ARTICLE
3 February 2016

International Employment Law Update: Private Emails On Professional Tools Are No Longer Private

O
Orrick

Contributor

Orrick logo
Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the technology & innovation, energy & infrastructure and finance sectors. Founded over 150 years ago, Orrick has offices in 25+ markets worldwide. Financial Times selected Orrick as the Most Innovative Law Firm in North America for three years in a row.
In a landmark decision on January 12, 2016, the CEDH (European Court of Human Rights), ruled that employers have the right to read their employees private emails sent during working hours...
European Union Employment and HR

In a landmark decision on January 12, 2016, the CEDH (European Court of Human Rights), ruled that employers have the right to read their employees private emails sent during working hours, on condition that this surveillance remains reasonable.

Surveillance of a professional email account: The context of this decision:

A Rumanian sales engineer had opened a professional "Yahoo Messenger" at his employer's request in order to respond to client's queries.

During one week the employer had checked the use of this account and found that it was being used for messages between the employee and members of his family and his fiancée, while the Company's rules stated that all private use of professional email accounts was prohibited.

The employer dismissed the employee for his misconduct.

The Employee claimed for unfair dismissal before the Rumanian Courts which rejected his claims.

Then he argued before the ECHR that his "rights to the respect of his private and family life" had been violated.

This Claim was also rejected.

No violation of private life took place:

The Court ruled that it is not abuse of private life for an employer to check that an employee uses his/her working time to work.

For this case the surveillance resulted in listing all the non-professional communication made without producing the contain and the identity of the addressees. Thus the ECHR concluded that there was a balance between the rights of employer and the human rights of the employee.

The French Supreme Court had already ruled in the same way.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More