United States: Are The Patent Trolls Vulnerable To Antitrust Claims?

Last Updated: February 3 2016
Article by William DeVinney

We previously wrote about the nascent efforts of legislators, regulators, and representatives of technology-dependent industries to use the antitrust laws, such as Section 2 of the Sherman Act or Section 7 of the Clayton Act, to rein in perceived abuses by patent aggregation entities ("PAEs"), more commonly known as patent trolls. One potential difficulty in bringing PAEs' actions under the antitrust laws is that their activities do not fit neatly into any traditional definition of a relevant product market. The United States District Court of Maryland, however, recently permitted antitrust counterclaims against a PAE to proceed to discovery, even though the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia previously dismissed similar counterclaims involving the same parties based on a failure to allege a proper relevant product market.1

In Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp., Intellectual Ventures I brought a patent infringement suit in the United States District Court of Maryland alleging that Capital One infringed four patents in its portfolio. Capital One asserted a counterclaim and third-party complaint (against shell companies owned and controlled by Intellectual Ventures I), alleging Intellectual Ventures I violated Sherman Act Section 2 and Clayton Act Section 7. Capital One alleged that Intellectual Ventures I owns 3,500 patents purportedly relating to online financial services, but holds those patents through an opaque network of 2,000 shell corporations. Intellectual Ventures I hides those patents to prevent businesses from designing around those patents or, once Intellectual Ventures I brings an infringement action, determining the value of any license to a single patent or group of patents. Further, Capital One alleged that Intellectual Ventures I operates in the ex post market, meaning it intentionally waits until financial institutions have designed and implemented their online banking services. After financial institutions have already invested in the online services, Intellectual Ventures I threatens constant litigation against the financial institution if it does not take a license on a broad portfolio of patents, the vast majority of which are likely invalid or do not cover the financial institution's online banking system.

This was not the first suit between Intellectual Ventures I and Capital One. Intellectual Ventures I previously asserted patent infringement claims against Capital One in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, where Capital One also asserted antitrust counterclaims. In the Eastern District of Virginia, the court dismissed Capital One's counterclaim. The court found that Capital One's alleged relevant market—"the market for technology used to provide commercial banking services in the United States"—failed to allege "any of the recognized indicia of a relevant market."2 In particular, Capital One failed to identify any area of effective competition between Capital One and Intellectual Ventures I.

Based on the Eastern District of Virginia's decision, Intellectual Ventures I moved to dismiss Capital One's counterclaim and third-party complaint because Capital One's relevant market allegations were barred by issue preclusion. But the District Court of Maryland found that Capital One had alleged new facts learned after the Eastern District of Virginia's decision. The court also found that Capital One alleged a different relevant market: "that the 3,500 patents in the Intellectual Ventures companies' financial services portfolio constitute the relevant market."3 Thus, the court found issue preclusion did not apply.

The court incorporated its previous decision allowing Capital One to amend its answer to include the antitrust counterclaims. In that order, the court found Capital One alleged a proper relevant market.4 The court supported its finding with cases in which the defendant controlled the patents, copyright, or product lines at issue to "lock in" customers to those patents, copyrights, or product lines.5 For example, the court found Capital One's alleged interactions with Intellectual Ventures I to be similar to those in Eastman Kodak v. Image Technology Services, where Kodak restricted competitors' access to Kodak replacement parts. "Like the Kodak customers with no choice but to seek parts and services directly from Kodak (because the parts and services were necessary to run the equipment they already owned, had no equivalent, and were not otherwise available), the banks have no choice but to pay licensing fees to the Intellectual Ventures companies (and/or legal fees to challenge the licenses) because their online services, which already are in use, cannot run without their components, for which the Intellectual Ventures companies purport to hold valid patents."6

The court also found Capital One's alleged relevant market similar to that in Meredith Corp v. SESAC LLC.7 In Meredith, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant, one of three performing rights organizations ("PROs") that controlled the copyrights to music licensed for local television stations, violated Section 2 by monopolizing "the market for television-performance rights to works within SESAC's directory."8 Television stations could not pick and choose which songs they wanted to license, but were forced to take block licenses. The court found the alleged market demonstrated significant similarity to Capital One's proposed market: "This is akin to the circumstances in Meredith Corp., in which local stations could only go to the PROs, not the composers and musicians, and had to go to each PRO, as each amassed a distinct collection of music."9

The Eastern District of Virginia had rejected Capital One's argument that Eastman Kodak and Meredith Corp. applied, finding that in those cases, the defendant controlled a business necessity of the plaintiff, where Capital One's only business necessity was to avoid litigation. But the District of Maryland found that Capital One's revised allegations properly alleged a business necessity "to continue to provide the online services they already offer without paying the cost-prohibitive licensing fees to the Intellectual Ventures companies."10

Thus, the court denied Intellectual Ventures I's motion to dismiss, and clearly stated that the antitrust claims would proceed to discovery: "[i]t would be unwise for [the plaintiffs] to look at [their right to amend their answer] as an opportunity to seek leave to file another motion to dismiss. The time has come to move forward with discovery."11

The takeaway is that courts are divided on whether PAEs' activities are subject to the antitrust laws, in particular whether it is possible to allege a proper relevant product market. The fact that they are divided, however, necessarily means that some courts are willing to allow a claim to go forward. The dispute between Intellectual Ventures I and Capital One is worth monitoring.

Footnotes

[1] Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp., 2016 WL 160263 (D. Md. Jan. 14, 2016).

[2] Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp., 2013 WL 6682891, *5 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2013).

[3] Intellectual Ventures I, 2016 WL 160263, at *3.

[4] Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial Corp., 99 F. Supp. 3d 610, 620-24 (D. Md. 2015).

[5] Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Tech. Services, Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992); Broadcomm Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 307 (3d Cir. 2007); Meredith Corp. v. SESAC LLC, 1 F. Supp. 3d 180 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

[6] Intellectual Ventures I, 99 F. Supp. 3d at 621.

[7] Meredith Corp. v. SESAC LLC, 1 F. Supp. 3d 180 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

[8] Intellectual Ventures I, 99 F. Supp. 3d at 622, quoting Meredith Corp., 1 F. Supp. 3d at 218.

[9] Intellectual Ventures I, 99 F. Supp. 3d at 622, citing Meredith Corp., 1 F. Supp. 3d at 218.

[10] Id. at 623.

[11] Intellectual Ventures I, 2016 WL 160263, at *6.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions