United States: Structured Thoughts: News For The Financial Services Community - Volume 7, Issue 1 January 15, 2016

T+2 SETTLEMENT AND STRUCTURED NOTES

Introduction

In December 2015, the "T+2 Industry Steering Committee" published its Implementation Playbook. The Playbook is intended to provide, among other things, a timeline and milestones that market participants should consider in order to migrate to a two-day settlement cycle for different securities. The migration is intended to be completed by the end of the third quarter of 2017.

In this article, we discuss a few aspects of T+2 settlements especially relevant to structured notes.

Impact on Initial Issuances

First, the Playbook is principally directed at secondary market trades. (Similarly, SEC Rule 15c6-1 governs sales in the secondary market.) However, for many transactions, a change in the settlement cycle for secondary market trades is likely to trigger a similar change for the initial settlement. This arises from the fact that, even though structured notes are usually designed to be "buy and hold" instruments, it is possible that an investor may seek to sell a structured note on the same date that the investor agreed to purchase it or shortly thereafter. In order to facilitate the closing of the secondary sale, some market participants will conform the time period for the initial settlement to that of the secondary market.

Benefits of T+2 Initial Settlement

Many believe that a T+2 settlement cycle is likely to yield benefits to the investment community, including reduced credit and counterparty risk, operational process improvements, cash deployment efficiencies, increased market liquidity, lower collateral requirements, and enhanced global settlement harmonization (as discussed in the Playbook).

In the area of structured notes, the shorter settlement period may somewhat reduce the disparity between the level of a reference asset on the pricing date and its level on the settlement date. Similarly, the issuer's "initial estimated value" of the notes on the pricing date will possibly align more closely with the value on the settlement date. An issuer that keys its blackout period to settlement dates, as opposed to only the pricing date, will obtain one more day in which notes may be offered.1

Many Offerings Currently Close on a T+2 Basis

We note that many structured note offerings currently close on a T+2 basis. (And T+1 is not entirely unheard of either.) Offerings typically close on this schedule when they price towards the end of the month, and the parties wish to complete the settlement by month-end. This often occurs in the case of reverse inquiry transactions that are arranged near month-end, and the timing of the parties' meeting of the minds as to the terms of the notes does not permit the offering to close by month-end if a T+3 schedule is used. Many broadly-marketed "calendar offerings" also close on this schedule as well. Accordingly, a T+2 settlement cycle would not be completely new to the structured note market.

Platforms Structured Without Regard to the T+3 Cycle

Of course, many offerings currently close on a T+5 schedule (or longer settlement cycle), and some broker-dealer manufacturers of structured notes have T+5 as a default schedule for most of their offerings. These market participants may or may not wish to reduce their typical settlement cycle if and when T+2 becomes the law of the land. It is unlikely that they will be required by any new regulations to make such a change.

Impact on Valuation Dates and Observation Dates?

To the extent that the settlement cycle changes, some market participants may seek to shorten other time periods relevant to structured notes. For example, the standard periods between (a) interest observation dates and interest payment dates and (b) final valuation dates and maturity dates may be shortened as well to match the new T+2 cycle. However, issuers, calculation agents and paying agents will need to review carefully their procedures and capabilities before making any changes of this kind.

Towards a Quicker Settlement Cycle

Shortening the settlement cycle by one business day adds a bit of urgency to ensuring that all necessary documents and signatures required for settlement are ready for use. Initial drafts of any relevant forms of notes, officer certificates, legal opinions and closing instructions will need to be accelerated accordingly, and members of the working group will be encouraged, when practicable, to have these pieces in motion before pricing occurs.

In many cases, the final pricing supplement is itself a "closing document." This can occur when the form of pricing supplement is attached to a form of note for the issuance in order to incorporate by reference the economic terms into the note. Alternatively, a program may utilize a "master note" form, which contemplates a single note for an entire MTN series, with each relevant pricing supplement forming a part of that master note. In these cases, a T+2 settlement cycle would mean that the final pricing supplement must be ready for use approximately one-and-a-half business days after the pricing, since the settlement will occur on the morning of the second business day after the pricing.

The change to the settlement cycle may encourage more issuers to utilize the master note format, as there will likely be fewer documents to create and complete during a shorter settlement window. In addition, the master note format does not require an officer's signature on the note itself.

Market participants will need to review carefully their document suite and procedures to ensure that any accelerated closings will be completed smoothly under the new regime.

FINRA ADDRESSES INACCURATE LEVELS OF A PROPRIETARY INDEX

In November 2015, FINRA fined a member firm after the member firm published inaccurate levels for a proprietary index. In this case,2 FINRA demonstrated that index levels published by a member firm can be subject to review and enforcement under FINRA's communication rules.

The member firm maintained a variety of indices that related to certain European asset-backed securities. The indices were used by approximately 40 institutional investors in Europe and were not the underlying asset for any structured notes or derivative products. However, for several years, the indices were published with inaccurate coupon return information. The relevant division of the member firm became aware of these errors and the fact that they would need to revise the historic index levels. However, the member firm continued to publish the indices for several months, without disclosing the inaccuracies to subscribers. Later, the member firm restated the index levels, disclosing that it had understated coupon returns on the relevant securities.

The index errors arose following a variety of calculation and process changes made by the member firm.

Violations

On the basis of these facts, FINRA determined that several of its rules were violated.

