United States: From Runway To Replica: Intellectual Property Strategies For Protecting Fashion Designs

Last Updated: February 12 2016
Article by Natasha N. Reed

Designers like Alexander Wang, Rebecca Minkoff, and Michael Kors are all gearing up to premier their 2016 fall/winter collections this month during New York Fashion Week.  Fashion Week draws more than 230,000 attendees each year to over 500 runway shows and events in New York City.  The economic impact of this biannual event is estimated to be close to $900 million. That's more than the U.S. Open, which generates approximately $750 million annually for New York, and the Super Bowl, which generated an estimated $550 million when it was held in the New York metropolitan area in 2014.

Despite these numbers, the economic impact on the fashion industry from the sale of counterfeit and infringing fashion products is staggering.  A report issued by the EU's Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market found that approximately 10% of fashion products sold are counterfeits, amounting to approximately $28.5 billion of lost revenues per year. Some designers also fear that inventions such as 3D printing could make it possible for even the average consumer to replicate runway fashions.  Rapper turned designer Kanye West, who is expected to release the third installment of his fashion collection "Yeezy" at New York Fashion Week this month, echoed this fear, noting that 3D printing could one day impact the fashion industry, just as "the internet destroyed the music industry."  But even without 3D printers, a consumer can easily obtain a less expensive replica of an independent designer's fashions, sometimes before the design hits the general market. It only takes one cell phone photo, snapped at a fashion show and sent overseas, to cheaply manufacture less expensive replicas and ship them back to the states before the designer has even had a chance to produce and sell her original design.

Thankfully, U.S. intellectual property law offers designers some protection against the sale of counterfeit and infringing fashion products.

Patent Law

U.S. patent law provides protection for certain fashion products.  Design patents, which last for 14 years, can protect footwear, jewelry, handbags and other fashion accessories, provided the design is novel, nonobvious and ornamental (as opposed to functional).  Some well-known fashion designs are the subject of U.S. design patents, including Bottega Veneta's "Veneta" handbag and Jimmy Choo's "With a Twist" shoe design. Clothing designs can be difficult to patent because they are unlikely to be novel or nonobvious enough to merit patent protection.  Occasionally, a design patent will be granted for clothing, like Christian Dior's coat dress.  However, design patents can take up to a year to obtain, which can sometimes exceed the lifespan of a seasonal fashion design.

Copyright Law

U.S. copyright law protects jewelry designs and certain aspects of other fashion designs, such as original patterns and prints, and design elements like belt buckles or embellishments, provided that the designs are original, creative, and physically or conceptually separable from the function of the article.  However, copyright protection does not extend to clothing itself, because clothing is considered a "useful article" and unable to exist independently from its utilitarian features.  The fashion industry has lobbied Congress to extend copyright protection to clothing and, over the years, Congress has proposed several bills that would provide for greater protection. The latest bill is the Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act (known as the "Fashion Bill") which, if passed, would extend copyright protection for up to three years to original fashion designs, including clothing.  Proponents of the bill state that it will close the gap in U.S. copyright law and keep up with the laws of certain European countries, which already provide copyright protection for apparel. Opponents of the bill state that the law will stifle creativity and increase legal costs for independent designers.  For now, the bill remains stuck in a congressional subcommittee.

Trademark Law

Currently, U.S trademark law offers the best protection for fashion designs.  In addition to protecting a designer's name and logo, trademark law can also protect fashion design elements, including prints and patterns (like Burberry's plaid print), distinctive stitching (like the U-shaped jean pocket stitching owned by True Religion/Guru Denim), and colors (like Christian Louboutin's red bottom shoe soles).  Trademark law also protects the design and appearance (known as the "trade dress") of certain fashion products, including handbags (like Hermès' Birkin bag) and shoes (like Converse's Chuck Taylor sneakers). In addition to registering these marks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, designers can also record their trademark registrations with U.S. Customs & Border Protection, in an effort to prevent the importation of infringing products. However, trademark protection only extends to fashion designs that are non-functional and have achieved a certain level of consumers recognition. Thus, it is highly unlikely that the overall design of a pair of Isabel Marant boots, premiering on the runway at New York Fashion Week, would immediately be entitled to trademark protection, since consumer-source recognition can take time to develop.  Additionally, while trademark law may protect distinctive design elements or a combination of those features, it remains difficult to obtain trademark protection for the entire "look" of a piece of clothing.


While U.S. intellectual property law may not allow designers to protect every single aspect of a design, several designers have used the law to successfully shut down counterfeiting and design piracy operations in recent years, with big wins in U.S. federal courts.  Below are a few recent cases where fashion houses and designers have successfully used creative tactics to stop counterfeits and infringements:

Chloe and other luxury fashion brands successfully sued Pakistan-based e-commerce company TradeKey and others for contributory infringement and violation of U.S. counterfeiting laws, by aiding in the sale of counterfeit products.  The fashion companies launched an investigation which uncovered that TradeKey actively promoted and facilitated the sale of counterfeit goods, by operating a virtual swap meet which allowed its members to engage in wholesale counterfeiting of the plaintiffs' products.  The Central District of California granted a broad injunction against TradeKey, which included compliance and monitoring requirements. The Court also awarded Chloe and the other plaintiffs statutory damages against TradeKey and the actual sellers of the infringing products. Chloe SAS et al v. Sawabeh Information Services, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187398 (C.D. Ca. 2013) and 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60188 (C.D. Ca. 2014).

