United States: The Supreme Court's Decision In Alice Corp. V. CLS Bank Has Taken A Heavy Toll On Patents For Computer-Related Inventions

The patent statue broadly defines patent-eligible subject matter as "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter" and any improvements.  But inventors cannot patent laws of nature, natural phenomena, or abstract ideas.  The prohibition on patenting abstract ideas has caused federal courts to declare hundreds of patents for computer-related inventions invalid since the Supreme Court's June 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank.  After Alice, about 70% of challenges for failure to claim patent-eligible subject matter have succeeded.

In Alice, the Supreme Court articulated a two-step process for assessing patent-eligible subject matter in the context of computer-related inventions.  Initially, determine whether the patent claim at issue is directed to an abstract idea.  If so, consider whether the claim elements individually or in combination "transform" the claim into a patent-eligible invention.  The Court described the second step as a search for an "inventive concept" to ensure that the patent amounts to "significantly more" than an abstract idea.

For the second step, the Supreme Court in Alice explained that "the mere recitation of a generic computer cannot transform a patent-ineligible abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention."  Further, according to the Court, claiming well-understood, routine, and conventional features specified at a high level of generality does not suffice for an "inventive concept."  But the Court provided little guidance beyond those somewhat extreme examples.  In addition, the Court did not "labor to delimit the precise contours of the 'abstract ideas' category."

Absent clear guidance from the Supreme Court, lower courts have at times had difficulty determining what constitutes an abstract idea and what amounts to an inventive concept.  For example, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has said, "Distinguishing between claims that recite a patent-eligible invention and claims that add too little to a patent-ineligible abstract concept can be difficult, as the line separating the two is not always clear."  Similarly, District Judge Rodney Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas, who has more patent cases on his docket than any other judge, has remarked, "[T]he contours are often unclear between those inventions that are directed to an abstract idea and those that are not."  Another district judge has likened the analysis to Justice Stewart's famous statement concerning obscenity: hard to define "[b]ut I know it when I see it."

Complicating matters, the Supreme Court has observed that all inventions at some level "embody, use, reflect, rest upon, or apply laws of nature, natural phenomena, or abstract ideas."  One district judge has noted that "any claim, described at a certain level of generality, can be challenged as directed to an abstract idea."

A review of decisions concerning computer-related inventions shows a trend.  A court's characterization of the patented technology often determines the patent-eligibility result.  For instance, if a court describes the underlying concept broadly, it will likely decide that the patent claims only an abstract idea.

As an example, in OIP Technologies v. Amazon.com, OIP asserted a patent claiming a "method of pricing a product for sale" comprising several steps, including generating statistics concerning test prices, estimating likely outcomes for various potential prices based on the statistics, and selecting a price based on the estimated outcomes.  The Federal Circuit decided that "the claims are directed to the concept of offer-based price optimization."  After describing the underlying concept broadly, the court reasoned that "[b]eyond the abstract idea of offer-based price optimization, the claims merely recite . . . conventional computer activities or routine data-gathering steps."  Hence, the court held the asserted patent invalid because it did not claim patent-eligible subject matter.

As another example, in Intellectual Ventures v. Capital One, Intellectual Ventures alleged infringement of claims concerning an "apparatus for manipulating XML documents" comprising "a processor," "a user interface," and six "components" that organized, identified, mapped, defined, detected modification of, and modified data in XML documents.  When addressing the first step in the patent-eligibility analysis, the district court said, "[T]he patent is, at its core, directed to the abstract idea of organizing, displaying, and manipulating data related to business documents."  When addressing the second step, the court concluded that the processor and the user interface did "not transform the abstract idea into a patent-worthy inventive concept."

Alice has taken a heavy toll on patents for computer-related inventions, particularly software patents.  The patent claims that have weathered the storm have usually done so by including meaningful limitations that sufficiently narrow their scope.

For instance, the Federal Circuit in DDR Holdings v. Hotels.com upheld the validity of a patent covering systems and methods for retaining website visitors.  The patents addressed a problem occurring when a third-party merchant advertised on a host website:  Visitors to the host website were transported the third-party merchant's website when they clicked on the merchant's advertisement on the host website.  The patents solved that problem by creating a new, composite website displaying the merchant's product information but keeping the host website's "look and feel."  The composite website gave a visitor the impression of viewing pages served by the host website.

In DDR, the Federal Circuit concluded that the claim elements taken together as an ordered combination amounted to an inventive concept for resolving a particular Internet-centric problem, and thus recited patent-eligible subject matter.  The court reasoned that the claims at issue did "not attempt to preempt every application of the idea of increasing sales by making two web pages look the same" but instead covered "a specific way to automate" composite web page creation by incorporating content from multiple sources "to solve a problem faced by websites on the Internet."

In upholding the validity of the claims at issue, however, the Federal Circuit cautioned that "that not all claims purporting to address Internet-centric challenges are eligible for patent."  When considering patents for computer-related inventions after Alice, the Federal Circuit has, except in DDR, decided that the challenged claims did not recite patent-ineligible subject matter.

Further, the Federal Circuit in a later decision limited DDR when addressing a patent relating to "customizing web page content as a function of navigation history and information known about the user."  The court viewed that customizing as analogous to tailoring advertising content based on customer location and time of day, which it considered long prevalent and known "for decades."  The court noted that in DDR the patent "provided an Internet-based solution to solve a problem unique to the Internet."  The court then said, "The patent claims here do not address problems unique to the Internet, so DDR has no applicability."  Because the claims at issue recited "conventional computer components . . . operating in a conventional manner," the court decided that they lacked an inventive concept.

Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit's decision in DDR supplies guidance for patents addressing problems unique to computers or the Internet.  For instance, in DataTern v. Microstrategy, the district court considered a patent with claims covering a "method of interfacing an object oriented software application with a relational database" and found them eligible for patent protection.  Citing DDR, the court reasoned that the "patent is directed at solving a problem that specifically arises in the realm of computing; indeed, object-oriented programs exist only in the realm of computers, and relational databases are utilized primarily, if not exclusively, on computers."  The court then ruled that the claims "appear to be sufficiently limited in scope as to supply an 'inventive concept.'"

Similarly, in California Institute of Technology v. Hughes Communications, the district court considered patents with method and apparatus claims relating to error correction in transmitted data.  When addressing the first step in the patent-eligibility analysis, the court determined that the claims were "directed to the abstract idea of encoding and decoding data for the purpose of achieving error correction."  But when addressing the second step, the court decided that the claims contained "meaningful limitations" representing "sufficiently inventive concepts."  The court based that decision on claim limitations specifying particular ways to achieve encoding and decoding.

Many unexpired software patents were granted before Supreme Court's decision in Alice.  Before filing a lawsuit alleging infringement of a software patent, the patent owner should scrutinize the claims in light of Alice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.