  • Just and Equitable Principles of Trade (FINRA Rule 2010). FINRA concluded that the member firm violated this rule in that index subscribers had a reasonable expectation that the member firm would inform them of significant inaccuracies. However, the member firm did not do so and continued to publish the index with inaccurate levels.
  • Supervision (NASD Rule 3010(a) and FINRA Rule 2010). FINRA concluded that the member firm violated these rules by failing to properly test the index methodology after its calculation changes were made.
  • Communications with the Public (NASD Rule 2210 and FINRA Rules 2210 and 2010). FINRA concluded that the member firm violated these rules, particularly because the member firm knew it was providing inaccurate information.

Application to Other Indices and Other Materials

The case is relevant to proprietary indices and other statistical information that broker-dealers engaged in the structured products industry provide to their customers. For example, in addition to disseminating the levels of proprietary indices, some broker-dealers make available to customers information about the performance since the pricing date of the underlying asset for an outstanding structured note's reference asset or the performance of particular notes that have matured. This type of information may help an investor evaluate the value of its current holdings or to assess future investment opportunities.

Of course, knowingly providing incorrect information would be highly problematic under any standard. However, the case stands for the principle that, even if incorrect information is unintentionally disseminated, FINRA will scrutinize a member firm's procedures to determine whether they were carefully designed to prevent this from happening. FINRA's communications rules can be applied to these types of documentation, and an appropriate process should be in place to ensure the accuracy of the information that is set forth.

In this case, the index wasn't used as a reference asset for a structured note or similar product. The inclusion of erroneous index data in an FWP or pricing supplement for a structured note would be even more problematic, as it could also be a basis for a claim for damages or rescission under the federal securities laws.

SEC ISSUES RESEARCH NOTE RELATING TO AUGUST 2015 EQUITY MARKET VOLATILITY

In December 2015, the Office of Analytics and Research of the SEC's Division of Trading and Markets issued a research note discussing the extreme volatility that impacted the U.S. equities market, including the shares of many ETFs, on August 24, 2015. For part of that day, many ETFs traded at prices that differed significantly from their net asset values and/or the levels of their respective underlying indices. Some ETF investors were left wondering whether they had received fair prices for sales that they had completed. The events caused a number of issuers of structured notes to reevaluate the disclosures and risk factors used in connection with their ETF-linked products.

The staff's full report may be found at the following link: https://www.sec.gov/marketstructure/research/equity_market_volatility.pdf.

The research note states that it could be used to help assess the operation of the stock market under stressed conditions. However, the note does not necessarily intend to specify the causes of the volatility and did not recommend any regulatory or other steps that may be taken in order to address similar events in the future.

The research note discusses the opening process at several U.S. primary exchanges, the triggering of trading pauses under the National Market System Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility, and the effects of market volatility on trading in exchange-traded products such as ETFs.

The paper, written by SEC staff, looked at issues such as the lack of a uniform approach among exchanges to open trading, including after stocks have been temporarily halted, how trading pauses are triggered in volatile conditions, and how exchange-traded products, like ETFs, are affected by volatility.

According to the research note, the SEC's staff continues to examine the trading issues on August 24th.

THE OCIE's AND FINRA's 2016 PRIORITIES LETTERS, AND STRUCTURED PRODUCTS

In a bit of a change from recent years, FINRA's 2016 priorities letter does not dedicate as much space to structured products. Similarly, the OCIE's letter does not single out this area. That being said, these offerings and products are likely to remain a focus for the regulators in 2016.3

For our more detailed blog entries relating to these letters, please click here:

In particular, these letters contemplate structured products in a number of areas, including the following:

  • Conflicts of Interest. FINRA indicated that it plans to complete in 2016 the targeted examination that it launched in late 2015 regarding incentive structures and conflicts of interest. For example, to the extent that structured products remain a proprietary product, FINRA will continue to be interested in how these products are offered and sold.
  • Suitability. FINRA noted that some firms have failed to tailor their systems for determining suitability and concentration to the specifics of their product offerings. FINRA cited structured products as an example. Similarly, the OCIE expressed an interest in the promotion of new and complex products and related sales practice issues, in order to identify potential suitability issues and potential breaches of fiduciary obligations.
  • Concentration. On a related point, FINRA noted deficiencies is firms' failure to adequately monitor for excess concentration. This included circumstances in which member firms focused on more risky products without properly ensuring suitable recommendations and avoiding excess concentration. FINRA indicated that it will assess whether registered representatives adequately consider factors such as credit risk, duration, and leverage in connection with complex products.
  • ETFs. ETFs remain a focus of regulatory scrutiny. For example, the OCIE expressed an interest in the adequacy of risk disclosures and suitability determinations, particularly in the case of nice or leveraged/inverse ETFs.

Broker-dealers can operate under the assumption that structured products remain on FINRA's radar screen in 2016.

Footnotes

1. For a discussion of blackout periods and their impact on structured notes, please see our November 20, 2015 issue, available at: http://www.mofo.com/~/media/Files/Newsletter/2015/11/151120StructuredThoughts.pdf

2. FINRA Action No. 2014042781801.

3. If you would like to read these letters in full (which we would encourage you to do), the FINRA letter and its press release may be found at: http://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/2016-regulatory-and-examination-priorities-letter.pdf and the OCIE's letter and press release may be found at: http://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2016-4.html.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Bradley Berman
Anna Pinedo
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions