based on the expected shortages, the company predicted that revenue would be down in the first quarter while Diodes hired and trained new workers. Diodes followed this announcement with a statement in May 2011 that the company expected that the labor shortage would be resolved in the second quarter, with gross profit margins being comparable to the first quarter. In June 2011, Diodes noted a "slower than expected" recovery in China and revised its guidance to predict a slightly lower gross profit margin. Following both the May and June announcements, Diodes' stock price dropped.

Plaintiffs filed their securities fraud class action suit almost two years later against Diodes and two of its corporate officers. Plaintiffs did not allege that the company's forward-looking statements in the first two quarters of 2011 were false—indeed, Diodes' predictions largely turned out to be accurate. Rather, plaintiffs claimed that the statements were misleading because defendants improperly omitted details regarding the extent and cause of the labor shortages, which plaintiffs alleged were due to the company's labor policies in China. Plaintiffs argued that there were three different factors that raised a strong inference that defendants "must have known" that Diodes' internal policies would cause the labor shortage.

First, plaintiffs argued that the corporate officer defendants must have known by virtue of their positions as top company executives. While plaintiffs acknowledged the "predominant theme" in 5th Circuit case law that an officer's position with a company does not suffice to create an inference of scienter, plaintiffs nonetheless argued that defendants' positions, taken together with "special circumstances," were sufficient to infer a culpable mental state. Plaintiffs based this argument on a handful of 5th Circuit cases. Surveying these cases, the court in Diodes derived four considerations that may suggest "special circumstances" sufficient to tip the scales in favor of an inference of scienter: (1) whether the company is small, thus making it more likely that executives are familiar with the intricacies of day-to-day operations; (2) whether the transaction at issue was critical to the company's existence; (3) whether the misrepresented or omitted information would have been readily apparent to the speaker; and (4) whether defendants' statements were internally inconsistent.

The court found none of the above four factors to be present in Diodes. Diodes was a large company with more than 4,000 employees. There was no indication that the labor shortages at issue threatened the company's continued vitality, nor was there any indication that defendants were aware that the company's policies were a significant contributor to the shortages. Finally, the defendants' statements were both consistent and accurate regarding the extent of the labor shortage, as well as its effects on the company's revenue.

Second, plaintiffs sought to draw a strong inference of scienter from Diodes' early shipments of orders without prior customer authorization. Plaintiffs argued that this practice was intended to conceal the true impact of the labor problems by artificially propping up earnings. The court did not find this argument persuasive, noting that early shipping is a legal practice that may be supported by any number of legitimate reasons. The court additionally reasoned that shipping orders early would actually deplete inventory and exacerbate any manufacturing issues caused by a labor shortage. Therefore, the practice did little to indicate defendants' intent to conceal the shortage from investors.

Third, plaintiffs argued that the timing and nature of certain stock transactions made by one of the defendant corporate officers created an inference of scienter. The court acknowledged that some of the stock sales pointed out by plaintiffs could be viewed as suspicious in isolation because they were out of line with the officer's typical trading behavior. However, the court declined to draw an inference of scienter from the sales because they represented a relatively small amount of the officer's total stock ownership (about 12 percent) and because there were no other corroborating factors sufficiently alleged.

Considering these factors individually and as a whole, the 5th Circuit held that the plaintiffs' allegations failed to satisfy the PSLRA's requirement to plead with particularity facts supporting a strong inference of scienter. Notably, in considering each of plaintiffs' allegations, the court repeatedly referenced the fact that the company had warned investors of a labor shortage during the class period on multiple occasions and even accurately predicted the labor shortage's impact on Diodes' financial results. Undoubtedly, these were important facts to the 5th Circuit, which appeared tempted to dismiss the case on those grounds alone. The court saw little need for requiring additional disclosure, observing that "[m]ost reasonable investors would rather receive an accurate 'bottom line' assessment of a disclosed company problem than all its assumptions and nuances."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions