United States:
Administrative Directive 2016-1
09 February 2016
Fox Rothschild LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Superior Court Administrative Directive 2016-1, provides the
Court's civil and criminal judicial assignments for 2016 (a
copy of Administrative Directive 2016-1 can be found
here). This information is important for litigants assessing
when their case might be scheduled for trial–criminal matters
will receive scheduling preference over a Judge's civil docket.
In addition, the Directive establishes the administrative judges
for each county as follows:
New Castle County
Civil Administrative Judge – Judge Davis
Criminal Administrative Judge – Judge Carpenter
Asbestos Docket – Judge Medinilla and Judge Scott
Kent County
Civil Administrative Judge – Judge Young
Criminal Administrative Judge – Judge Clark
Sussex County
Civil Administrative Judge – Judge Stokes
Criminal Administrative Judge – Judge Bradley
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States
Defenses To Contract Damages In New York
KI Legal
Defendants who face breach of contract damages claims can assert several defenses to mitigate, or altogether eliminate, a potential award of damages against them.
Is Premises Liability The Same As Negligence?
Ward and Smith, P.A.
In today's world, we travel all the time. We shop at grocery stores and department stores, we take walks on the sidewalks in our neighborhoods, and we go to large events, such as concerts or weddings, at various venues.
Defamation vs. Free Speech
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs
The concepts of defamation and free speech often collide, raising questions about where the line should be drawn between the right to express oneself and the responsibility...
