United States: Investments In The Marijuana Industry Hold Potential For Significant Growth, Despite Some Uncertainty

Investors in marijuana-related companies witnessed several key developments in 2015 as the industry worked around initial obstacles, states refined regulatory frameworks, American public support of legalization increased, and banks and other service providers increasingly did business with marijuana companies. However, marijuana remains illegal at the federal level, and many investors will remain hesitant about making investments with growers in the U.S. until the federal government clarifies its position. In the meantime, many investors remain focused on businesses that provide products and services to growers or businesses in the Canadian market. That being said, with the market expanding as quickly as it is, even ancillary businesses have potential for significant growth, and investors and the media continue to closely monitor regulatory and other industry developments.

Developments at the Federal Level

Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, and while Congress and the executive branch have not legalized marijuana or rescheduled it from Schedule 1, they have taken steps to divert resources away from prosecution. In the Cole Memorandum of 2013, the Department of Justice ("DOJ") instructed federal prosecutors not to prosecute marijuana cases in states whose regulatory schemes meet specified regulation priorities. During 2014, when some federal prosecutors continued to pursue actions against vendors of medical marijuana in states that had legalized such sales, Congress included the Rohrabacher-Farr medical marijuana amendment in the end-of-year omnibus budget bill that stopped federal funds from being used to prevent states with medical marijuana programs from "implementing their own State laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana."

In April 2015, a DOJ representative announced that the department interpreted the amendment to mean only that it was restricted from prosecuting states and that it did not forbid prosecution of individuals and medical marijuana companies. Representatives Rohrabacher and Farr disagreed, and the federal District Court in the Northern District of California in October held that the DOJ may not prosecute marijuana companies operating in compliance with state medical marijuana laws. The Cole Memorandum and Rohrabacher-Farr medical marijuana amendment are widely viewed as important steps toward legitimizing the industry, but do not resolve the ongoing conflict between state regulation and federal prohibition of marijuana. There were hopes that the budget bill for 2016 would take further steps to scale back federal prohibition. While it eliminated certain prohibitions on the hemp industry and re-enacted the Rohrabacher-Farr medical marijuana amendment, which had been set to expire, the bill failed to satisfy other hopes. For example, it did not end the ban on veterans affairs physicians discussing medical marijuana with veterans, nor expand the Rohrabacher- Farr medical marijuana amendment in a similar way to protect sales of recreational marijuana in states with established regulatory regimes, nor clarify banking access by state-regulated marijuana companies.

Developments at the State and International Levels

Notwithstanding the obstacles, marijuana legalization continues to spread, though the lack of uniformity among the state regimes is clear. For example, in Colorado, an entity that grows marijuana can, but is not required to, sell it via retail; in Washington state, one cannot do both; in New York state, retailers of medical marijuana must grow their own product (which may not be smoked); and in Washington, D.C., it is forbidden to sell marijuana directly.

California: With record-high support for legalization in California, the state is mobilizing for a legalization vote on recreational marijuana in 2016. In 2015, efforts focused on increasing regulation of the state's legal medical marijuana program, which dates back to the 1990s. Historically, California has not successfully limited access to those holding marijuana licenses, but in October, the state passed the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act. "This new structure will make sure patients have access to medical marijuana, while ensuring a robust tracking system," Gov. Jerry Brown stated. "This sends a clear and certain signal to our federal counterparts that California is implementing robust controls."

The new regulations are noteworthy from an investor's perspective because, among other reasons, for-profit companies may now obtain licenses to grow and sell medical marijuana, and cities and counties may now ban medical marijuana within their borders. The latter regulation originally had a March 1, 2016, deadline for localities to ban medical marijuana, causing a stir of activity throughout the state, this deadline has since been removed. As these new regulations take effect, California is also approaching a November 2016 vote for the legalization of recreational marijuana, and support is gathering around the initiative, named the Adult Use of Marijuana Act.

Ohio: In November, Ohio could have become the fifth state to legalize marijuana for recreational purposes, but voters rejected the Issue 3 referendum by a wide 64% to 36% margin. With estimates of potential sales reaching $1.1 billion, it might have been the biggest legal market yet in the U.S. The referendum faltered in part because of a controversial feature that would have created a monopoly for 10 marijuana providers. The organization ResponsibleOhio, which spent millions of dollars to support Issue 3 behind contributions from the 10 listed providers, introduced a campaign mascot named Buddie, raising concerns among voters that the industry would target children. Aiming to stop Issue 3 even if Ohioans had voted for it, dozens of state legislators supported Issue 2, which, by imposing additional burdens on any referendum that would create a monopoly, would likely have conflicted with Issue 3 had both passed. Ohio voters passed Issue 2, 52% to 48%. The stage is now set for another legalization attempt in 2016, with signatures being collected for the next ballot initiative.

