CMS Doubles Down On Targeting Part D Enrollee Prescription Drug Abuse, But Will Stakeholders Agree?

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
With the release of its 2017 draft call letter, CMS continues its push to curb opioid dependence, overdose and death among Medicare Part D enrollees.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

With the release of its 2017 draft call letter, CMS continues its push to curb opioid dependence, overdose and death among Medicare Part D enrollees. To that end, CMS proposes that Part D plan sponsors edit their benefit designs to target opioid overutilization at the point-of-sale. The letter also reminds Part D sponsors that benefit designs that impede medication-assisted treatment for opioid addiction, including high cost sharing, will not be approved by CMS.

The point-of-sale target is not a new proposal. CMS included an expectation in its 2016 draft call letter that Part D plan sponsors implement a soft point-of-sale edit to prevent improper opioid use. The recommendation was delayed, however, due to stakeholder concerns that enrollee access to needed prescription drugs could be disrupted.

Despite the commendable effort by CMS to reduce opioid use disorders and overdose, disagreement persists over Medicare Part D performance expectations aimed at enhanced utilization controls. For example, there has been significant pushback from stakeholders in response to recently solicited comments by CMS on whether providers should be required to consult a patient's history on their state's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program in an effort to identify the patient's risk of nonmedical use of controlled substances. Will this latest CMS proposal meet with similar opposition?

The deadline for submitting comments to the 2017 Draft Call Letter is March 4, 2016, and the final 2017 Call Letter will be published on April 4, 2016.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More