ARTICLE
26 January 2016

Out-Of-State Subsidiary Holding Company Cannot Be Forcibly Included In A Colorado Combined Return

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
A Denver District Court judge has held that the Colorado Department of Revenue cannot forcibly combine a corporation's subsidiary, a holding company that derived its income solely from investments...
United States Tax

A Denver District Court judge has held that the Colorado Department of Revenue cannot forcibly combine a corporation's subsidiary, a holding company that derived its income solely from investments in foreign entities, in  Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of the State of Colorado, et al. The court ruled that the Department of Revenue was bound by its own regulation, which provided that a corporation without any property or payroll of its own cannot be included in a Colorado combined return. The court also ruled that neither an IRC section 482-type Colorado statute, nor the economic substance doctrine, gave the Department the authority to include the subsidiary in its parent's Colorado combined return.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More