Canada and Mexico: The northern and southern neighbors of the U.S. also made headlines in 2015 relating to recreational marijuana. Canada has had medical marijuana regulations since 2003, prompted by the Supreme Court of Ontario ruling that patients with certain medical conditions had the constitutional right to medical marijuana. Important for investors and the industry, Canada's regulations have been enforced in a relatively clear manner. In October, with the election of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has repeatedly called for the end of prohibition, Canada increasingly appears to be on the path to full legalization of recreational marijuana.

Meanwhile, on Nov. 4, the Mexican Supreme Court ruled that growing, possessing and smoking marijuana recreationally is legal under a theory of individual autonomy. This does not mean that marijuana is now widely available in Mexico. The ruling was limited to the named plaintiffs, and Mexico has not legalized medical marijuana, so it has no regulations yet in place. But the court decision offers one potential path for expanded access as discussions increase worldwide.

Banking Developments

Following guidance by the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") that banks could offer services to marijuana companies whose activities were considered low priority, marijuana companies have had slightly improved access to banking services, although as a general matter continue to have difficulties maintaining accounts. In the absence of more definitive federal action, some states have drafted legislation to enable marijuana credit unions. Such legislation, however, has so far failed to overcome federal restrictions on providing either FDIC insurance or a Federal Reserve master account to financial institutions servicing the marijuana industry, without which marijuana companies are unable to access check clearing, electronic fund transfers and other interbank services. Indeed, Marijuana Business Daily reported in December that 70% of plant-touching businesses do not have a bank account, and accounts are frequently terminated. A Freedom of Information Act request revealed that, as of January 2015, 3,157 marijuana-related Suspicious Activity Reports had been filed by 374 individual financial institutions, with nearly half being "Marijuana Termination" reports indicating closure of an account. So while at least some established banks — possibly regional banks and credit unions — are providing services to marijuana companies, until the government acts more definitively, banking access will continue to be limited.

Insurance Developments

It appears from media reports that some carriers are already providing commercial coverage in this space. Although the FinCEN guidance to financial institutions described above does not apply to insurance companies expressly, it is possible that the federal government could expect insurers to be guided by it, and a number of the principles set forth in the guidance have analogues in the insurance business.

We are not aware of any particular legal guidelines — whether from the federal government, any state insurance regulator or any standard-setting body such as the National Association of Insurance Commissioners — governing the provision of insurance to businesses engaged in legal marijuana-related activities. In the absence of such guidance, and with marijuana remaining illegal in many states as well as at the federal level, it is possible that an insurance policy written to a policyholder in the U.S. purporting to cover risk associated with marijuana-related activities would be determined to be unenforceable or even unlawful under the laws of such states or of the U.S. However, notwithstanding the challenges, the development of the industry (and therefore data that can be used in making underwriting determinations) and the pricing power in a less competitive market suggest the trend toward provision of at least some types of coverage may continue.

Intellectual Property Developments

Companies have continued their efforts to build and defend their brands by utilizing both federal and state protections. Trademark applications that include the term "marijuana" in the goods and services description have risen from 20 in 2012 to 200 apiece in 2014 and 2015, while issued registrations have correspondingly risen from 12 to 33. States where marijuana has been legalized have also seen an increase in trademark applications. In Colorado there are approximately 700 trade names and 200 trademarks registered that include the word "marijuana" or a synonym. Additionally, the USPTO has not rejected and continues to review multiple marijuana plant patent applications that have been submitted.

Looking Ahead in 2016

Companies — and their investors — continue to face a myriad of risks associated with uncertainty over future regulatory developments concerning the marijuana industry. Companies with SEC-registered securities frequently reference risk factors, including ongoing federal prohibition; potential criminal and civil penalties; a reliance on additional states legalizing medical and recreational marijuana; increasing mobilization of groups and individuals opposed to legalization; banking difficulties; difficulties accessing bankruptcy courts; the rapid changes in the industry; and lack of access to adequate capital — most of which apply equally to privately held companies.

Notwithstanding the risks, investment in the marijuana industry has continued to escalate. It remains to be seen how much will be clarified through 2016, and the federal issues will depend in no small part on the U.S. presidential election. As large states like California and Ohio prepare for legalization initiatives, it is clear that there will be increasing pressure on the federal government to clarify its position on issues such as banking access. As these issues become incrementally clearer, and barring any significant policy change at the federal or key state levels, the trend toward increasing liberalization and associated comfort levels of investors seems likely to continue, with the tipping point still being the resolution of the federal-state conflict.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions