ARTICLE
14 March 2016

Chief Judge Stark Denies Defendant's Motion For Judgment As A Matter Law On Noninfringement, Invalidity And Damages Following Jury Verdict Of Infringement

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp., the Court denied defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law on noninfringement, invalidity and damages with respect to U.S. Patent No. 5,987,610.
United States Intellectual Property

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp., Civil Action No. 10-1067-LPS (D.Del., March 10, 2016), the Court denied defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law ("JMOL") on noninfringement, invalidity and damages with respect to U.S. Patent No. 5,987,610 ("the '610 patent"). In doing so, the Court found there was a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to support the jury verdict of infringement and no invalidity of claim 7 of the '610 patent – for which the jury awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $8 million following a 10-day jury trial. Id. at 1-2.

A copy of the Memorandum Order is attached.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More