Tory Burch successfully shut down hundreds of rogue websites, operated by 41 defendants based in China, which had been selling counterfeit copies of the company's signature ballet flats and accessories bearing the Tory Burch name and "T" logo.  The Southern District of New York granted Tory Burch a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction, freezing the defendants' PayPal accounts.  The Court handed down an award of $4 million in damages against each defendant, totaling $164 million.  Since the defendants are all based in China, it is unlikely that Tory Burch will fully collect on the judgment.  Nonetheless, the assets held by the defendants' PayPal accounts were released in partial satisfaction of the award and the judgment, which is reported to be one of the largest sums ever awarded for counterfeiting fashion products. Tory Burch LLC v. Yong Sheng Int'l. Trade Co. Ltd., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158882 (S.D.N.Y.  May 13, 2011).

Gucci America, after successfully going after TheBagAddiction.com for selling fake Gucci bags, sued three credit card processing entities for their role in enabling TheBagAddiction.com to process online payments. Gucci claimed that the credit card processing companies knew that the products were fake and charged the counterfeit retailer a higher rate as a result.  Although Gucci could not establish direct liability, the Court found that the credit card processing companies did meet the test for contributory infringement, because they either knew that the Gucci-branded goods were counterfeit, or were willfully blind to that fact, and the service they provided gave them control and the ability to monitor the unlawful activity.  All claims were subsequently dropped pursuant to a confidential settlement. Gucci America, Inc. v. Frontline Processing Corp., 721 F. Supp.2d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).

Balenciaga and other luxury brands, including Bottega Veneta, Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent, successfully obtained a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, freezing various bank accounts belonging to various individuals selling counterfeit copies of the plaintiff's fashion products, including overseas bank accounts.  The court held that, because it had jurisdiction over the defendants, it also had authority to freeze assets under the defendants' control, regardless of whether the assets were in or outside the United States. Balenciaga and the other plaintiffs eventually obtained a default judgment for $12.4 million and an order from the court directing all parties holding assets for the defendants to liquidate those assets in partial satisfaction of judgment. Balenciaga America, Inc. v. Dollinger, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107733 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2010).


With the foregoing in mind, fashion designers should consult with legal counsel and consider all areas of intellectual property law in order to maximize protection in the United States for their fashion designs. Below are some tips:

  1. At a minimum, designers should file for a copyright registration for any original prints and patterns, and consider filing for a copyright registration for any design elements that can be physically or conceptually separated from the functional aspects of the designer's apparel and accessories.
  2. If the fashion design is expected to last beyond a season and can be considered an ornamental, novel and nonobvious design, then the designer should also consider applying for a design patent.
  3. Designers should also consult with legal counsel to consider whether their fashion designs, or any of the individual elements that make up their design, are nonfunctional and have sufficient acquired distinctiveness to merit trademark protection and registration as a trade dress.
  4. Further, while most designers and brands have taken the basic step to register their names and logos as trademarks, many overlook recording their trademark registrations with U.S. Customs. In fact, some well-known designers and brands participating in Fashion Week this month do not seem to have their trademarks recorded at U.S. Customs.  We could not find any Customs recordals for Nicole Miller, Marchesa, and Hervé Léger, to name a few, although they all have registered U.S. trademarks and are well-known brands vulnerable to counterfeiting. Even Kanye West seems to have overlooked recording his name and trademarks with U.S. Customs.
  5. Designers should also consider creative ways to stop infringements, including seeking to freeze the infringer's assets and bringing third-party liability actions that target landlords and flea market owners that house counterfeit and infringing products. Fashion designers can also go after internet service providers and payment processing companies that enable online purchases of counterfeit and infringing goods.

But fashion designers must also recognize that not all replicas are actionable.  While counterfeits sold on the streets of New York or online bearing a designer's brand name or logo are clearly actionable, replicas sold by "fast fashion" retailers like Zara, Forever 21 and Urban Outfitters sometimes are not.  These retailers will likely consult with legal counsel to determine whether their designs, which are often inspired by runway fashions, are sufficiently different to avoid liability, and whether the design elements they have borrowed from the runway are even protected under current U.S. law. Designers should similarly work with experienced IP counsel to develop effective and well-informed strategies for protecting and enforcing their rights.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
12 Oct 2018, Other, Boston, United States

The New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable has been meeting bimonthly since 1995 to discuss current topics related to important changes in the electric power industry in Massachusetts and throughout New England.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Duane Morris LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Duane Morris LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions