ARTICLE
18 February 2016

European Banking Authority Consults On Draft Guidelines On Implicit Support In Securitizations

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
On January 20, 2016, the EBA published proposed Guidelines on implicit support for securitization transactions as required by the CRR.
European Union Finance and Banking

On January 20, 2016, the EBA published proposed Guidelines on implicit support for securitization transactions (i.e. support provided by a firm where it is not contractually obliged to do so), as required by the CRR. Examples of implicit support include purchases of deteriorating credit risk exposures from an underlying pool or improvement of quality of credit enhancements through the addition of higher quality risk exposures. The CRR requires that any reduction in capital requirements gained through a securitization must be justified by a corresponding transfer of risk to third parties. The CRR restricts the provision of implicit support, because it does not result in significant risk transfer to third parties, by requiring firms to hold a minimum of own funds against all of the securitized exposures as if they had not been securitized. A transaction is not considered to provide support if it is executed under arm's length conditions and is taken into account in the assessment of significant risk transfer. The EBA's proposed Guidelines cover what constitutes arm's length conditions and when a transaction is not structured to provide support. For arm's length conditions, an objective test is provided and the assessment must be made having due regard to the information available at the time when the transaction is entered into. The EBA also proposes guidance on the application of the factors for assessing whether a transaction is structured to provide support and when firms should notify their national regulator about the transaction. The draft Guidelines only apply to implicit support. Support provided by a firm under its contractual obligations (explicit support) is addressed under existing EBA guidelines on significant risk transfer. Responses to the consultation are due by April 26, 2016.

The consultation paper is available at: http://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1340842/EBA-CP-2016- 01+%28Consultation+Paper+on+Guidelines+on+implicit+support%29.pdf and the EBA Guidelines on Significant Risk Transfer under contractual obligations are available at: https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/749215/EBA-GL-2014- 05+Guidelines+on+Significant+Risk+Transfer.pdf.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More