United States: Ten Key Board Decisions In 2015 – Part Two

In part two of this series, we continue to review the most important, or at least most interesting PTAB decisions of 2015. Part one can be found here.

6.) MasterImage 3D, Inc. v. RealD Inc., IPR2015-00040, Paper 42 (Jul. 15, 2015)

The Board designated its MasterImage Order as "representative" on the issue of motions to amend and clarified that the burden is on the Patent Owner to demonstrate that the proposed amendments are patentable over the prior art of record and also prior art known to patent owner. Citing Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., IPR2012-00027, Paper 26, the Board defined "prior art of record" as "a) any material art in the prosecution history of the patent; b) any material art of record in the current proceeding, including art asserted in grounds on which the Board did not institute review; and c) any material art of record in any other proceeding before the Office involving the patent." The other category, "prior art known to the Patent Owner", is equivalent to "[n]o more than the material prior art that Patent Owner makes of record in the current proceeding pursuant to its duty of candor and good faith to the Office under 37 C.F.R. § 42.11." According to the Board, once the Patent Owner makes a prima facie case of patentability, the burden shifts to the Petitioner to rebut the arguments but the ultimate burden, however, remains with the Patent Owner.

Many believed that MasterImage was a signal from the Board that it was lessening the requirements placed on Patent Owners to encourage more motions to amend, and while the data seems to be trending in that direction, the number of motions to amend is too small so as to be significant. Only 22 motions to amend were filed in 2015 after the MasterImage decision, which is only three more than the 19 filed during the same time period in 2014.

7.) ServiceNow, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc., CBM2015-00107, Paper 12 (Sep. 11, 2015)

This case is important for its detailed analysis of what constitutes a Covered Business Method (CBM). The PTAB denied institution of a CBM petition because Petitioner failed to show that the patent is a covered business method patent. In doing so, the Board highlighted that the analysis should focus on the claims, not on exemplary teachings in the specification.

8.) LG Electronics, Inc. v. Mondis Technology Ltd., IPR2015-00937, Paper 8 (Sep. 17, 2015)

In past decisions, the Board has found that service of a subsequent complaint for infringement of a patent does not restart 35 U.S.C. § 315(b)'s one-year window for a petitioner to file an IPR petition after being served with an earlier complaint for infringement, unless the earlier complaint is dismissed without prejudice, leaving the parties as though the action had never been filed. See, e.g., Macauto U.S.A. v. BOS GmbH & KG, IPR2012-00004, Paper No. 18 at 15 (Jan. 24, 2013);Universal Remote Control Inc. v. Universal Elecs. Inc., IPR2013-00168, Paper No. 9 (Aug. 26, 2013). In LG Electronics, the Board reiterated this reasoning and designated its decision precedential.

9.) Coalition for Affordable Drugs VI, LLC (Kyle Bass) v. Celgene Corp., IPR2015-01092, Paper 19 (Sep. 25, 2015)

Perhaps no petitions for IPR have raised more controversy than those filed by the Coalition for Affordable Drugs and hedge fund manager Kyle Bass. The Coalition has filed multiple petitions for IPR against the patents of various drug companies, unapologetically using the petitions as part of an investment strategy to hurt stock prices of targeted companies and profit by short selling its stocks. In this case, Celgene filed a motion for sanctions alleging abuse of process. In deciding against Celgene, the Board held that Congress did not limit inter partes review proceedings to parties having a competitive interest in the patent. According to the Board, "Congress intended inter partes reviews to allow parties to challenge a granted patent as an expeditious and less costly alternative to litigation . . . [and] the AIA sought to establish a more efficient and streamlined patent system that improved patent quality, while at the same time limiting unnecessary and counterproductive litigation costs." The Board declined to take a position as to the merits of Mr. Bass's strategy but noted that "profit is at the heart of nearly every patent and nearly every inter partes review."

10.) Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc., IPR2012-00026, IPR2013-00109, Paper 80 (Dec. 9, 2015)

This decision goes down in infamy as the first decision of the Board following remand from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). In the original February 19, 2014 decision (Paper 73), the Board found claims 1, 3, 6-7, 9-12, 14, and 22-23 unpatentable as anticipated, claims 1, 3, and 10 as obvious, and that Microsoft had not established that claim 24 was unpatentable. After finding that claims 6, 7, and 9, among others were anticipated, the Board declined to address the ground that claims 6, 7, and 9 were also obvious. Both parties appealed to the CAFC.

On June 19, 2015, the CAFC concluded that the Board had erred in its claim construction and vacated the determinations that claims 1, 3, 6-7, 9-10, 22, and 23 were not patentable, and remanded "for proceedings consistent with this opinion." The CAFC affirmed the finding of unpatentability of claims 11-12, and 14, and the determination that claim 24 was patentable.

On remand, the Board ordered the parties to file briefs on the effect of the Federal Circuit's decision. Microsoft limited its challenge to  obviousness of claims 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, and 10 and anticipation of claims 22 and 23.

With this decision, the Board again found claims 1, 3, 6-7, 9-10, 22, and 23 unpatentable. The Board found that there was nothing improper about finding the claims unpatentable on a different ground than in its original decision because the ground was present in the Petition and Microsoft relied on the same claim charts and declaration as filed with the Petition; therefore, the argument was not "new". Moreover, since the Board did not reach the merits of the argument in its Final Written Decision, there was no final decision to appeal, nothing prevented the Board from deciding the issue on remand.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
23 Sep 2018, Seminar, Chicago, United States

Finnegan is a sponsor of the Intellectual Property Owners Association Annual Meeting, supporting the Women in IP Networking Brunch.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

26 Sep 2018, Webinar, Washington, DC, United States

This latest series of webinars will explore emerging trends in the changing intellectual property (IP) legal environment in Europe and the United States.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions