United States: Microinequities: Should Employers "Sweat The Small Stuff"?

Microinequities are the subtle putdowns, snubs, dismissive gestures, or sarcastic tones that can undercut employee performance and encourage employee turnover.1 Articles in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Time Magazine, among other publications, evidence the growing concern of corporations across the country about the impact of microinequities on employee morale, productivity, and attrition. Recent court rulings call into question whether employers should fear that the latest HR buzzword 2 – microinequities – will become a source of labor law liability for employers. Put another way: Should employers "sweat the small stuff"?

In June 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court held in the case of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White that unlawful retaliation under Title VII may include actions that would not necessarily constitute discrimination. 3 Specifically, the Court ruled that an employee need not prove that he or she was subjected to a reduction in pay, demotion, or other material change in the terms and conditions of employment to establish a retaliation claim. 4 Rather, a plaintiff can prevail merely by showing that the alleged retaliatory conduct would have "dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination." 5

Similarly, in 2005, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in EEOC v. NEA held that "rude, overbearing, obnoxious, loud, vulgar, and generally unpleasant" conduct "not on its face, sex – or gender-related" could be grounds for an employment discrimination claim under Title VII. 6

These decisions arguably encourage litigation over workplace incidents that, when viewed alone, should not rise to the level of actionable discrimination or sexual harassment.

Against this backdrop of apparently lowered legal standards for the severity of conduct necessary to establish claims of employment discrimination, there is an increased concern and renewed focus by corporate America on the effects on employee morale, productivity, and attrition of facially non-discriminatory, e.g., not sex- or race-specific, behaviors among employees, microinequities. In this Commentary, we explore the extent to which microinequities can also serve as the basis for employment discrimination claims.

Microinequities Defined

M.I.T. Professor Dr. Mary Rowe coined the term "microinequities" in 1973 to refer to a non-obvious form of discrimination that was not unlawful, but nonetheless created and/or reinforced "glass barriers" excluding persons who were different and perpetuating unequal opportunity. 7 Microinequities are often subtle messages of disapproval or disregard at times unconsciously communicated to others. By way of example, microinequities include:

  • Dismissing the idea of one employee only to embrace it when paraphrased by another
  • Using a formal handshake with one employee and a playful pretend punch for another employee who will then be perceived (correctly or not) to be in management’s "inner circle"
  • Going out to lunch with certain employees more frequently than others
  • Not saying "good morning" or otherwise greeting employees
  • Checking one’s BlackBerry or otherwise multi-tasking while speaking to an employee
  • Addressing some employees by chummy nicknames, and others more formally
  • Mispronouncing, despite earlier correction, the name of an employee or confusing the names of two employees
  • Crossing one’s arms when listening to a comment from an employee
  • Routinely being late for or leaving early from meetings
  • Ridiculing accents or peculiar speech patterns of employees
  • Continually interrupting employees or completing sentences for people

Microinequities Alone Are Not Actionable

Fortunately for employers, under the current state of the law, microinequities, in and of themselves, have yet to become actionable. In the same Burlington Northern case noted above, the U.S. Supreme Court unambiguously held that petty slights, minor annoyances, or a simple lack of good manners are not unlawful. 8 The Court explained that judicial standards must filter out the significant, objective harm from complaints about the ordinary tribulations of the workplace such as the sporadic use of abusive language or snubbing by supervisors or co-workers. Employers, therefore, can take solace that Title VII does not "set forth a general civility code for the American workplace." Similarly, the California Supreme Court has held that a "mere offensive utterance or even a pattern of social slights" such as "ostracism suffered at the hands of co-workers" is not actionable under the state’s anti-discrimination statute. 9 Likewise, other courts have opined that "[w]orkplaces are rarely idyllic retreats, and the mere fact that an employee is displeased by an employer’s act or omission does not elevate the act or omission to the level of a materially adverse employment action." 10

With such pronouncements by the courts, should employers be concerned about microinequities, i.e., "sweating the small stuff"? The answer is yes, and for reasons beyond merely their effects on employee morale, productivity, and attrition.

Microinequities Still a Cause for Legal Concern

Evidence of discriminatory animus. To begin with, while not actionable alone, microinequities can be used as "atmospheric evidence" of discriminatory animus to support discrimination claims premised on more severe conduct. For instance, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Demoret v. Zegarelli recently found that a supervisor’s micromanaging of a female subordinate and criticism of her for being five minutes late to meetings (when male employees could allegedly skip meetings with impunity) did not rise to the level of a hostile environment. 11 Nonetheless, in denying the employer’s summary judgment motion, the court held that these otherwise lawful acts did give rise to an inference of gender discrimination. 12

Increasing sensitivity to minor slights should reduce occurrence of all slights. Likewise, by educating employees about otherwise semiconscious and perhaps unintentional messages of disrespect, employees are more likely to refrain from conduct that may be more clearly offensive and form the basis for claims of more overt discrimination. Conversely, minor unpleasantries that go unchecked can allow escalation of behavior culminating in significant and actionable transgressions.

Employer duty to prevent discrimination and harassment from occurring. Similarly, education and training on microinequities further establishes that an employer is meeting its overall duty to prevent discrimination and harassment in the workplace. 13

Glass ceiling effects. Further, repeated slights and exclusions – microinequities – are often reported as contributing to glass ceiling environments and otherwise helping to preclude the advancement of persons of protected categories within companies.

Avoid unnecessary litigation costs. It also is important to note that even if a plaintiff is ultimately unsuccessful, many lawsuits start from employees feeling marginalized, excluded, and trivialized based on race, gender, age, or some other protected category status. As any employer who has successfully defended an employment lawsuit well knows, a defense verdict in such cases is the classic example of a Pyrrhic victory. 14 Therefore, employers will benefit by cultivating a corporate culture where employees are conscious of the effects of and attempt to eliminate microinequities because employers will thereby reduce the likelihood that lawsuits (regardless of merit) will be brought.

The slippery slope of evolving labor law. Finally, on the one hand, Burlington Northern indicates that there exists a bright line distinguishing microinequities from unlawful employment actions. On the other hand, the deterrence standard for retaliation claims adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court in Burlington Northern also suggests a potential blurring of this distinction. The Burlington Northern Court underscored the importance of context in examining allegations of workplace wrongdoing – "[c]ontext matters." 15 In particular, the Burlington Northern Court explained that it was important to examine the totality of circumstances, because "[t]he real social impact of workplace behavior often depends on a constellation of surrounding circumstances, expectations, and relationships which are not fully captured by a simple recitation of the words used or the physical acts performed." 16 Indeed, there are many slights, rude behaviors, and other conduct far less severe than an actual demotion or termination of employment that might nonetheless cause an employee a level of discomfort that affects the employee’s ability to effectively perform his or her job. One could argue that if an employee believed that facing such microinequities would be the consequence, a reasonable worker might be dissuaded from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.

It does not appear that under the current state of the law, an employee facing such microinequities would have an actionable claim. However, the answer arguably is not clear, and if not actionable today, there is no telling whether a claim on such grounds would be actionable in the future. For example, it was not until 1986 that the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson recognized the concept of "hostile environment" sexual harassment as an actionable form of sex discrimination under Title VII. 17 Today, of course, hostile environment is one of the most common forms of discrimination and harassment claims. The application of a totality-of-circumstances standard by courts analyzing discrimination claims may be a step on a slippery slope towards recognition of microinequities, alone, as actionable.


In sum, the boundaries delineating employer liability have not expanded to encompass the "small stuff" – the petty slights and minor annoyances that often take place at work and that all employees experience – standing alone. While there may not yet be a cause for employer alarm, there is sufficient grounds for employers to be concerned about the potential for legal exposure based on microinequities. "Sweating the small stuff" – being mindful of and trying to eliminate microinequities in the workplace – not only will promote employee retention and overall corporate performance but also should help reduce employer liability for employment law claims in general.


1 Joann S. Lublin, Improve Morale by Eliminating Subtle Slights in the Workplace, Wall Street Journal Online (2004), http://www.careerjournal.com/columnists/manageyourcareer/20041208-managingyourcareer.html.

2 Julie Rawe, Why the Boss May Treat You Right (also entitled Why Your Boss May Start Sweating the Small Stuff), Time (March 15, 2006), http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1172212,00.html.

3 See the June 2006 edition of Morrison & Foerster’s Employment Law Commentary for a detailed analysis of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White, 126 S. Ct. 2405 (2006).

4 Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White, 126 S. Ct. 2405, 2412-15 (2006).

5 Id. at 2415.

6 EEOC v. NEA, 422 F.3d 840, 844-45 (9th Cir. 2005).

7 Mary P. Rowe, Barriers to Equality: The Power of Subtle Discrimination to Maintain Unequal Opportunity, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 153-63 (1990).

8 Burlington Northern, 126 S. Ct. at 2415.

9 Yanowitz v. L’Oreal USA, Inc., 36 Cal. 4th 1028, 1054 (Cal. 2005) (citation omitted).

10 McRae v. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 142 Cal. App. 4th 377, 386 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) (citation omitted).

11 Demoret v. Zegarelli, 451 F.3d 140, 150 (2d Cir. 2006).

12 Id. at 152.

13 See, e.g., Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(k) ("It shall be an unlawful employment practice…. For an employer … to fail to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent discrimination and harassment from occurring.").

14 See, e.g., Owen v. Sunstar Acceptance Corp., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16932, at *13-16, (S.D. Ala. 1999) (exclusion from lunch and business meetings did not create hostile work environment).

15 Burlington Northern, 126 S. Ct. at 2415.

16 Id. See also McRae, 142 Cal. App. 4th at 387-88 ("in many cases, the employee is affected by a series of employment actions, at least some of which might not, in and of themselves, constitute a material change in the terms or conditions of employment. In such cases, it is appropriate to consider the ... allegations collectively under a totality of circumstances approach.").

17 Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 63-69 (1986).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions