ARTICLE
9 February 2016

Securities Enforcement 2015 Year-End Review

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC or the Commission) filed a record 807 enforcement actions in fiscal year 2015, 52 more than it filed in 2014.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC or the Commission) filed a record 807 enforcement actions in fiscal year 2015, 52 more than it filed in 2014. It also set a record by obtaining approximately $4.2 billion in disgorgement and penalties in fiscal year 2015, a modest increase over the $4.16 billion it obtained in 2014.

The second half of 2015 was notable for more than just unprecedented enforcement activity, however. Some of the key developments over the last six months, which are discussed further in this review, include the departure of Commissioners Luis Aguilar and Daniel Gallagher, challenges to the SEC's use of administrative proceedings in litigated enforcement actions, the SEC's continued efforts to secure admissions of wrongdoing as a condition for settling enforcement actions, the grant of a conditional bad-actor waiver to a large financial institution, the ever-increasing use of the Commission's Whistleblower Program, a series of enforcement actions arising out of the SEC's review of cybersecurity systems, the impact of the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in United States v. Salman on the future of insider trading, the institution of enforcement actions against compliance personnel, and the Second Circuit's long-awaited decision in United States v. Litvak on what statements can qualify as material in securities fraud actions.

View Securities Enforcement 2015 Year-End Review (citations omitted)

View Securities Enforcement 2015 Year-End Review (with citations)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More