United States: Supreme Court Limits Defendants' Use Of Offers Of Judgment To Moot Class Actions

In a closely watched case, the U.S. Supreme Court has dealt a significant blow to the ability of class action defendants to "pick off" named plaintiffs by offering them complete relief for their individual claims, thereby mooting the remainder of the class action.

In Campbell-Ewald v. Gomez, No. 14-857 (U.S. Jan. 20, 2016), a 6-3 majority of the Supreme Court led by Justice Ginsburg held that an unaccepted offer of judgment made to a named plaintiff pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, standing alone, does not moot the plaintiff's claim and deprive the trial court of Article III subject-matter jurisdiction. While the court's decision blunts a strategy that has enjoyed increasing popularity with defendants to try to shed themselves of class actions, particularly those involving low-dollar consumer claims, both the majority and dissenting opinions recognize the possibility that Rule 68 offers of judgment can still be employed as an effective part of the defense arsenal.

Rule 68 Offers of Judgment

Rule 68 provides that "at least 14 days before the date set for trial, a party defending against the claim may serve on an opposing party an offer to allow judgment on specified terms, with the costs then accrued." Under the rule, failure to accept the offer subjects the offeree to liability for all costs incurred after the date of the offer unless the offeree gets a judgment more favorable than the unaccepted offer.

In the context of class action litigation, defendants have used Rule 68 offers of judgment as a tool for picking off representative plaintiffs, mooting the remainder of the case and forcing courts to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. For instance, in consumer cases arising from the purchase of low-cost goods or under statutes such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the damages and other relief sought by an individual plaintiff may be low enough that it makes economic sense for a defendant, prior to class certification, to offer the plaintiff as much if not more than he or she could recover by litigating the case to a successful conclusion.

Once the named plaintiff is picked off, the defendant argues that the remainder of the case is "moot" and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The use of Rule 68 offers of judgment as a pick-off tactic has split federal courts across the country, with some approving the practice while others condemned it.

The Campbell-Ewald Case

The Campbell-Ewald case arose as a purported class action for violations of the TCPA. Plaintiff Gomez alleged that he received unwanted text messages on his mobile phone as part of a recruiting campaign for the U.S. Navy and that he had not consented to get the texts. The TCPA generally prohibits using an automated telephone dialing system to make voice calls or send text messages to a cellular telephone without the recipient's prior express consent. A successful plaintiff under the TCPA can receive injunctive relief and damages ranging from $500 to $1,500 per call or text (the TCPA does not provide for recovery of attorney's fees). Gomez sought treble damages and injunctive relief for himself and all other recipients of the unsolicited texts.

Before Gomez could move for class certification, the defendant made a Rule 68 offer of judgment to pay Gomez $1,503 for each text message he received, together with costs and a stipulated injunction against sending text messages in violation of the TCPA. When Gomez did not accept the offer, the defendant contended that his claim was moot and the case should be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court held that the offer of judgment had expired when not accepted after 14 days in accordance with Rule 68 and thus could not affect the continued viability of Gomez's claim. "An unaccepted settlement offer - like any unaccepted contract offer - is a legal nullity with no operative effect." Accordingly, an unaccepted offer of judgment does not moot a plaintiff's case or affect the ability of a district court to adjudicate it.

The Continued Vitality of Rule 68 Offers

Despite the court's holding in Campbell-Ewald, Rule 68 offers still may play a key role in terminating class actions. As the dissenters led by Chief Justice Roberts argued, even if an offer of complete relief is not enough to moot a case, actual payment of complete relief pursuant to that offer can moot a case. "The majority holds that an offer of complete relief is insufficient to moot a case. The majority does not say that payment of complete relief leads to the same result." Indeed, "the majority's analysis may have come out differently if Campbell had deposited the offered funds with the District Court." Tellingly, the majority did not reject this notion, stating only: "We need not, and do not, now decide whether the result would be different if a defendant deposits the full amount of the plaintiff's individual claim in an account payable to the plaintiff, and the court then enters judgment in that amount."

The Campbell-Ewald decision is not necessarily the death knell for use of Rule 68 offers of judgment to thwart class actions. Instead, a class action defendant looking to cut off potential liability must go beyond simply extending the offer to actually tendering payment into court and allowing the entry of judgment in favor of the individual plaintiff. There is an open issue when litigating claims under statutes such as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act that provide for shifting attorney's fees. In those instances, the attorney's fees are generally unknown such that a defendant may not be able to tender into court the entire amount due to a plaintiff at the time the offer of judgment is made. Although this remains an open issue, it may be a good practice to make a Rule 68 offer of judgment, pay statutory or calculable damages into court and agree to pay attorney's fees and costs then accrued in an amount to be determined by the court. Once the court makes that determination, the additional amount can be paid into court. The court can then enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and dismiss any remaining class claims as moot.

While there may be valid legal and business reasons for a defendant not to want an "adverse" judgment entered against it, the prospect of bearing the potentially enormous litigation costs of a class action and the threat of a ruinous judgment make a Rule 68 offer of judgment something that a prudent class action defendant still needs to consider.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Joshua Horn
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.